home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.bbs.misc:309 alt.folklore.computers:11081
- Newsgroups: comp.bbs.misc,alt.folklore.computers
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!decwrl!adobe!swirsky
- From: swirsky@adobe.com (Robert Swirsky)
- Subject: Re: New York Times article on BBS's
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.160603.17656@adobe.com>
- Sender: usenet@adobe.com (USENET NEWS)
- Organization: Adobe Systems Incorporated, Mountain View
- References: <1992Jul20.080858.145@sdg.dra.com> <rdippold.711661229@cancun> <1992Jul23.140436.13451@panix.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 16:06:03 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Jul23.140436.13451@panix.com> eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler) writes:
- >
- >As much as I hate to agree with Ron Dippold on anything, his
- >speculation is dead-bang right on this one. I went to college with
- >Judith Berck, the author of the piece in the Times, and can vouch for
- >her unfamiliarity with anything vaguely resembling hard science. (For
- >the record, she has a new book out on the daily lives of homeless
- >children; title is something like _In Their Own Voices_.)
- >
- >In case anyone cares, David Sanger -- the idiot who keeps writing
- >pieces in the Times about computers that have "512,000" bytes of RAM
- >-- is also a classmate. I have no idea what he majored in.
- >
-
- I remember firing off a letter to the _Times_ a few years back after they wrote
- an article on dot-matrix printers. They said that a 5x7 dot matrix printer
- has 35 wires in its printhead. In fact, they even had a diagram of such
- a beast.
-
- I told them that, on all the dot printers someone is likely to encounter,
- there is just a single vertical row of pins. And I pointed out that the
- printhead would move in spurts instead of smoothy across the page if it
- had to print the entire character block at once.
-
- The _Times_ replied that sometimes they simplify thing a bit so they
- can explain them easier.
-