home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.editors:1789 comp.emacs:2658
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!tulane!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!Urmel.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE!gandalf!michael
- From: michael@gandalf.moria (Michael Haardt)
- Newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.emacs
- Subject: Re: MicroEmacs (was Re: Emacs implementations, list of, regular post [long])
- Message-ID: <9207171186@gandalf.moria>
- Date: 17 Jul 92 06:17:24 GMT
- Article-I.D.: gandalf.9207171186
- References: <DAVIS.92Jul17182323@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>
- Sender: news@Urmel.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (Newsfiles Owner)
- Reply-To: u31b3hs@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (Michael Haardt)
- Organization: Moria
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rama
-
- From article <DAVIS.92Jul17182323@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>, by davis@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu ("John E. Davis"):
- >
- > In article <1992Jul17.181740.12693@news2.cis.umn.edu> fin@unet.umn.edu (Craig
- > A. Finseth) writes:
- > [...]
- > name: MicroEMACS
- > version: 3.11
- > implementation language: C
- > extension language: custom
- > scope of implementation: extensible
- > hardware/software requirements: UNIX, VMS, IBM PC,
- > HP 110 and 150, Amiga, Atari ST, Macintosh, Wicat,
- > Data General AOS/VS
- > kanji: Fujitsu FMR-70, NEC PC-9891
- >
- > Hm... I have version 3.11 which compiled ok under MSDOS but failed completely
- > under BSD unix. For example, compare the TERM structure in unix.c and the .h
- > files-- they are not at all compatable which causes seg faults among other
- > problems. So I propose that UNIX be removed from the list.
-
- No, UNIX stays. :) MicroEmacs runs fine on SunOS 4.1.1 and Linux. BSD isn't
- UNIX, it's just a flavour. Perhaps you just have a bad copy. I got mine from
- an Linux ftp site, it is version 3.11c and I compiled it on my own. There are
- no manuals however.
-
- Michael
-