home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!wupost!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!bnrgate!nrcnet0!cunews!revcan!software.mitel.com!grayt
- From: grayt@Software.Mitel.COM (Tom Gray)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.cell-relay
- Subject: Re: Congestion Avoidance
- Message-ID: <12386@pinard>
- Date: 27 Jul 92 12:32:02 GMT
- References: <1992Jul19.130005.1@research.ptt.nl> <1992Jul25.092823.12189@e2big.mko.dec.com> <k3jm90-.nagle@netcom.com>
- Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <k3jm90-.nagle@netcom.com> nagle@netcom.com (John Nagle) writes:
- |
- | Uh oh. As the one-time congestion maven of the Internet
- |(look at the RFCs that bear my name) I somehow thought the cell relay
- |people had developed a new solution to the problem that would make
- |huge connectionless nets work. If they haven't, there's going to be
- |trouble a few years downstream.
-
- ATM is connection oriented only. Any connectionless traffic carried
- over ATM will be a service using a connection oriented backbone.
-
-
- |
- | The existing (NSFNET) approach of generously sizing the backbone using
- |government subsidies, may not translate well to the commercial world.
- |
- | John Nagle
-
-
- --
- i.sinature
-