home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.models:972 rec.models.railroad:1472 rec.models.rc:3068 rec.models.rockets:1952 news.groups:16175
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!spdcc!dirtydog.ima.isc.com!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!spud!weimer
- From: weimer@spud.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Gary Weimer 726-3370)
- Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
- Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
- Message-ID: <1992Jul29.200811.466@pixel.kodak.com>
- Date: 29 Jul 92 20:08:11 GMT
- Article-I.D.: pixel.1992Jul29.200811.466
- References: <ceRQsFC00WB3Ab_V8W@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Jul29.135449.5007@schbbs.mot.com> <1992Jul29.182733.15633@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Sender: news@pixel.kodak.com
- Reply-To: weimer@pixel.kodak.com
- Organization: Eastman Kodak Co.; Rochester, NY
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Jul29.182733.15633@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, sdejour@mksol.dseg.ti.com (stewart l dejournett) writes:
- |>
- |> I am wondering why you need a seperate group to discuss scale matters, so
- |> far I have seen little or no discussion on it in this forum and if it was
- |> there and I was not interested I could just skip it.
- |>
- |> Please give me some reasons why scale discussions can NOT coexist in this
- |> group unless the scale folks think they just need to be on their own???
-
- What is "this forum"? Notice that this was cross-posted to 5 different
- groups. Judging from one of the previous posts, "scalers" are being
- forced to hang out in alt.models. Just the fact that many site
- administrators refuse to carry alt.* groups should have some bearing on
- the outcome if there is consistent traffic on the subject (I only read
- rec.models.rc, so I don't know...).
-
- --
-
- weimer@ssd.kodak.com ( Gary Weimer )
-