home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Personal Computer World Interactive 1996 October
/
pcwoct96.zip
/
pcwoct96
/
HTML
/
ROOM
/
STUFF
/
RANTS
/
_WRI0716.TMP
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-07-11
|
4KB
|
74 lines
<meta created by Ben Eveling 100545.1475@compuserve.com>
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>
A ben template page
</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" background=../graphics/rants.gif TEXT="#000000" LINK="#39ff80" VLINK="#444444" ALINK="#000000">
<font size="3">
<P>
<table border=0 cellspacing=3>
<tr><td colspan=1 align=right>
<b>
In much the same way that HAL, the menacing computer in the film 2001, was supposed to be a superior
computer to any IBM, because it's letters were all one better than the then world's greatest computer
manufacturer IBM, must have been at the back of Larry Ellison mind when coming up with the naff
acronym nc (network computer). Whether or not he thought it was two better is either pure madness
or complete arrogance, but either way it's more than a mild coincidence.<p></td>
<td valign=top><img src=graphics/rantlogo.gif><br>
<font size=4 color=ff0000><b>John Barnes ventures a timid opinion <br>as to whether online everything and <br>
dumb terminals are necessarily a fantastic idea</font></b><p>
</td></tr>
<tr><td colspan=2><b>
In my opinion it's at least two or three times worse than the PC and certainly ten times more
menacing than HAL. In fact it may well make HAL look like a complete Dick Van Dyke of a computer,
all smiles and no real substance, whilst it will become an utter child catcher of a machine, friendly
at first and but a real enemy within; to draw out a poorly thought out and painful Disney
analogy.<p>
Why? Because it will make all of us slaves to the telecoms companies who regularly take tea and
Mr Kipling cakes with the devil. Just when you were thinking that the internet, for all it's faults
and pretentious hippy evangelists was starting to liberate networks in datacoms version of the love
and peace movement, the nc comes a long and bursts the happy bubble.<p>
True to form the press are all full of how wonderful it all is and no-one seems to have stopped and
asked some fundamental questions such as 'why replace a throbbing turbo charged machine for an under
powered pile of crap that relies on the telecoms network for all it's intelligence?'
Or Why pay $500 for a box of nothing when you've got a perfectly good networked computer already?
But after all the press thought Frank Bough only took his coke in liquid form until he discovered
the real thing! <p>
For corporates the questions are even more pointed as many of you will have spent the best part of
the last ten years replacing all those costly and unreliable dumb terminals with powerful networked
PCs only to find that it didn't quite fit in with Mr E's vision of the future. Obviously what you
are going to do now is through is all away, put NC's on the desktop and try, unsuccessfully, along
with all the other suckers to buy shares in BT, Mercury, AT&T and all the other telecoms companies
that make money.<p>
Maybe I'm talking out of turn as the concept is great. A super cheap computer that chucks out all the
over blown operating systems we have all bemoaned for the last decade, in place of a micro kernel
operating system that is truly open and relies on component based programs and applets instead of
piles of apps stuffing your now redundant hard drive. But where does all the functionality come
from? The net. And how difficult is it to get onto successful sites like Netscape or Yahoo on a
Friday afternoon when all the Californians are looking for colostomy bags and silicon implants? <p>
About as easy as finding a Californian without a colostomy bag or a silicon implant - that's how easy.
So will the machine really cost $500? I'd say that the running costs alone will make the old
chubby, bloated, passΘ PC look like a free gift, and the connectivity costs and on-line time will
start to resemble the spreadsheet from hell as you buckle under the weight of demand after demand.<p>
Clearly the big vendors see the PC as a technology to pass down the line as production and
distribution costs get bigger and margins get smaller, and the nc must look like a gift horse for
them. on top of this they all know that communications is the market to conquer and grow the empires
of the next century around. Sadly for you, they'll do it worth your help unless you think carefully.
Which would definitely put a different twist on the familiar 'serf the net'.
</td></tr>
</table>
</BODY></HTML>