home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.models:1002 rec.models.railroad:1497 rec.models.rc:3106 rec.models.rockets:1984 news.groups:16243
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!zazen!daffy!uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod
- From: zaphod@madnix.uucp (Ron Bean)
- Newsgroups: alt.models,rec.models.railroad,rec.models.rc,rec.models.rockets,news.groups
- Subject: Re: RFD: rec.models.scale
- Summary: An alternative to .misc
- Message-ID: <1992Jul31.020412.16155@madnix.uucp>
- Date: 31 Jul 92 02:04:12 GMT
- References: <ceRQsFC00WB3Ab_V8W@andrew.cmu.edu> <13659@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
- Organization: ARP Software
- Lines: 14
-
- rick@crick.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu (Richard H. Miller) writes:
-
- >Actually, since most models are by definition 'scale', I would proposed instead
- >to filll the hole in the rec.models hierarchy and go ahead and propose
- >
- > rec.models.misc
-
- How about rec.models.building. This would cover all types of
- materials and techniques, but would obviously exclude control
- systems and powerplants, which I think was the original intent.
-
- ==================
- zaphod@madnix.UUCP (Ron Bean)
- uwvax!astroatc!nicmad!madnix!zaphod
-