home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.models:982 rec.models.railroad:1481 rec.models.rc:3076 rec.models.rockets:1961 news.groups:16196
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu
- From: rick@crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H. Miller)
- Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
- Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
- Message-ID: <13683@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
- Date: 29 Jul 1992 23:13:47 GMT
- References: <ceRQsFC00WB3Ab_V8W@andrew.cmu.edu> <13659@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> <1992Jul29.182156.7928@advtech.uswest.com>
- Sender: usenet@bcm.tmc.edu
- Followup-To: alt.models
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu
-
- In article <1992Jul29.182156.7928@advtech.uswest.com>, rray@lookout.it.uswc.uswest.com (Randy J. Ray) writes:
- >
- > ACtually, it was originally proposed (back in '89 or so) as rec.models.misc.
- > Without degenerating into a flame war, can we discuss this point? This is one
- > of the things I want to iron out during the discussion period, before the
- > voting takes place...
- >
- > Me, I'll just be happy when we have our rec group, whether it's .scale or
- > ..misc. I'll still post kit reviews, I'll still try to answer new modelers'
- > questions as well as I can... I just want us to go beyond the alt realm...
-
-
- No reason for flames.....I think creating the misc group is overdue. What I
- would suggest is to create misc and then if the scale model overwhelms the
- discussion break it off and form scale.
-
-
-
-
-
- --
- Richard H. Miller Email: rick@bcm.tmc.edu
- Asst. Dir. for Technical Support Voice: (713)798-3532
- Baylor College of Medicine US Mail: One Baylor Plaza, 302H
- Houston, Texas 77030
-