home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.revisionism:616 soc.history:6650 talk.politics.misc:35755
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!ubc-cs!mala.bc.ca!oneb!kmcvay
- Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.history,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Dershowitz on Debating with Holocaust Deniers
- Message-ID: <1992Jul24.070004.15770@oneb.almanac.bc.ca>
- From: kmcvay@oneb.almanac.bc.ca (Ken Mcvay)
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 92 07:00:04 GMT
- Followup-To: alt.revisionism
- Organization: The Old Frog's Almanac, Vancouver Island, CANADA
- Keywords: dershowitz
- Lines: 56
-
- Alan Dershowitz on debates: Washington Times, 2/14/92
-
- "Despite the incontrovertible evidence of the Holocaust--the Nazis
- themselves documented many of the killings--there are cruel bigots
- who are trying to convince naive people that the Holocaust is a
- 'myth' perpetuated by Jews 'promulagating anti-German hate propadanda--
- Bradley Smith and his ilk have been trying to turn an incontestable
- historical fact into a 'debatable issue.'
-
- "The Holocaust-deniers realize that they cannot win the debate during
- this century. They envision a two-step process; the first is to make
- the truth of the Holocaust a debateable issue; the second is to win
- the debate in the next century; when the victims and perpetrators of
- the Holocaust are all dead.
-
- "As part of this process, Mr. Smith has tried to buy full-page
- advertisements in college newspapers. These ads call for 'open debate'
- on whether the Holocaust occured. Invoking currently voguish language
- about 'campus thought police,' and 'political correctness,' Mr. Smith
- say students should be 'encouraged to investigate the Holocaust
- story the way they are encourated to investigate every other historical
- event'.
-
- "I agree with that formulation. The Holocaust should be studied in the
- same way that 'every other historical event' is studied. American
- slavery is studied, but no one 'debates' whether there were slaves,
- because that is not a debateable issue. The detention of Japanese
- Americans during WWII is studied, but there is no debate about
- whether this historical event occured, because it is not debateable.
- Who killed Kennedy is debatable, but not whether Kennedy is still alive,
- as some tabloids have claimed. The occurrence or non-occurrence of
- a universally accepted historical event does not become a legitimate
- issue for academic debate just because some crackpot says it is
- debateable. An initial burden of persuasion must be satisfied before
- a ludicrious 'idea' is given the imprimatur of reasonable debatibility.
- Holocaust denial has not come close to meeting the preliminary burden.
-
- ...
- "Recently, Mr. Smith invited me to debate whether the Holocaust
- occurred. He knows he cannot win, but he would like to be able to say
- that Alan Dershowitz regards the issue as worthy of debate. I have
- written him that I will debate the Holocaust, but only as part of
- a series on the following subjects: (1) that slavery did not exist
- in America, (2) that Elvis Presley is still alive and (3) that the
- Earth is flat. That is the company of crackpot 'ideas' into which
- Holocaust denial comfortably fits."
-
- Alan Dershowitz is a professor of law at Harvard Univeristy.
-
- <Followups to alt.revisionism>
-
- --
- Josef Kramer, a man whose incumbency earned him the sobriquet "The Beast of
- Belsen," treated the uncontrollable epidemic of diarrhea at Belsen with a
- prescription of starvation. "If you don't eat," he said, "you don't shit."
- "The more dead Jews you bring me," he noted, "the better I like it."
-