home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.arch:8387 alt.folklore.computers:11301 comp.benchmarks:1201
- Newsgroups: comp.arch,alt.folklore.computers,comp.benchmarks
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!mips!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!sctc.com!smith
- From: smith@sctc.com (Rick Smith)
- Subject: Re: dinosaur horsepower
- Message-ID: <1992Jul28.155852.23608@sctc.com>
- Organization: SCTC
- References: <Bs3oGt.6vp@helios.physics.utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 15:58:52 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- sysmark@helios.physics.utoronto.ca (Mark Bartelt) writes:
-
- >... a suggestion for something I'd like to see: A compendium of
- >old machines, and just how fast (well, slow) they were compared with the
- >systems we use today, and how much they cost when they were new.
-
- I put together a few tables of such data for "favorite" machines a
- few years back and I'll try to post them.
-
- >But, in general, I think it would be fun to see MIPS/MFlops (KIPS/KFlops?
- >IPS/Flops?) values (at least, moderately authoritative ballpark estimates)
- >for some of the machines we grew up with.
-
- Most speed info from the Good Old Days simply reported how long it took
- to do an Add and maybe a Multiply. On particularly weird machines
- (i.e. those with drums instead of RAM) these were sometimes reported
- as min, max, and average speeds.
-
- The classic source is Weik's Survey, which I think was last updated
- in 1961 for the Aberdeen Proving Grounds.
-
- >By the way, if the history project does succeed in emulating some of the
- >older machines, will it also provide an emulator for an 026 keypunch? ;-)
-
- I was a fan of papertape myself. (5 points: can you spot the pun?)
-
- Rick.
- smith@sctc.com arden hills, minnesota
-