home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.compression:2863 rec.video:9744 rec.video.satellite:3860 rec.video.production:1193
- Newsgroups: comp.compression,rec.video,rec.video.satellite,rec.video.production
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv1!babbage.waterloo.edu!elball
- From: elball@babbage.waterloo.edu (Eric Ladd Ball)
- Subject: Re: NBC Olympic coverage - reason
- Message-ID: <Bs5KC5.39@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>
- Sender: news@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <MONTA.92Jul26181344@image.mit.edu> <1992Jul27.035759.153188@zeus.calpoly.edu> <Bs2ACw.GBE@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca> <3715@vidiot.UUCP>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 13:33:40 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- I do believe I stand corrected. There has been enough posts by people
- "in the know" to my hypotheses out to dry. But...I still think that there
- is the possibility that non-interlaced frame-type cameras are being used.
- High "shutter-speed" is great to prevent blurring on freeze-frame, but it
- still does not prevent interlaced time-dependent artifacts.
- If they are using some sort of compression I'd be very impressed. That
- sort of equipment is not cheap.
- eric
-