home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SWIRL.MONSANTO.COM!GIBES
- Message-ID: <9207290114.AA19760@tin.monsanto.com>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 20:14:07 -0500
- Reply-To: Kernon Gibes <gibes@SWIRL.MONSANTO.COM>
- Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.BITNET>
- From: Kernon Gibes <gibes@SWIRL.MONSANTO.COM>
- Subject: RE: writing variable names to external file
- Comments: To: SAS-L@uga.cc.uga.edu@tin.monsanto.com
- Comments: cc: GIBES@tin.monsanto.com
- Lines: 24
-
- CONTENT: Question on a question
- SUMMARY: Why should TRANSPOSE skip variable names?
- REL/PLTF: not applicable (fyi - that's RELease / Platfrom )
- E-ADDR: gibes@swirl.monsanto.com
- NAME: Kernon Gibes
- PHONE: (708) 506-2873
- DATE/TIME: 28 July 1992, 8:22 p.m. CDT
-
- Steve Wickham wrote:
-
- <stuff deleted>
- >due to the transpose. The transposed variables all have the same prefix, but
- >the also have a number that ranges between 0 - 99, but not consecutively.
- >Confused? An example:
- >DATE RIVER SITE ORDER1 ORDER3 ORDER5 ORDER17 ORDER9 ORDER85
- <stuff deleted>
-
- Sorry Steve but I'm less interested in your original question than in
- why TRANSPOSE would be doing this (besides you already have a couple of
- fine answeres). In my experience, TRANSPOSE doesn't skip variables but
- of course if you look at a CONTENTS ORDER17 comes before ORDER9, etc.
- However, this wouldn't explain what happened to ORDER2 assuming your
- example was completely real. Anyway, I would be interested in knowing
- what TRANSPOSE code gives rise to this behavior. TIA.
-