home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu!ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu!masdough
- From: masdough@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Dough the Demented)
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Subject: Re: Useless Bots, Vanity Ops ?
- Message-ID: <Bs0nvx.4B7@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: 26 Jul 92 23:02:00 GMT
- References: <1992Jul25.121950.4815@ms.uky.edu> <avalon.712175185@coombs> <Bs0HoA.27y@acsu.buffalo.edu> <1992Jul26.212638.7966@ctr.columbia.edu>
- Sender: nntp@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Organization: University at Buffalo
- Lines: 30
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu
-
- In article <1992Jul26.212638.7966@ctr.columbia.edu>, dougmc@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Doug McLaren) writes...
- >In article <Bs0HoA.27y@acsu.buffalo.edu> masdough@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Dough the Demented) writes:
- >
- >Hmmm ... I get it ... Perl bots are ok.
-
- Who said anything about Perl.. (mine is in C)
-
- >IRCII bots must die on sight. (nothing personal, Mr. Demented Dough ... I'm
- >not saying that you believe this, but other people have certainly implied it,
-
- I have no objections against any bots... except those that kick me :)
-
- >and you felt the need to defend your bot against it, so ... )
-
- Nope.. just proud of my work.
-
- >The IRC client may not be the most efficient way of doing
- >something, CPU cycles-wise, but who really cares?
-
- You're sysop might.. but, then that is none of my business...
-
- Personally, some of the bots that i have encountered are far less obnoxious
- than some of the people that I have met..
-
- Although, I feel that there should be a standard way of recognizing a bot..
-
- (a name type thing.. so people can keep them off channels if they don't like
- them)
-
- Dough
-