home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UKANVM.BITNET!LHNELSON
- From: LHNELSON@UKANVM.BITNET (LHNELSON --UKANVM)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.history
- Subject: RE: Fidel Castro on Racism
- Message-ID: <HIST-L%92072714221919@UKANVM.BITNET>
- Date: 27 Jul 92 19:21:09 GMT
- Sender: History <HISTORY@RUTVM1.BITNET>
- Lines: 43
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- In-Reply-To: note of 07/27/92 13:11
-
- Hello, Rich;
-
- True, and well-said. My point is not that race or blood or caste is per se a
- determinant of character or personality, and so I am not really concerned
- whether or not such a case can be argued. Let us grant, however, that
- ethnicity -- involving as it does matters of stature, skin color, diet,
- language, social values, and so forth -- effectively distinguishes one group
- from another. That distinction is the basis of racism, and it is often a
- factor, primary or purely rhetorical, in social strife.
-
- Your characterization of Buthelezi is quite correct, but you ignore the
- rhetoric with which he regales his followers. And please don't say that it's
- _only_ rhetoric, since rhetoric instills belief, and belief leads to action. I
- would qualify my statement, but repeat, that _many_ Zulus feel that they would
- fare poorly under a Bantu regime.
-
- Your point about the heterogenity of the Bantu is quite correct, but it is
- equally true that Bantu are distinct from Zulu in language, custom, and
- historical tradition. And a part of that tradition is subjection of Bantus and
- overlordship of Zulus. It is also correct that the White population of the
- United States is heterogenous, but the history of its relationship with a
- Black minority is no different for that fact.
-
- It is also true that the White government and its sympathizers both exacerbate
- and emphasize the danger of ethnic violence, but there are also some, like
- myself, who hold no truck with the South African government who are concerned
- about the ethnic undercurrents that underlie much of the political strife
- there. Even self-serving statements can be true. Churchill argued that Britain
- should not leave India because of the ethnic and religious violence that would
- "inevitably erupt." That was propaganda to support Britain's maintaining
- control of the Raj. The consequences he predicted, however, were quite true.
-
- I, too, hope that I have not, and am not, offending anyone. I do believe,
- hoever, that historians have the obligation of considering every factor that
- comes into play, and that it is too simple to decide a priori that one factor
- or another, such as political or economic, is decisive, and that all other
- considerations are derivative, illusory, or inconsequential.
-
- Lynn
-
- Lynn_Nelson
- Department of History
- University of Kansas
-