home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #16 / NN_1992_16.iso / spool / comp / ai / 2923 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-07-29  |  1.0 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.ai
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!mchui@spinner.cs.indiana.edu
  3. From: Michael Chui <mchui@spinner.cs.indiana.edu>
  4. Subject: Re: Mainstreaming AI
  5. Message-ID: <1992Jul29.210706.25227@news.cs.indiana.edu>
  6. Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
  7. References: <1992Jul29.203044.9047@mercury.unt.edu> <Bs67x7.F20@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
  8. Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1992 21:07:01 -0500
  9. Lines: 16
  10.  
  11. >In article <1992Jul29.203044.9047@mercury.unt.edu> danny@ponder.csci.unt.edu (Danny Faught) writes:
  12. >
  13. >My question is, do you know any examples of AI techniques of the past
  14. >that were considered AI when they were being developed, but are now 
  15. >considered commonplace and having nothing to do with AI?
  16. >
  17. >Danny Faught
  18.  
  19.     Graph search techniques such as depth-first, and breadth-first
  20. search were once considered AI.
  21.     Statistical classification systems were also once considered AI.
  22. (Some still are.  Are we statistical classification systems?  Followups
  23. to comp.ai.philosophy, probably.)
  24.  
  25. Michael Chui
  26. mchui@cs.indiana.edu
  27.