home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!news.cs.indiana.edu!bronze!psygate.psych.indiana.edu!nate
- From: nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu (Nathan Engle)
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: re: Name-calling in the abortion battle (media bias?)
- Keywords: bias
- Message-ID: <nate.388@psygate.psych.indiana.edu>
- Date: 27 Jul 92 16:23:07 GMT
- References: <1992Jul23.031505.27129@seq.uncwil.edu> <1992Jul23.141201.23367@afit.af.mil> <1992Jul24.022144.18386@seq.uncwil.edu> <4068@news.duke.edu> <1992Jul24.191756.11280@kadsma.kodak.com> <l72vv5INNd3o@roundup.crhc.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: news@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Psych Department, Indiana University
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mushroom.psych.indiana.edu
-
- sunder@altair.crhc.uiuc.edu (Srinivas Sunder) writes:
- >pajerek@telstar.kodak.com (Don Pajerek) writes:
- >|> After all, hearing 'anti-abortion', you know that a) the subject is
- >|> abortion, and 2) the person described is against it. 'Pro-life' is not
- >|> nearly as succinct.
-
- >How does the term "pro-choice" meet the same specifications? "Pro-abortion
- >rights" is a lot closer to the mark.
-
- Someone must be reading this at National Public Radio. Just for the
- interest of all you NPR-bashers out there, I heard a report on the news
- this morning in which they described a rally attended by several hundred
- "abortion rights activists".
-
- --
- Nathan Engle Software Juggler
- Psychology Department Indiana University
- nate@psygate.psych.indiana.edu nengle@copper.ucs.indiana.edu
-