home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.models
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!rosie.uh.edu!st1ec
- From: st1ec@rosie.uh.edu (Tse, Oliver)
- Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
- Message-ID: <30JUL199200233734@rosie.uh.edu>
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Sender: usenet@menudo.uh.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rosie.uh.edu
- Organization: University of Houston
- References: <ceRQsFC00WB3Ab_V8W@andrew.cmu.edu> <13659@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> <1992Jul29.182156.7928@advtech.uswest.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 05:23:00 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Jul29.182156.7928@advtech.uswest.com>, rray@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com (Randy J. Ray) writes...
- >ACtually, it was originally proposed (back in '89 or so) as rec.models.misc.
- >Without degenerating into a flame war, can we discuss this point? This is one
- >of the things I want to iron out during the discussion period, before the
- >voting takes place...
-
- The "rec.models.scale" name is just fine. It describes in general terms all
- aspects of traditional "scale" modeling. I suppose this would also include
- the small number of wooden model ship builders in addition to the very large
- number of plastic modelers. Everything in "scale" would fit this description
- even some of the "scale" R/C ships. I vote "yes" for "rec.models.scale."
-
- Oliver
- st1ec@rosie.uh.edu
-
-
-