home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!ox-prg!oxuniv!wilcox
- From: wilcox@vax.oxford.ac.uk
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: right time
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.110112.7781@vax.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: 24 Jul 92 10:01:12 GMT
- References: <Brr6t4.83F@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <SLAGLE.92Jul21232846@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
- Organization: Oxford University VAXcluster
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <SLAGLE.92Jul21232846@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com>, slagle@lmsc.lockheed.com (Mark Slagle) writes:
- > In article <Brr6t4.83F@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, baron@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Dennis Baron) writes:
- >
- >> Neither expert opted for `a quarter till,' presumably because
- >> they considered it dialect (=South Midland). But what's a
- >> well-intentioned consulter of usage experts to do in such a
- >> case?
- >
- > A quarter before seven.
- Or whatever sounds right to you. In this neck of the woods the
- alternatives are "six forty-five" and "a quarter to seven."
- Anything else is understood, but understood to be local dialect
- or foreign.
-
- Incidentally, is there any part of the English speaking world other
- than small areas of Yorkshire (Sheffield and Batley specifically) in
- which it is usual to substitute "while" for "'till" or "to" in such
- phrases as "I have a class from two [while, 'till] four?
-
- I've got two friends who use this construction, and it took me several
- years to get used to it.
-
- --
-
- Stephen Wilcox | Remember what happened to the dinosaurs!
- wilcox@maths.oxford.ac.uk | I did---and look what happened to me.
-