OS/2 Shareware BBS: Security/Security.zip/kerbefaq.zip/KERBEROS.FAQ

Internet Message Format | 2003-03-13 | 37KB

From ankh.iia.org!babbage.ece.uc.edu!news.kei.com!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!uunet!noc.near.net!pad-thai.aktis.com!suan-la-chow-show.aktis.com!not-for-mail Sun Aug 28 10:17:11 1994
Path: ankh.iia.org!babbage.ece.uc.edu!news.kei.com!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!uunet!noc.near.net!pad-thai.aktis.com!suan-la-chow-show.aktis.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Barry Jaspan)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kerberos,comp.answers,news.answers
Subject: Kerberos Users' Frequently Asked Questions 1.10
Supersedes: <kerberos-faq/[e-mail]>
Followup-To: poster
Date: 25 Aug 1994 15:55:54 -0400
Organization: OpenVision Technologies
Lines: 808
Approved: [e-mail]
Expires: 22 Sep 1994 19:55:53 GMT
Message-ID: <kerberos-faq/[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: suan-la-chow-show.aktis.com
Summary: This document answers Frequently Asked Questions about the
    Kerberos authentication system.  Read this before you post a
    question to comp.protocols.kerberos or [e-mail].
Xref: ankh.iia.org comp.protocols.kerberos:860 comp.answers:3348 news.answers:10027

Archive-name: kerberos-faq/user
Version: 1.10

Kerberos Users' Frequently Asked Questions
August 25, 1994
Compiled by: Barry Jaspan, <[e-mail]>
             OpenVision Technologies

     Kerberos; also spelled Cerberus.  n.  The watch dog of
     Hades, whose duty it was to guard the entrance--against
     whom or what does not clearly appear; . . . it is known
     to have had three heads. . .

        -Ambrose Bierce, The Enlarged Devil's Dictionary

This document answers Frequently Asked Questions about the Kerberos
authentication system.  It is freely distributable.  Direct all
responses and questions to [e-mail].  Most of the
information presented here has been collected from postings to the
comp.protocols.kerberos newsgroup (gatewayed to the mailing list
[e-mail]).

DISCLAIMER: OpenVision Technologies makes no representations about the
suitability of this information for any purpose.  It is provided "as
is" without express or implied warranty.  In particular, this document
is not intended as legal advice for exporting Kerberos, DES, or any
other encryption software.

Release Notes: Answer 1.7 has been updated with information from Joe
Pato.  There is a new entry for TGV, Inc. in the Kerberos vendor list.

Questions addressed in this release:

1.  Kerberos and its Many Incarnations
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1.1)    What is Kerberos?  What is it good for?
(1.2)    Where can I get Kerberos version 4 or 5?
(1.3)    What is the current status of version 4?
(1.4)    What is the current status of version 5?
(1.5)    Are version 4 and version 5 compatible?
(1.6)    How/why is Transarc's Kerberos different from MIT Kerberos V4?
    Can they interoperate?
(1.7)    How/why is OSF DCE Security different from MIT Kerberos V5?
    Can they interoperate?
(1.8)    How/why is DEC Ultrix Kerberos different from MIT Kerberos V4?
    Can they interoperate?
(1.9)    What is Bones?  What is it for?

2.  Using and Administering Kerberos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(2.1)    Can I use Kerberos for local password validation?
(2.2)    What is the export status of Kerberos?
(2.3)    How can I delete a principal from the database?
(2.4)    What are the officially assigned Kerberos port numbers?
(2.5)    Are there Kerberos versions of telnet and ftpd?
    What other Kerberos clients exist?
(2.6)    Why does rlogin print "Warning: No Kerberos tickets obtained"?
(2.7)    What operating systems has Kerberos been ported to?
    What vendors provide commercial support for Kerberos?

3.  Building and Installing Kerberos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(3.1)    Why do I get an error message from ld when make_commands is
    executed?
(3.2)    Why doesn't KRB5_defs.h exist when I build version 5?
(3.3)    What is libkrb.a, and why can't ld find it?

4.  Miscellaneous
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(4.1)    List references for Kerberos and network security in general.
(4.2)    Where are archives of comp.protocols.kerberos (a.k.a
    [e-mail])?

======================================================================

1.  Kerberos and its Many Incarnations
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1.1)    What is Kerberos?  What is it good for?

Kerberos is a network authentication system for use on physically
insecure networks, based on the key distribution model presented by
Needham and Schroeder.[3] It allows entities communicating over
networks to prove their identity to each other while preventing
eavsdropping or replay attacks.  It also provides for data stream
integrity (detection of modification) and secrecy (preventing
unauthorized reading) using cryptography systems such as DES.

Kerberos works by providing principals (users or services) with
/tickets/ that they can use to identify themselves to other principals
and secret cryptographic keys for secure communication with other
principals.[1] A ticket is a sequence of a few hundred bytes.  These
ticket can then be embedded in virtually any other network protocol,
thereby allowing the processes implementing that protocol to be sure
about the identity of the principals involved.

Practically speaking, Kerberos is mostly used in application-level
protocols (ISO model level 7), such as TELNET or FTP, to provide user
to host security.  It is also used, though less frequently, as the
implicit authentication system of data stream (such as SOCK_STREAM) or
RPC mechanisms (ISO model level 6).  It could also be used at a lower
level for host to host security, in protocols like IP, UDP, or TCP
(ISO model levels 3 and 4), although such implementations are
currently rare, if they exist at all.

It is important to realize that Kerberos is a one-trick pony.  It
provides for mutual authentication and secure communication between
principals on an open network by manufacturing secret keys for any
requestor and providing a mechanism for these secret keys to be safely
propagated through the network.  Kerberos does not, per se, provide
for authorization or accounting, although applications that wish to
can use their secret keys to perform those functions securely.
Kerberos also does not provide password validation for individual
workstations unless care is taken; see question 2.1.

It is also important to understand the using Kerberos on time-sharing
machines greatly weakens its protections, since a user's tickets
are then only as secure as the 'root' account (read: not very).
Furthermore, dumb terminals and most X terminals do not understand the
Kerberos protocol and as a result their cable connections remain
insecure.

(1.2)    Where can I get Kerberos version 4 or 5?

In the United States and Canada (*), Kerberos is available via
anonymous FTP from athena-dist.mit.edu (18.71.0.38).  For specific
instructions, cd to pub/kerberos and get the file README.KRB4 (for
version 4) or README.KRB5_BETA4 (for version 5).  Note that *YOU WILL
NOT BE ABLE TO RETRIEVE KERBEROS WITHOUT READING THIS FILE*.

Outside the United States, you can get Bones via anonymous ftp from
ftp.funet.fi (128.214.6.100) in pub/unix/security/kerberos.  A DES
library is available from the same place.  See question 1.9 for
information on Bones.

(*) Kerberos and DES can be exported to Canada.  See question 2.2.

(1.3)    What is the current status of version 4?

With the release of patch level 10 on December 10, 1992, MIT Kerberos
4 is now in its final form.  MIT does not anticipate ever making a new
Kerberos 4 release.

Several vendors provide their own versions of Kerberos which may
contain improvements or extensions; see question 2.7.

(1.4)    What is the current status of version 5?

The newest version of MIT Kerberos V5 is beta 4 patchlevel 2, released
10 August 1994.  It contains numerous bug fixes, a new build system
based on autoconf rather than imake, hand-coded ASN.1 parsers so that
ISODE is not required, and many other additions and improvements.  MIT
tested it on Ultrix, SunOS, Solaris, and Linux, and it has already
been ported to other platforms.

See question 1.2 for instructions on acquiring it.

(1.5)    Are version 4 and version 5 compatible?

No.  Versions 4 and 5 are based on completely different protocols.
The MIT Kerberos V5 distribution contains some compatibility code,
however: (a) there is a library which converts Kerberos V4 library
calls into Kerberos V5 requests, so you can run many V4 programs in a
V5 environment by relinking; (b) the Kerberos server can optionally
service V4 requests; (c) there is a program to convert a V4 format
Kerberos database to a V5 format database.  The names used by the V5
library have a prefix "krb5_" so they do not conflict with the V4
library.

(1.6)    How/why is Transarc's Kerberos different from MIT Kerberos V4?
    Can they interoperate?

This is a fairly complex question, and this answer is known to be
incomplete.  The issue is regularly discussed on the
[e-mail] mailing list; send mail to the -request
list for subscriptions.

Years ago, the designers of AFS decided to implement their own
security system based on the Kerberos specification instead of using
the (then, not yet publicly available) MIT Kerberos V4.  As a result,
Transarc's AFS Kerberos speaks a different protocol but also
understands the MIT Kerberos V4 protocol.  They can, in principal,
talk to each other; however, there are a sufficient number of annoying
details and an insufficient number of advantages such that it may not
be practical.

The two versions use a different string-to-key function (the algorithm
that turns a password into a DES key); the AFS version uses the realm
name as part of the computation while the MIT version does not.  A
program that uses a password to acquire a ticket (e.g.  kinit or
login) will only work with one version, unless it is hacked up to try
both string-to-key algorithms.

The two versions also use a different method of finding Kerberos
servers.  MIT Kerberos uses krb.conf and krb.realms to map hostnames
to realms and realms to Kerberos servers.  AFS kaservers for a realm,
by definition, are located on the AFS database servers and can
therefore be located using /usr/vice/etc/CellServDB.  This means that
a program built using the MIT Kerberos libraries will look in one
place for the information while a program built using the AFS Kerberos
libraries will look in another.  You can certainly set up all three
files and use both libraries, but be sure that everything is
consistent.

The two versions have a different password changing protocol, so you
must use the correct 'kpasswd' program for the server you are talking
to.  In general, AFS clients that talk directly to the kaserver use an
Rx-based protocol, instead of UDP as with MIT Kerberos, so those AFS
clients cannot talk to an MIT server.

In summary, AFS Kerberos and MIT Kerberos can interoperate once you've
acquired a ticket granting ticket, which you can do with kinit (MIT)
or klog (AFS).  With a tgt, Kerberos applications such as rlogin can
talk to an MIT or AFS Kerberos server and achieve correct results.
However, it is probably best to pick one implementation and use it
exclusively

(1.7)    How/why is OSF DCE Security different from MIT Kerberos V5?
    Can they interoperate?

DCE Security is based on Kerberos V5, and uses the same wire protocol.
However, applications from two systems use the protocol in different
ways, so the actual interoperability is limited.  Furthermore, DCE
Security started from an early alpha release of V5 and the two
versions have developed independently; there are therefore some minor
incompatibilities that MIT and the OSF have agreed to resolve.  [Time
frame?]

The DCE Security Server, secd, listens on UDP port 88 for standard
Kerberos requests and responds appropriately.  Therefore, clients of
MIT Kerberos can operate in a DCE environment without modification,
assuming the DCE Security database contains the appropriate principals
with the correct keys.

An MIT Kerberos V5 server cannot replace the DCE Security Server,
however.  First, DCE applications communicate with secd via the DCE
RPC.  Second, the DCE security model includes a Privilege Server (PS)
that fills in the authorization field of a principal's ticket with
DCE-specific data, and the DCE Security Server has a PS built in.  In
order for the MIT Kerberos V5 server to support DCE clients it would
need to talk to a stand-alone PS and, although the necessary
information is available, no such PS presently exists.

As an additional complication, the DCE does not officially export the
Kerberos V5 API; it only exports a DCE Security-specific API.
Individual vendors are capable of providing the Kerberos V5 API if
they wish, but unless they all do (which seems unlikely) Kerberos V5
API applications will not be compile-time portable to pure DCE
environments; only binaries will continue to work.

[Does secd provide all features of the MIT Kerberos server?  Is it
guaranteed to do so?]

(1.8)    How/why is DEC Ultrix Kerberos different from MIT Kerberos V4?
    Can they interoperate?

DEC ULTRIX contains Kerberos for a single reason, namely, to provide
authenticated name service for the ULTRIX enhanced security option.
It does not support user-level authentication in the normal manner.

DEC's version is essentially the same as (and derived from) MIT
Kerberos V4 with a few changes.  The most significant change is that
the ability to perform any kind of end-to-end user data encryption has
been eliminated in order to comply with export restrictions.  Minor
changes include the placement of ticket files (/var/dss/kerberos/tkt
vs. /tmp) and the principal names used by some standard Kerberos
services (e.g.: kprop vs. rcmd); there are probably other minor
changes as well.

These changes make it annoying but not impossible to use DEC ULTRIX
Kerberos in the normal way.  However, there is no reason at all to do
so, because the MIT distribution supports ULTRIX directly.  [This may
not be completely true.  I imagine that using ULTRIX Kerberos for
enhanced security and MIT's Kerberos at the same time would cause
problems.  Has anyone tried this?]

(1.9)    What is Bones?  What is it for?

Bones is a system that provides the Kerberos API without using
encryption and without providing any form of security whatsoever.  It
is a fake that allows the use of software that expects Kerberos to be
present when it cannot be.

Why does it exist?  Kerberos is a network security system which relies
on cryptographic methods for its security.  Since Kerberos' encryption
system, DES, is not exportable, Kerberos itself cannot be exported or
used outside of the United States in its original form.  (See question
2.2 for more information.)

As a partial solution to this problem, the Kerberos source code was
modified by the addition of #ifdef NOENCRYPTION around all calls to
DES functions.  Compiling this version with the symbol NOENCRYPTION
defined results in a system that looks like Kerberos from an
application's point of view but that does not require DES libraries
(and, as a result, does not speak the real Kerberos protocol and does
not provide any security).

The final piece in this puzzle is a program called "piranha" which
takes the Kerberos sources and removes all of the calls to the
encryption routines, replacing it with the code which was under #ifdef
NOENCRYPTION, producing the system known as Bones.  Bones has the
property that there is absolutely no question about whether or not it
is legal to transport its sources across national boundaries, since it
neither has any encryption routines nor any calls to encryption
routines.

#ifdef NOENCRYPTION was not documented, and it was only intended to be
used in the above manner.  Someone who tries compiling Kerberos with
that #define has in some sense "voided the warranty", and will get
something which is both (a) not secure and (b) not Kerberos.

2.  Using and Administering Kerberos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(2.1)    Can I use Kerberos for local password validation?

Yes, but only under certain circumstances and only if you are
careful.

Requests for Kerberos ticket granting tickets (tgts) (e.g. from kinit
or login) are sent in plaintext to the Kerberos server, which then
responds with credentials encrypted in the requesting principal's
secret key.  The program then attempts to decrypt the data with the
supplied password and considers the authentication "successful" if the
decryption appears to yield meaningful results (such as the correct
principal name).

The problem here is that the requesting program cannot know for sure
whether the decryption succeeded or, more importantly, whether the
response actually came from the Kerberos server.  An attacker could,
for example, walk up to an unattended machine and "log in" as a
non-existent user.  Kerberos will eventually respond with an
appropriate error, but the attacker can arrange for another program to
deliver a fake response to login first; he then types the correct
password (which he knows because he created the fake response in the
first place) and succeeds in spoofing login.

The solution to this problem is for login to verify the tgt by using
it to acquire a service ticket with a known key and comparing the
results.  Typically, this means requesting an rcmd.<hostname> ticket,
where <hostname> is the local hostname, and checking the response
against the key stored in the machine's /etc/srvtab file.  If the keys
match then the original tgt must have come from Kerberos (since the
key only exists in the srvtab and the Kerberos database), and login
can allow the user to log in.

The solution works only so long as the host has a srvtab containing an
rcmd.<hostname> (or any other standard principal) entry.  This is fine
for physically secure or single-user workstations, but does not work
on public workstations in which anyone could access the srvtab file.

(2.2)    What is the export status of Kerberos?

[ This answer was written by John Gilmore of Cygnus Support.  It is
not intended as legal advice and may contain errors. ]

The export status of Kerberos is unclear, largely because the export
regulations are unclear in general.  There's an overview of cryptography
export cases in http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/export.html .

Export of technology is controlled by both the State Department and by
the Commerce Department.  The two agencies' jurisdictions don't
actually legally overlap, but nobody really knows which agency has
jurisdiction over which products.  So there is a process by which you,
as a potential exporter, can ask the State Department which agency
controls your particular export.  It's called a Commodity Jurisdiction
Request or CJR.  There is a "CJR Kit" for helping you to file CJR's
available at ftp://ftp.cygnus.com/pub/export/cjr.kit .

The State Department has the power to regulate exports of even
publicly available (published) materials, in apparent contradiction to
the First Amendment.  The Commerce Department regulations (Commerce
Control List) specifically exempts publicly available materials from
export controls (section 779.3), allowing their export under `General
License' GTDA, which requires no paperwork and is usable by everyone
except a few hundred people or companies who have abused export
controls in the past.  The State Department regulation (International
Traffic in Arms Regulations, or ITAR) exempts `public domain
information' (22 CFR 120.11) but fails to define `information'.  The
State Department takes the position that software is not
`information'.

Kerberos is an authentication system, and export of authentication
software and hardware is controlled by the Commerce Department.
However, the State Department has never formally said where the line
between authentication and encryption is, so they are also apparently
interested in Kerberos.

Cygnus Support filed a CJR for the Kerberos Bones software, and got
back a formal notification that it was controlled by the Commerce
Dept.  We then filed a CCATS request with the Commerce Department, and
eventually found out that it is exportable to all destinations without
paperwork under the GTDA license (because it is `publicly available'
without charge on the Internet).  The formal documents are in
ftp://ftp.cygnus.com/pub/export .  This just confirms what we all
suspected anyway -- if you take the crypto out of Kerberos (which is
how the Bones were generated), it's exportable.  The Bones are
available at ftp://athena-dist.mit.edu/pub/kerberos; look at
README.ftp for instructions.

Several companies, including DEC, have apparently gotten export
licenses for *binaries* of Kerberos.  The DECathena product is
licensed this way.  However, they had to make unspecified changes to
the code, removing entry points that would allow people to do
arbitrary encryption.

As for the exportability of full strength Kerberos in source code,
nobody has apparently applied for this.  (Please let us know if
you know of a case.)

I believe that the best bet for threading the export maze is to define
and defend Kerberos as an authentication product, to get it past the
State Department, and then to show that it is publicly available, to
get it past the Commerce Department.  To do this, you actually have to
be trying to export a publicly available version of Kerberos, though.

There is a bill pending in U.S. Congress, HR 3627, by Rep. Maria
Cantwell, which would make export of Kerberos (and all other mass
market and publicly available crypto software) legal.  Statements of
support sent by email to `[e-mail]' will be forwarded to Ms.
Cantwell.  So far more than 5,000 such statements have been forwarded.
More info on the bill is available at
ftp://ftp.eff.org/Alerts/berman_cantwell.alert .  See also
ftp://ftp.eff.org/eff/Issues/Crypto and Issues/Export .

Canada is considered a part of the United States for export control
purposes so Kerberos can be exported to Canada without problems.

As for other countries besides the U.S., few countries control the
export of encryption software, and even fewer control the import or
use of encryption inside their countries.  Most of the countries that
signed the COCOM treaty, before it was dissolved, controlled
cryptography as a ``dual use'' item, meaning that commercial products
that use crypto are fine, but military products are controlled as
weapons.  There is a master list of crypto export control regulations
compiled by George Washington University researchers, available from
the Software Publishers' Association.

Copies of the Kerberos Bones with DES routines and calls added back in
by foreign programmers are called `eBones', and are available by
anonymous FTP from machines in Sweden, Germany, Israel, Finland,
Australia, and France (so far); check with "archie".

(2.3)    How can I delete a principal from the database?

MIT Kerberos V4 does not include a single command to delete a Kerberos
principal.  This was an intentional omission based on the assumption
that by making deletion difficult, accidents were less likely to
happen.  If you want to delete a principal, do "kdb_util dump", edit
the ASCII dump with an editor, and do a "kdb_util load".  Obviously,
you can write a shell script to make this more convenient.

The admin tools for AFS Kerberos, MIT Kerberos V5, and the DCE
Kerberos have a simple delete request.

(2.4)    What are the officially assigned Kerberos port numbers?

The file src/prototypes/services.append in the MIT Kerberos
distribution contains the commonly used port assignments.  This file
is not the whole story, however.

"kerberos" has officially been moved to port 88, although people will
have to listen on port 750 for some time to come, and assume
that many servers won't be converted to listen to port 88 for some
time.

"kerberos_master" and "krb_prop" have not been reserved, but they are
only used for intra-site transactions so having them reserved probably
isn't necessary.  Furthermore, both of their port numbers have already
been assigned to other services, so requesting an official assignment
will force them to change.

"eklogin", "kpop", and "erlogin" have not been officially reserved,
but probably should be.  Their ports are not currently assigned to
other services, so hopefully they will not have to change if an
official assignment is requested.

(2.5)    Are there Kerberos versions of telnet and ftpd?

(a) TELNET.  An experimental Telnet Authentication Option has been
defined, and is described in RFC1416.  A separate document, RFC1411,
describes how that option is to be used with Kerberos V4, but no RFC
exists for its use with Kerberos V5.  These RFC's only define how
/authentication/ is to be performed; the standard for full encryption
is still under development.

An implementation of Kerberos V4 telnet is available via anonymous ftp
from ftp.uu.net, in /networking/telnet.91.03.25.tar.Z, but it predates
both of the above-mentioned RFCs and is therefore almost certainly not
compliant with them.  A Kerberos V5 telnet implementation, based on
the 4.4BSD telnet/telnetd, also exists but has been temporarily
removed from the MIT V5 beta 2 release (probably because it also does
not comply with the proposed standards).

(b) FTP.  The IETF Common Authentication Technology (CAT) Working
Group has published the Internet Draft "FTP Security Extensions"
<draft-ietf-cat-ftpsec-05.txt> which defines Kerberos V4 and GSS-API
authentication systems.  Source code for a Kerberos V4 ftp/ftpd with
the extensions is available via anonymous FTP:

    thumper.bellcore.com:pub/lunt/ftp_ftpd.tar.Z

Please note that the extensions are still in the Draft stage and may
change at any time, in incompatible ways.

(2.6)    Why does rlogin print "Warning: No Kerberos tickets obtained"?

Kerberos rlogin uses a standard Kerberos exchange to prove the
identity of the user to the remote host, after which it uses the
/etc/passwd and a .klogin file to determine whether the user is
authorized to log in.

Since the user never types a password, klogind on the remote host
cannot obtain a new ticket granting ticket.  The user's existing tgt
cannot be used on the remote host, because MIT Kerberos V4 tickets are
host-specific.  Therefore, even though the user has logged in to the
remote host, there is no ticket granting ticket for the user available
on the remote host.  The warning message is merely a reminder of this
fact.

The most recent release of MIT Kerberos V4 (patchlevel 10) contains a
system called "rkinit" that allows a user to obtain a ticket granting
ticket on a remote machine.  Using this system, it is possible first
to obtain a tgt on a machine and then log into it with Kerberos
rlogin, thereby achieving a secure remote login with tickets.
Alternatively, you use Kerberos V5 which has forwardable tickets.
However, forwardable tickets do not seem to work in the current
release of MIT Kerberos V5.

(2.7)    What operating systems has Kerberos been ported to?
    What vendors provide commercial support for Kerberos?

The Kerberos vendor's list is maintained as a public service and is
not intended as advertising.  Any vendor can submit an entry.  Entries
will be edited for form and style.  Obviously, all of the "Added
value" sections are incomplete; call the vendor for details.

NOTE: The current author of this list works for OpenVision
Technologies, Inc.

----------------------------------------

Vendor:        Cygnus Support
Product:    Cygnus Network Security (CNS)
Contact:    Simon Elphick
        [phone]  voice
        [phone]  fax
        [e-mail]
Last update:    4/20/94

Base version:    MIT Kerberos 4
Added value:

    o technical support
    o easier configuration and building
    o much improved documentation
    o many bug fixes
    o full source code and easy-to-install binaries provided
    o still freely available sourceware -- not proprietary

Availability:

    SPARC / SunOS 4.1.3:        available
    SPARC / Solaris 2.3:        available
    Sun-3 / SunOS 4.x        available
    DECstation / Ultrix 4.2a    available
    IBM RS/6000 / AIX 3.2        available
    SGI / IRIX 4 and 5        available
    i386 / SCO 3.2v4        available
    HPPA / HPUX 8.07        available

    PC / Windows 3.1        beta test July '94 (client only)
    Macintosh / System 7        beta test July '94 (client only)

Free availability of the CNS software:

    To obtain a copy of Cygnus Network Security, fax a request to:
        [phone]

    To satisfy export restrictions, the fax should state that you are a
    U.S./Canadian citizen or permanent resident, and that the software is
    exclusively for use in the United States/Canada.

    Cygnus will reply with information on how to access the CNS source,
    binaries and documentation through anonymous ftp.

Future plans:
    o MIT Kerberos 5 in December 94

----------------------------------------

Vendor:        Digital Equipment Corporation
Product:    DECathena
Contact:    Susanna Wood
        [phone]
        [e-mail]
Last update:    4/11/94

Base version:    MIT Kerberos 4

    o integration into DECathena
    o available world-wide

Availability:

    Alpha AXP OSF/1        available
    DECstation Ultrix 4.x    available
    VAXstation Ultrix 4.x    available
    SunOS 4.x        available
    HP-UX            available (client only)
    RS/6000 AIX        available (client only)
    MS-DOS            available (client only)
    Windows            available (client only)

Notes:
    o requires INGRES/SQL
    o requires PC-NFS with MS-DOS or Windows

Future plans:
    o MIT Kerberos 5

----------------------------------------

Vendor:        OCSG, CyberSAFE Corporation
Product;    OCSG Kerberos
Contact:    Gene Egan
        [phone]
        [e-mail]
Last update:    4/1/94

Base version:    MIT Kerberos 5
Added value:

    o forwardable tickets from rlogin, rcp, and rsh
    o Kerberos 4 compatibility for rlogin, rcp, and rsh
    o installation system
    o administration GUI
    o token card integration (Security Dynamics SecureID Card)
    o DEC GSS-API

Availability:

    SunOS 4.x:        available
    Solaris 2.3:        available
    IBM RS/6000 AIX 3.2.5:    available
    HP 9000 HP-UX 9.0:    available
    NEXTSTEP 3.2 for Intel:    available
    DEC Ultrix 4.3:        available

    Microsoft Windows 3.1:    available
    MS-DOS 6.0:        available
    Macintosh System 7:    available
    OS/2:            available in May '94
    NT:            available in June '94

Future plans:
    o Support for additional platforms
    o Kerberos Telnet, FTP, and AFS

----------------------------------------

Vendor:        OpenVision Technologies, Inc.
Product:    OpenV*Secure
Contact:    Gregg Lebovitz
        [phone] (voice)
        [phone] (fax)
        [e-mail]
Last update:    4/20/94

Base version:    MIT Kerberos 5
Added value:

    o administration server (not based on Sandia's kadmin)
    o easy-to-use remote administration GUI
    o security policies (password minimum and maximum lifetime,
    expiration, minimum length, character class mix, and history)
    o Kerberos 4 compatibility
    o OpenVision GSS-API (now part of the standard MIT release)
    o Full documentation set
    o 24x7 support

Availability:

    SunOS 4.1.3:    available
    Solaris 2.3:    available
    HP-UX 9.01:    available
    AIX 3.2:    available

Future plans:
    o FTP security with GSS-API
    o Authorization
    o Integration with other OpenVision products

----------------------------------------

Vendor:        TGV, Inc.
          101 Cooper Street
          Santa Cruz, CA  95060
Product:    MultiNet V3.3
Contact:    [phone]
        [e-mail], [e-mail]
Last update:    7/15/94

Base version:    MIT Kerberos 4

Availability:

    DEC OpenVMS (VAX and Alpha AXP): available

3.  Building and Installing Kerberos
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(3.1)    Why do I get an error message from ld when make_commands is
    executed?

The make_commands program (from the file util/ss/make_commands.c,
around line 101) spawns ld as part of its normal operation.  The
arguments to ld are hard-coded into the exec() call and are not
correct for all systems.  To fix the problem, examine the call and
determine the correct arguments for your environment; once you know
the correct arguments, the change to the source code will be obvious.

(3.2)    Why doesn't KRB5_defs.h exist when I build version 5?

KRB5_defs.h, and other files like KRB5_tables.c, KRB5-types.h, and
KRB5_pre_defs.h are created by the ISODE ASN.1 compiler, pepsy, from
KRB5.py.  You therefore need to have ISODE built and you have to
configure your site.def file so that the Makefiles know how to run the
pepsy compiler.

Note that there's a bug in Sun's imake/cpp setup, so the Makefile that
is generated in lib/asn.1 is broken.  KRB5-types.h is generated by the
ISODE program pepsy; look in the makefile just before pepsy is called.
It's fairly obvious where a tab character is missing.

(3.3)    What is libkrb.a, and why can't ld find it?

The MIT Kerberos V5 server (krb5kdc) can operate in a V4 compatibility
mode in which it accepts and responds to standard V4 requests (see
question 1.5).  In order to do so, it needs the V4 Kerberos library,
libkrb.a.  That library is not part of the V5 distribution.  It is
assumed that if you want V4 compatibility you already have V4 built
and installed; see question 1.2 for information on obtaining V4.

To get krb5kdc to link properly, set the KRB4LIB variable in site.def
to the path of your V4 library.  If you do not need V4 backwards
compability, comment out the definition of Krb4KDCCompat in site.def.
(Be sure to run "make clean" after changing anything in site.def to
make sure everything is rebuilt correctly according to the new
parameters.)

4.  Miscellaneous
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(4.1)    List references for Kerberos and network security in general.

See the bibliography at the end of this document.

(4.2)    Where are archives of comp.protocols.kerberos (a.k.a
    [e-mail])?

Archives are available via anonymous FTP from athena-dist.mit.edu in
the directory pub/kerberos/krb-mail.  The [e-mail]
archives prensently extend up to the end of 1992.  Some archives of
the kerberos protocol mailing list are also available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The FTP site for a reference, when known, is listed in square brackets
following the entry.  Yes, I know that these are not in Officially
Blessed Bibliography Format.  Sue me.

[1] Jennifer G. Steiner, Clifford Neuman, Jeffrey I. Schiller.
"Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Open Network Systems", USENIX
Mar 1988.  [athena-dist.mit.edu:pub/kerberos/doc/usenix.PS]

[2] S. P. Miller, B. C. Neuman, J. I. Schiller, and J. H. Saltzer,
"Kerberos Authentication and Authorization System", 12/21/87.

[3] R. M. Needham and M. D.  Schroeder, "Using Encryption for
Authentication in Large Networks of Computers," Communications of the
ACM, Vol.  21(12), pp. 993-999 (December, 1978).

[4] V. L. Voydock and S. T. Kent, "Security Mechanisms in High-Level
Network Protocols," Computing Surveys, Vol.  15(2), ACM (June 1983).

[5] Li Gong, "A Security Risk of Depending on Synchronized Clocks",
Operating Systems Review, Vol 26, #1, pp 49--53.

[6] S.M. Bellovin and M. Merritt, "Limitations of the Kerberos
Authentication System," USENIX Jan 1991.
[research.att.com:dist/internet_security/kerblimit.usenix.ps]

[7] Refik Molva, Gene Tsudik, Els Van Herreweghen, and Stefano Zatti,
"KryptoKnight Authentication and Key Distribution System."
[jerico.usc.edu:pub/gene/kryptoknight.ps.Z]

[8] C. Neumann and J. Kohl, "The Kerberos Network Authentication
Service (V5)," RFC 1510, September 1993.
--
Barry Jaspan, [e-mail]
OpenVision Technologies