home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky can.general:3675 can.politics:5598
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!dgp.toronto.edu!ematias
- Newsgroups: can.general,can.politics
- From: ematias@dgp.toronto.edu (Edgar Matias)
- Subject: Re: Does Quebec *want* to stay in Canada> (was Re: RACISM???...)
- Message-ID: <1992Jul30.150058.5724@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
- Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
- References: <1992Jul27.234323.11712@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1992Jul29.134507.21935@csi.uottawa.ca> <1992Jul29.125644.18710@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <Bs7n71.F44@ireq.hydro.qc.ca>
- Date: 30 Jul 92 19:00:58 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
-
- >Edgar, you want blab for blabling only. I tried to describe a Quebec
- >point of view more than my personal point of view. Maybe you live
- >in a island in middle of Toronto, but I don't. I have some feeling
- >about what Quebec wants, about the Quebec complex mind, etc. This from
- >the point of view of the majority.
-
- I post to this newsgroup a lot less often than many of the other netters
- (yourself included), so I don't see how you can accuse me of blabbing.
- Also, Toronto is not an island. I'm told Montreal *is* and island.
- Draw your own conclusions... ;-)
-
- Like I keep telling, YOU DO NOT KNOW THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE MAJORITY
- OF QUEBEC. NO ONE DOES. The only way to find out is to have a
- referendum. Unless you've done when I wasn't looking, you cannot
- state the point of view of the majority because you do not know what
- it is. You can only state your own point of view.
-
- THE MORAL: Stop using I/we in your posts when refering to Quebec.
- YOU ARE NOT QUEBEC. You are Denis Beauregard. One
- person. One vote.
-
- >I am not a politician, I have no power control nor politics control.
-
- Amen to that. ?-)
-
- >So, in the limited domain of opinion, I can speak for Quebec.
-
- In the limited domain of opinion, you can only speak for yourself.
-
- Edgar "bla, bla, bla,..." Matias
-
-