home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.barnyard.co.uk
/
2015.02.ftp.barnyard.co.uk.tar
/
ftp.barnyard.co.uk
/
cpm
/
walnut-creek-CDROM
/
MBUG
/
MBUG121.ARC
/
INFO-CPM.ARK
/
INFO-CPM.004
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1988-08-07
|
33KB
|
836 lines
Received: from SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL (TCP 3200000112) by MC.LCS.MIT.EDU 25 Sep 88
07:26:26 EDT
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 88 01:30:19 MDT
From: INFO-CPM-REQUEST@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Reply-To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Subject: INFO-CPM Digest V88 #213
To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
INFO-CPM Digest Sun, 25 Sep 88 Volume 88 : Issue 213
Today's Topics:
Z-80 Unix? (5 msgs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 23 Sep 88 19:53:02 GMT
From: cadnetix.COM!cadnetix!rusty@uunet.uu.net (Rusty)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
In article <2906@mipos3.intel.com> dbraun@cadavr.UUCP (Doug Braun ~) writes:
....
>I wrote one a couple of years ago. It is a totally from-scratch
implementation
>of the Unix kernel for a 64K CP/M machine. It runs just fine on my machine,
>being able to support the 7th edition shell with no problems. I would be
>glad to mail the source code or post it to the net.
>
POST! POST! well, email if not enough people agree, but I seriously doubt
that will happen.
>The kernel was completely written by me, but unfortunately I cannot legally
>distribute...
Maybe we can figure a way around this?
----
Rusty Carruth UUCP: {uunet,boulder}!cadnetix!rusty DOMAIN:
rusty@cadnetix.com
Cadnetix Corp. (303) 444-8075x296 \ 5775 Flatiron Pkwy. \ Boulder, Co 80301
Radio: N7IKQ 'home': P.O.B. 461 \ Lafayette, CO 80026
------------------------------
Date: 24 Sep 88 07:20:48 GMT
From: ucsdhub!ucrmath!jantypas@ucsd.edu (John Antypas)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
>In article <278@pte.UUCP>, car@pte.UUCP (Chris Rende) writes:
>> In his book "The Unix Operating System" Kaare Christian mentions that Unix
>> exists for Z-80. This was a big suprise to me. I didn't know that Unix ran
>> on any 8 bit CPU's.
>>
>> Does anyone know anything about Unix running on a Z-80?
>
>Whitesmiths may have done IDRIS for the Z80.
Indeed they did, but I wouldn't exactly call it Unix. Our labs use Idris
because we must, and the C alone is semi-Unix-like if you look at it
just the right way. They rewrote litterally 90% of the libraries. Truly
non-portable code!
------------------------------
Date: 22 Sep 88 00:46:54 GMT
From: tetra!budden@nosc.mil (Rex A. Buddenberg)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
Doug,
This looks really interesting.
1. Suggest you consider uploading to Simtel20 or similar where
we can get at it. This is assuming, as you implied, that your
work is for public domain.
2. What are implications for the follow-on Z-80 derivative chips
like HD64180 and Z-280? How portable are we here? If you can make
things work in a 64k RAM space, life ought to get easier if you can
lay hands on more RAM... Somehow sounds like an awkward fit though
until you get hardware memory management to take a lot of the load off
your code...muse,muse,muse.
Rex Buddenberg
------------------------------
Date: 22 Sep 88 21:09:13 GMT
From: pilchuck!ssc!markz@uunet.uu.net (Mark Zenier)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
In article <278@pte.UUCP>, car@pte.UUCP (Chris Rende) writes:
> In his book "The Unix Operating System" Kaare Christian mentions that Unix
> exists for the Z-80. This was a big suprise to me. I didn't know that Unix
ran
> on any 8 bit CPU's.
>
> Does anyone know anything about Unix running on a Z-80?
Whitesmiths may have done IDRIS for the Z80.
------------------------------
Date: 23 Sep 88 14:32:14 GMT
From: mcvax!ukc!stc!datlog!dlhpedg!cl@uunet.uu.net (Charles Lambert)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
In article <842@vsi.UUCP> friedl@vsi.UUCP (Stephen J. Friedl) writes:
>
>Morrow was a God in the Z80 world but he stayed in it too long when
>the IBM PC came out :-(.
He should've emigrated. Alan Sugar is still wringing cash out of the little
monster in Europe :-)
----------
Charlie
------------------------------
End of INFO-CPM Digest
******************************
Received: from SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL (TCP 3200000112) by MC.LCS.MIT.EDU 26 Sep 88
05:36:44 EDT
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 88 01:30:54 MDT
From: INFO-CPM-REQUEST@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Reply-To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Subject: INFO-CPM Digest V88 #214
To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
INFO-CPM Digest Mon, 26 Sep 88 Volume 88 : Issue 214
Today's Topics:
MARC
Z-80 Unix?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 1988 08:24 MDT
From: "Frank J. Wancho" <WANCHO@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: MARC
For the record, Ed Ziemba did the principal work in developing MARC, a
Unix-like OS for the Z80, collaborating with Lauren Weinstein and Leor
Zolman (of BDS-C fame), among others. After Ed died in an unfortunate
and untimely snorkling accident, Lauren picked up the work. Toward
the end of 1982, Lauren's hard disk failed, and he had to resort to
using floppy disks to regenerate the system - a slow and painful
process.
MARC required a working CP/M BIOS to use as the device interface and
provided a combination of a V6/V7 interface, an extensively reworked
runtime BDS-C library, a version of MINCE, the EMACS-like editor
from Mark of the Unicorn, and the ability to run well-behaved CP/M
programs.
Attached to the end of this message are two messages from Lauren
submitted in November 1983 announcing the demise of MARC and the
reasons why.
--Frank
--------------------
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 83 1:11:29 EST
From: R. Bruce Natalie (CTAB) <rbn@brl-vgr>
To: info-micro@brl-vgr, info-cpm@brl-vgr
Subject: [lauren: status report message]
Lauren Weinstein has sent me the following message regarding the
MARC software package. For those of you who don't know, MARC is
an attempt to get as much of UNIX as you can on a 8080 based system.
This message was forwarded to me as list maintainer because he was
uncertain whether it would be viewed as a commercial statement and
thus be a prohibitted use of the DDN. I find this note to be of the
informational type, which is one of the primary purposes of this list
and therefore am forwarding it on his behalf.
Mr Weinstein's mailing address is:
<vortex!lauren@rand-unix>
Ron Natalie
INFO-MICRO-REQUEST@BRL-VGR
INFO-CPM-REQUEST@BRL-VGR
---------
A very brief status report on MARC:
Due to various technical problems, the rapidly advancing state of the
art in software and affordable hardware, and a variety of
marketing considerations, the MARC software project has been
terminated. No further work is taking place on the software, and the
MARC software package will henceforth not be sold or distributed in
any manner.
Persons with specific questions on this topic may feel free to contact
me, but the decision is irrevocable. Thanks much.
--Lauren--
Date: Thursday, 10 Nov 1983 16:56-PST
Realname: Lauren Weinstein
To: INFO-CPM@brl
Subject: Erroneous information from hp-pcd!craig about MARC
From: lauren@rand-unix
I sincerely hope that this will be my last message on this topic.
I don't know what hp-pcd!craig has been smoking, but his information
regarding MARC is absolutely and totally wrong and confused.
There isn't any "George" at Vortex. I AM VORTEX. VORTEX IS ME. Period.
I will NOT be selling or distributing MARC in any manner.
The MARC software project has been terminated.
MARC was designed only for the 8080/Z80 processors and there
have never been any plans to distribute a MARC for the 68000 or any other
processors. In point of fact, the overwhelming percentage of software
in the MARC software package is written in a non-standard 8080 assembler
and is most decidedly NOT portable in any manner.
To be blunt, the system was not really usable as other than a toy.
Performance with floppies was miserable and could not be reasonably improved.
Even with hard disks, many operations were extremely slow. The system
could NOT make use of additional memory over 64K in any manner, and
the useful workspace for user programs ended up being only around 30K,
sometimes even less. CP/M compatibility did not function properly
for about 75% of currently tested CP/M programs.
The MARC software package is fundamentally limited by its original
design parameters, and has no future beyond hardware which
is rapidly heading into oblivion -- and, as I stated, it doesn't
work well enough even on that hardware.
There are a variety of software products from various vendors on
the market which can provide much of the MARC functionality
in a much more reasonable manner, and which won't ignore the entire
base of existing CP/M software in the process. Microshell and Software
Tools are two obvious examples of reasonable approaches to the
problem of providing such an environment on limited machines.
There are also packages which can make effective use of bank-switched
memory and provide for much faster disk access, which should help
to provide functionality for that hardware which MARC could not and cannot
provide.
MARC was a good effort but is just too fundamentally limited by the
underlying hardware base for which it was designed and written.
It is just "too much" for such hardware -- the operating system
takes up so much of the memory and disks that there just isn't
anything reasonable left for the humans! Also very important
is the fact that MARC's being written mostly in 8080 assembler
made it difficult to maintain and modify and essentially impossible
to take forward into the future in the rapidly changing micro marketplace.
You might be interested to know that of the people I've talked to about
the termination of the project, the vast majority admitted that they
were planning to try upgrade to newer hardware (usually with lots
more memory and usually running a fullblown multiprocess Unix
or real multiprocess Unix look-alike system) in the near future.
Most of the people (few as they were) who sounded the most disappointed
were those with hardware that would not reasonably run MARC in any case.
However, the bottom line is that bugs and poor performance would
require so much more code to fix properly that the remaining memory
space would be made even smaller and less useful!
I don't sell *or* distribute software with which I am not happy.
I never sold a single copy of the MARC software package because
I refused to send out buggy and limited software. It doesn't
matter whether the package was going to cost $0 or $500, I simply
refuse to distribute software with which I am dissatisfied.
I've spent a large amount of time on the project, and
I'm not happy about the final outcome -- but it's time to
face reality on this topic. It was fun trying, anyway, but I've
made my decision and it is final -- I need to get on with my life
and try to make a living!
I really have nothing more to say about this. That's all, folks.
--Lauren--
====================
------------------------------
Date: 24 Sep 88 17:30:27 GMT
From: vsi!friedl@uunet.uu.net (Stephen J. Friedl)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
In article <427@ucrmath.UUCP>, jantypas@ucrmath.UUCP (John Antypas) writes:
> >
> >Whitesmiths may have done IDRIS for the Z80.
>
> Indeed they did, but I wouldn't exactly call it Unix. Our labs use Idris
> because we must, and the C alone is semi-Unix-like if you look at it
> just the right way. They rewrote literally 90% of the libraries. Truly
> non-portable code!
In the early days, Whitesmiths felt they were In Charge of C
programming. Above, `rewrote 90% of the libraries' means that
the usage and function names were different as well. For example:
putfmt("The number is %i\n", i);
replaced your good old printf. After a time, they released a
compatible library, but it was likely due to outrage. I have
never in the meantime seen such a blatant example of gratuitous
incompatibility. What is surprising is that this came from
the man who cowrite _Elements of Programming Style_, P.J.
Plauger. Sad.
My memory is a bit dated on the details, corrections welcome.
Steve
--
Steve Friedl V-Systems, Inc. +1 714 545 6442 3B2-kind-of-guy
friedl@vsi.com {backbones}!vsi.com!friedl attmail!vsi!friedl
------[I'm on vacation in Ohio from 26-Sep to 10-Oct 1988]----------
------------------------------
End of INFO-CPM Digest
******************************
Received: from SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL (TCP 3200000112) by MC.LCS.MIT.EDU 8 Oct 88
03:06:20 EDT
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 88 01:30:17 MDT
From: INFO-CPM-REQUEST@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Reply-To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Subject: INFO-CPM Digest V88 #215
To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
INFO-CPM Digest Tue, 27 Sep 88 Volume 88 : Issue 215
Today's Topics:
Where is Turbo Pascal???
z-80 unix and unix-"like" shells
ZCPR on CP/M 3.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 88 15:23 EST
From: Timothy Stark <11TSTARK%GALLUA.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Subject: Where is Turbo Pascal???
Hello,
Last summer, someone said me that Borland discontinue to sell
Turbo Pascal language but I want that. When Borland discontinue
it, they should place them into public domain. Are you agree with that?
I heard that Some companies discontinue Fortran compilers to CP/M
users. I tried to order it at PD Copying Software, Inc and I made it!
I now have Fortran Compiler 3.44 include Macro-80 that is better language
for most pd softwares that require. I am happy with it. It will cost
$39.95 plus postage and shipping. (For C128 users, ask conversion to
DD format for $4 fee (2 disks)). Sorry, I did not remember company's phone
no.
-- Tim Stark
+=============================================================================+
| Timothy Stark | BitNet: 11TSTARK@GALLUA.BITNET |
| Gallaudet University | Internet: 11tstark@gallux.gallaudet.edu |
| P.O. Box 1453 | UUCP: ...!psuvax1!gallua.bitnet!11tstark |
| Washington, DC. 20002 | CSNET: 11TSTARK%GALLUA.BITNET@RELAY.CS.NET |
| USA | QLink: TimS18 |
+=============================================================================+
"The deaf people called the only university for the deaf."
------------------------------
Date: 26 Sep 88 06:17:35 GMT
From: portal!cup.portal.com!Carra_its-me_Bussa@uunet.uu.net
Subject: z-80 unix and unix-"like" shells
bandy@well.UUCP (Andrew Scott Beals) writes...
[stuff]
> Another effort in the unix look-alike class is the Cromix operating
> system from Cromemco. Yes, they're still in business and they still
> maintain a uucp site. They make postings every once in a while.
> I'm not sure that Cromix runs on a z80, but I have heard that it
> does. Cromix also runs on Cromemco's 68000 machines and a port was
FYI, Cromix v11 _DOES_ run on a Z80. I worked for the local Cromemco store
here and we had it back then. As a matter of fact, I was at the VPs house
last night and he was busy connecting it via modem to his PC clone. Whipping
up his own quick and dirty XMODEM transmitter in C to Procomm 2.4.2.
Cromix/Z80 uses bank swapping--the first 64K is for the OS, other 64K banks
are used for CP/M & CDOS tasks. REAL Cromix tasks can share a single 64K
bank if they are relocatable-binary. The C compiler he has for it is pitiful..
Slow as xmas, but it works!! Three pass from C to ASM, then to OBJ (?) then
a link to .BIN (whew! usoft/borland runs a little faster now-a-days! :-)
)
Cromix v20 and up used a Z80 AND a 68000 processor; it could figure out what
you were trying to run and select the correct processor.
If anybody has any Cromemco stuff they'd like to sell (or buy!) drop me a
line and I'll have Steve get in touch w/you.
carra bussa @ cup.portal.com
PS - somebody ported Cromix to an AMIGA??? Hell, that'd almost be worth having!
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 88 13:51 EDT
From: RLH <HAAR%gmr.com@RELAY.CS.NET>
Subject: ZCPR on CP/M 3.0
Some time ago, I saw that Plu*Perfect was taking over distribution
of some ZCPR software ( I think Echelon folded up). I am interested
in the auot-install version of ZCPR for CP/M 3.0 systems.
Does this really exist? has anyone used it? What about experience with
Plu*Perfect in general?
My system is an S-100 bus "boat-anchor" with a Tarbell Z-80 ( extended
addressing) running CP/M Plus (v. 3.0) in 192K of RAM using a BIOS
that I customized for my own peculiar collection of I/O boards. I
am not deterred by some assembly code hacking or BIOS customization,
but I don't want to get stuck with an unsupported, buggy program
without documentation.
Any words of wisdom would be appreciated.
Bob Haar, HAAR@GMR.COM (CSNET) or (313) 986-1412 (voice)
------------------------------
End of INFO-CPM Digest
******************************
Received: from SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL (TCP 3200000112) by MC.LCS.MIT.EDU 1 Oct 88
17:14:06 EDT
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 88 01:30:38 MDT
From: INFO-CPM-REQUEST@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Reply-To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Subject: INFO-CPM Digest V88 #216
To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
INFO-CPM Digest Wed, 28 Sep 88 Volume 88 : Issue 216
Today's Topics:
add
NEC 8500 RAM Cart. & Tech. Info
Unix for Z80 machines
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 27 Sep 88 15:15 EDT
From: GND-XD @ DDN3.arpa
Subject: add
please add this address to the distribution list.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 88 15:10:21 PDT
From: secrist%msdsws.DEC@decwrl.dec.com (Richard Secrist, Digital Equip. Corp.
USA)
Subject: NEC 8500 RAM Cart. & Tech. Info
Roger, etal.:
An excellent source of any NEC 8500 (8xxx) peripherals at
the best prices is Daniel Cohen, P.O. Box 237, Plymouth NH
03264, 800/338-1839. His prices vary according to whatever
lot he's purchased recently, but he is very honest, quick,
and knowledgeable. Keep in mind NEC made several models
of RAM cartridge, so the number vary. If you tell him what
you want to plug it into and he says it works he doesn't
lie. Standard disclaimers.
Technical information on the '8500 (Starlet, etal.) is
available from the Technical Support department of NEC.
Contact Kelly Ryan at 800/632-7875. They won't sell it
to you but if you sign a confidential disclosure agreement
with NEC their recent policy was to give it to you for free.
The 8500 has a 56K TPA available when you plug in a RAM
cartridge and configure it as your A: drive (otherwise the
cartridge looks like B:). All you do is plug in the cartridge,
format it with the built-in FORMAT, and switch TPA-modes using
the built-in OPTION program, and you're up. The directory
track is stored funny so directory-munging programs don't,
otherwise it's pretty much what you'd expect.
rcs
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 88 13:18:04 MET
From: Jos Grote Punt <U448025%HNYKUN11.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU>
Subject: Unix for Z80 machines
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Could you please send your Unix-verion for Z80 machines? Maybe you can also
send it to the SIMTEL20 archives. A lot of people here are interested in
your program. Is it easy to adapt it to different hardware? Is it also pos-
sible to compile it with another C-compiler ?
Thanks in advance,
Jos Grote Punt
Faculty of Medicine
University of Nymegen
The Netherlands
Address on BITNET: U448025@HNYKUN11
------------------------------
End of INFO-CPM Digest
******************************
Received: from SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL (TCP 3200000112) by MC.LCS.MIT.EDU 8 Oct 88 03:39:08 EDT
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 88 07:19:48 MDT
From: INFO-CPM-REQUEST@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Reply-To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
Subject: INFO-CPM Digest V88 #217
To: INFO-CPM@SIMTEL20.ARMY.MIL
INFO-CPM Digest Mon, 3 Oct 88 Volume 88 : Issue 217
Today's Topics:
CP/M-Z80 on UNIX??
IMP control
Looking for software: PL/M
Tandon disk drives lose upper head
UNIX on Z80 (2 msgs)
want CP/M for Northstar Horizon
Z-80 Unix? (3 msgs)
z-80 unix and unix-"like" shells (2 msgs)
Z80MU
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 29 Sep 88 22:06:56 GMT
From: njsmu!mccc!pjh@princeton.edu (Pete Holsberg)
Subject: CP/M-Z80 on UNIX??
I would like to be able to run CP/M on a UNIX PC (68010 CPU). Is there
an emulator available? Is there some source code I could hack from a
CP/M-680x0 emulator for a non-UNIX system?
Thanks.
Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Technology Division ...!att!jonlab!mccc!pjh
Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800
------------------------------
Date: Tuesday, 27 September 1988 20:11-MDT
From: killer!bobc@AMES.ARC.NASA.GOV (Bob Calbridge)
Subject: IMP control
I'm trying to use my little C-128 to connect to a mainframe via modem.
I'm using a 1670 modem and IMP for my communications. The problem is
that the mainframe requires a break signal to wake up the port. Is it
possible to do this with IMP? I've done it using the vt100-128 program
provided on the disk that came with the modem but the program as a whole
sucks swamp water.
Much thanks in advance.
Bob
------------------------------
Date: 30 Sep 88 04:27:42 GMT
From: morris@jade.Berkeley.EDU (Mike Morris)
Subject: Looking for software: PL/M
I've recently stumbled across some old software written in PL/M, and
would like to be able to make some changes. The target machine is a
Z-80 process control system (actually an amateur radio repeater control
system), the test system is an IMSAI 8080 S-100 system, and the software
development system will be a PClone or the IMSAI. The ideal would be to
find a complete package somewhere. As far as I know, it is not
available from DR any more...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#INCLUDE DISCLAIMER.STANDARD
The opinions above probably do not even come close to those of my employer(s).
US Snail: ...............UUCP: .........................Also:
Mike Morris .............morris@Jade.JPL.NASA.gov ..... WA6ILQ
P.O. Box 1130
Arcadia, Ca. 91006-1130
------------------------------
Date: Monday, 26 September 1988 09:29-MDT
From: att!petsd!pedsga!jeffj@UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU
Subject: Tandon disk drives lose upper head
[spritzensparken!]
I have had two Tandon TM-848-02 floppy drives fail recently.
(half height DSDD 8")
Both failed the same way.
They worked as double sided, then the upper head failed.
Now they cannot read nor write the upper side,
but function okay as single sided.
The heads look fine.
What went wrong? Can I fix it easily and cheaply?
(Remember that new drives are $50 at computer fairs).
Thanks for your assistance.
Jeffrey Jonas
allegra!io!mtune!petsd!pedsga!jeffj
decvax!mcnc!rutgers!petsd!pedsga!jeffj
------------------------------
Date: 26 Sep 88 15:07:13 GMT
From: emcard!stiatl!meo@gatech.edu (Miles O'Neal)
Subject: UNIX on Z80
If you don't come up with an acceptable UNIX for the Z80,
I recommend ZCPR3 over something like IDRIS. It aint UNIX,
but its more of an OS than CPM or DOS.
=====================================================================
Miles O'Neal decvax!gatech!stiatl!meo
------------------------------
Date: Monday, 26 September 1988 22:13-MDT
From: eve.usc.edu!mlinar@oberon.usc.edu (Mitch Mlinar)
Subject: UNIX on Z80
In article <446@stiatl.UUCP> meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) writes:
>If you don't come up with an acceptable UNIX for the Z80,
>I recommend ZCPR3 over something like IDRIS. It aint UNIX,
>but its more of an OS than CPM or DOS.
Of course, just about anything is better than IDRIS, including CPM let
alone the after market stuff in PD as well as commercial stuff that has
been around for years.
Regarding UN*X like OSes for banked memory systems, there is also QPLUS
which is more of an OS than CPM, DOS, or ZCPR3. Not well advertised,
though. And the demo PD version is somewhat stripped down from the
commercial package.
But, then again, I am biased as I helped write a good chunk of it.
-Mitch
------------------------------
Date: Monday, 26 September 1988 05:50-MDT
From: njsmu!telesci!lunar!larry@princeton.edu
Subject: want CP/M for Northstar Horizon
Does anybody know where I can get CP/M for a Northstar Horizon computer?
My mom acquired one and wants to use it.
Larry Fenske
uunet!vsedev!tlxprs!lunar!larry
------------------------------
Date: 28 Sep 88 19:54:30 GMT
From: cbmvax!hutch!rabbit1!tom@rutgers.edu (Tom Donohue)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
In article <865@vsi.UUCP>, friedl@vsi.UUCP (Stephen J. Friedl) writes:
> In the early days, Whitesmiths felt they were In Charge of C
> programming. Above, `rewrote 90% of the libraries' means that
> the usage and function names were different as well. For example:
>
> putfmt("The number is %i\n", i);
>
> replaced your good old printf. After a time, they released a
> compatible library, but it was likely due to outrage.
At the time (~1979), I beleive Whitesmiths was afraid of incurring
the wrath of AT&T. Copyrights and such. Perhaps they were overly
cautious, or perhaps it was a valid concern. I don't know where
I heard this, but it wasn't from Whitesmiths, so take it with a grain
of salt.
--
-- tom ...!{rutgers,uunet}!cbmvax!hutch!tom
------------------------------
Date: 29 Sep 88 01:53:26 GMT
From: attcan!nebulus!root@uunet.uu.net (Dennis S. Breckenridge)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
In article <2906@mipos3.intel.com>, dbraun@cadavr.intel.com (Doug Braun ~) writes:
> In article <278@pte.UUCP> car@pte.UUCP (Chris Rende) writes:
> >In his book "The Unix Operating System" Kaare Christian mentions that Unix
> >exists for the Z-80. This was a big suprise to me. I didn't know that Unix ran
> >on any 8 bit CPU's.
>
> If anybody would like to look at this stuff, let me know, and I will
> dig out the disks and figure out how to upload them.
>
> Doug Braun Intel Corp CAD
> 408 765-4279
>
> / decwrl \
> | hplabs |
> -| oliveb |- !intelca!mipos3!cadev4!dbraun
> | amd |
> \ qantel /
I tried to send you mail directly but it bounced from mordor - joyce.
Subject: UNIX Z80
Hi Doug, I seen you posting for the source for z80 UNIX (tm) and I am very
interested in getting a copy. I should mention that I work for AT&T Canada
I am in the National Technical Support area and can be reached at ...!attcan!
dennis or here on my 6386 at home.
I have several CP/M systems lying around here and it would be great fun to
try and get UNIX running on at least one of them. I do not have any version
7 source.
Thanks in advance
--
==============================================================================
"A mind is a terrible thing to MAIL: Dennis S. Breckenridge
waste!" 206 Poyntz Ave
North York, Ontario M2N1J6
(416) 733-1696
UUCP: uunet!attcan!nebulus!dennis ICBM: 43 4 58 N / 87 55 52 W
50 megatons should do!
==============================================================================
------------------------------
Date: Monday, 26 September 1988 09:09-MDT
From: tektronix!orca!tekecs!frip!andrew@UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU (Andrew Klossner)
Subject: Z-80 Unix?
[]
"I have never in the meantime seen such a blatant example of
gratuitous incompatibility. What is surprising is that this
came from the man who cowrite _Elements of Programming Style_,
P.J. Plauger."
This discussion has overlooked the motivation of Unix incompatibility
in Idris. Plauger and associates were scared that AT&T lawyers would
shut them down under the trade secret laws because they had access to
Unix source code before they formed Whitesmiths. The "galloping
incompatibility" was an attempt to demonstrate that Idris was not a
Unix rip-off.
This was back in the days when the same company that sold Unix would
hassle you about adding an unregistered extension phone, and the
lowest-cost Unix license was $20,000 (no cheap binaries). I'd say
their concern was justified.
-=- Andrew Klossner (decvax!tektronix!tekecs!andrew) [UUCP]
(andrew%tekecs.tek.com@relay.cs.net) [ARPA]
------------------------------
Date: 30 Sep 88 03:13:28 GMT
From: cwjcc!hal!ncoast!mikes@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Phil Smith)
Subject: z-80 unix and unix-"like" shells
In article <7160@well.UUCP> bandy@well.UUCP (Andrew Scott Beals) writes:
>Let's clear things up. There are three general classes of
>objects that people are talking about:
>
> * Unix-like shells (CCP replacements)
> * Unix-like operating systems (ground-zero efforts)
> * Unix ported to the z80
>
I have in my hands one port of XINU (as in Doug Comer) to the Z80; that
was written in C/80 CP/M C. I have seen others. The XINU port that I
have is a bare-bones kernel (no utilities). It is a little odd to see
the results of ps -efl on an ADM-3a connected to an IMSAI, though.
The XINU port that I have was done by Ed Schramm, who lives near
Norfolk, VA. I can provide an address if needed.
Mike Squires Allegheny College Meadville, PA 16335 814 724 3360
uucp: ..!cwjcc!ncoast!{mikes,peng!sir-alan!mikes} or ..!pitt!sir-alan!mikes
BITNET: mikes%sir-alan@pitt.UUCP (VAX) MIKES AT SIR-ALAN!PITT.UUCP (IBM)
Internet: sir-alan!mikes@vax.cs.pittsburgh.edu
------------------------------
Date: Tuesday, 27 September 1988 23:33-MDT
From: spolsky-joel@yale-bulldog.arpa (Joel Spolsky)
Subject: z-80 unix and unix-"like" shells
In article <9464@cup.portal.com> Carra_its-me_Bussa@cup.portal.com writes:
| FYI, Cromix v11 _DOES_ run on a Z80.
|
| [happy description of Z80 unix deleted]
ah, time to start our discussions about porting Kermit to eniac, and
running Unix on an HP-41C again....
Joel
------------------------------
Date: 29 Sep 88 22:02:38 GMT
From: njsmu!mccc!pjh@princeton.edu (Pete Holsberg)
Subject: Z80MU
In article <8809241213.AA20544@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> GREID@FALCON.BERKELEY.EDU (GREID) writes:
...I am trying to run the CPM emulator Z80MU on a Zenith Z-180 Laptop and I am
...having trouble determining what is needed in the AUTOEXEC.Z80 file. The
...Z80MU.DOC file isn't much help. I would appreciate any suggestions concerning
...the appropriate contents of this file. Without it or with an "empty"
...AUTOEXEC.Z80 I get a BDOS error.
I run Z80MU without an AUTOEXEC.Z80 file. I believe that I ran it that
way when I had a Z-180. But, put DIR into it and see what happens. If
you still get the BDOS error, try another copy of Z80EMU or another Z-180.
Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Technology Division ...!att!jonlab!mccc!pjh
Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800
------------------------------
End of INFO-CPM Digest
******************************