home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!news
- From: slagle@lmsc.lockheed.com (Mark Slagle)
- Subject: Re: Ex-presidents' titles and adverbs of location
- Message-ID: <SLAGLE.92Jul23174954@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
- Reply-To: slagle@lmsc.lockheed.com
- In-reply-to: tchrist@convex.COM's message of 23 Jul 92 22:39:56 GMT
- Sender: news@iscnvx.lmsc.lockheed.com (News)
- Organization: You wouldn't ask this if you'd seen my desk.
- References: <1992Jul17.150134.2935@desire.wright.edu> <sav.711871356@nanette>
- <SLAGLE.92Jul23140228@sgi417.msd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
- <1992Jul23.223956.19890@news.eng.convex.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 00:49:59 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Jul23.223956.19890@news.eng.convex.com>, tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) writes:
-
- > Sorry, but there's absolutely reason to rearrange those sentences,
-
- Yes, you're right. There is absolutely reason to rearrange
- those sentences. But that's not even the point. They were
- adduced as evidence of the superiority or necessity of ending
- a sentence with at.
-
- There, I got another one into the discussion at.
- --
- ----
- Mark E. Slagle PO Box 61059
- slagle@lmsc.lockheed.com Sunnyvale, CA 94088
- 408-756-0895 USA
-