home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!zswamp!geoff
- From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Serial and Parallel interface ??????
- Message-ID: <uXLaoB4w164w@zswamp.UUCP>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 92 22:54:41 EDT
- References: <1992Jul20.002903.11008@raven.alaska.edu>
- Organization: Izot's Swamp
- Lines: 30
-
- floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) writes:
-
- > I doubt that most readers of this news group really care too much
- > for the history of tty channel units...
-
- C'mon, historical trivia is interesting and hardly terribly costly.
-
- > so I'll restate what I
- > said in a manner that cuts off the history that far back:
- >
- > ***
- > The original reason that computer modems were virtually all serial
- > devices as opposed to parallel devices probably has to do with the
- > fact that there were "standard" serial ports on most computers,
- > and there still isn't a standard bi-directional parallel port on
- > many systems.
- > ***
-
- For the longest time, everybody had their own flavour of RS-232 port... or
- were you speaking of 20 mA current loop?
-
- Nah, I'll go with Ed Hall's theory: I've seen lots of old FSK modems, and
- they're nothing more than two tone generators, with a selector wired directly
- to the TxD line... and an equally primitive decoder wired directly to the RxD
- line. Since bits were coded one at a time onto the phone line, it makde sense
- to send the data to the device one bit at a time and keep the modem very
- simple.
-
- Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
- geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
-