home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.editors
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!wolff
- From: wolff@inf.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Wolff)
- Subject: Re: decent unix editors?
- Message-ID: <MHM5BM@math.fu-berlin.de>
- Sender: news@math.fu-berlin.de (Math Department)
- Organization: Free University of Berlin, Germany
- References: <1992Jul30.191243.21826@ncsu.edu> <1992Jul30.224650.10106@convex.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:09:45 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
-
- bkjacobs@eos.ncsu.edu wrote:
-
- >I'm looking for a decent text editor for UNIX. EMACS is
- >cumbersome and don't even think about suggesting VI!
-
- I've just posted my adaptation of Mined to this group about a week ago.
- It might be what you wish and it should still be available on the net.
-
-
- bkjacobs@eos.ncsu.edu responded:
-
- >It doesn't seem particularly clever to tell a bunch of
- >Unix users that their favorite editors (emacs, vi; note
- >capitalization) are indecent, and then ask for something
- >that fits your model of decency.
-
- Excuse me, but I think this is comp.editors, not comp.unix.editors
- or alt.fan.vi.
-
- Thomas Wolff
- wolff@inf.fu-berlin.de
-