home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Usenet 1994 October
/
usenetsourcesnewsgroupsinfomagicoctober1994disk1.iso
/
answers
/
sca-faq
/
part04
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1993-12-09
|
8KB
Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!pad-thai.aktis.com!pad-thai.aktis.com!not-for-mail
From: dennis_sherman@unc.edu
Newsgroups: rec.org.sca,rec.answers,news.answers
Subject: rec.org.sca / Rialto Frequently Asked Questions - part04/04
Supersedes: <sca-faq/part04_752701051@GZA.COM>
Followup-To: poster
Date: 8 Dec 1993 00:00:25 -0500
Organization: none
Lines: 132
Sender: faqserv@security.ov.com
Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
Expires: 21 Jan 1994 05:00:13 GMT
Message-ID: <sca-faq/part04_755326813@GZA.COM>
References: <sca-faq/part01_755326813@GZA.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pad-thai.aktis.com
Summary: FAQs with Answers for the Rialto - rec.org.sca and mailing
list sca@mc.lcs.mit.edu. The Society for Creative Anachronism is
an organization that studies the Middle Ages and Renaissance, and
recreates those parts we find most interesting.
X-Last-Updated: 1993/05/11
Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu rec.org.sca:55570 rec.answers:3294 news.answers:15599
Archive-name: sca-faq/part04
Last-modified: 05/11/1993
rec.org.sca and sca@mc.lcs.mit.edu FAQ
or
Questions Frequently Asked on the Rialto
----------------------------------------
This article is part 4 of the complete Frequently Asked Questions
posting for the Rialto. An introduction and table of contents are
included in part 1. The complete Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) list
is available via FTP from rtfm.mit.edu in directory
/pub/usenet/rec.org.sca. Those without FTP access should send e-mail to
mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu with "send usenet/news.answers/finding-sources"
in the body to find out how to do FTP by e-mail.
For more complete introductions to the SCA, see the recurring postings
"Come on in -- the water's fine" (by Hal Ravn [whheydt@pacbell.com] ) and
"Life in the Current Middle Ages." (by Arval Benicour
[mittle@watson.ibm.com] ).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guide to Posting Style
Each line of text posted to the Rialto is stored on thousands of Usenet
machines, and is also processed through the digestifier software and mailed
out to every recipient of the digest. Many of the readers of the Rialto
must pay for disk space and connect time. Keeping this in mind, here are
some common-sense guidelines for polite use of the Rialto. These are just
suggestions: there are no rules. However, following these guidelines would
be a courtesy to your fellow Rialtans, and to the good and generous
institutions whose machines support our communication.
Many of these suggestions are adapted from regular postings on
news.announce.newusers, notably "Rules for Posting to Usenet," "What is
Usenet?", "A Primer on How to Work with the Usenet," and "Hints on Writing
Style for Usenet." If you have access to that newsgroup, please take the
opportunity to read these postings.
* Keep it short. Say what you have to say, but in the fewest words
possible that make your meaning clear. Brevity that obscures
meaning is not very useful.
* Quote only what you must from previous articles.
- Don't quote someone's entire signature, or blank space.
- Don't include an entire article in order to append a single line of
text.
- Often a paraphrase will be clearer and more succinct than a quote.
* Use white space as necessary for clarity in your posting, and no more.
* Use a signature, but keep it short. People appreciate knowing who and
where you are (SCA and modern). Include your email address in your
signature, and enough of your name, titles, location etc. to ensure
an unambiguous identification. People do not appreciate paying
phone bills to transmit over-large signatures, and Usenet etiquette
frowns very strongly on many-line signatures or signatures with
graphics.
* Reply by mail, unless your message is going to be of general interest. Of
course, the Rialto is eclectic enough that a serious discussion of
almost any relevant topic will interest some people. Use your best
judgement to balance the level of general interest against the cost of
posting your message to the Rialto. Postings whose content amounts to
"you're an idiot" or "I demand you apologize for ..." are most
emphatically *NOT* welcome.
* If you have a problem reaching someone by e-mail contact your system
administrator, write to postmaster at your correspondent's node, or ask
someone on the net who seems to know a lot about e-mail. Please avoid
posting a message about it - you are trying to send something to
someone on ONE system. Posting sends it to all the thousands of
systems throughout the world that make up the Rialto - which is going
to cost someone, even if not you, a lot of money.
* Please don't post local event announcements. This is another "balance the
general interest value against the cost" issue. Local event
announcements probably will be of interest to only a small fraction of
the readership of the Rialto. A brief mention of an event in a
signature, or a 2 or 3 line summary with "email for more information"
is perfectly in order.
* Write carefully. People reading your postings can't hear your tone of
voice or see your expression, and probably don't know you well
enough to know whether you are serious or joking. Sarcasm is
guaranteed to be misunderstood by someone. It is better to avoid it
entirely, or at least clearly mark it with something like <SARCASM
ON> ...sarcasm... <SARCASM OFF>.
* LOTS of people read the Rialto, and the newsgroup is completely public.
Don't post anything you wouldn't want to say in a room filled with
complete strangers, your boss, your parent's relatives, reporters from
the National Enquirer, the peerage and royalty of your kingdom, etc.
They might well be reading. Take the time to re-read your posting, and
to think whether you *really* want to say that.
* Don't get offended, and don't offend others - most of the people
reading the Rialto are SCAdians, and would prefer being your friend
to the alternative. Treat people well and they will assuredly
respond in kind. If someone appears to be offended by a posting of
yours, especially if the offense is unintended, the best response is
to apologize via email. Also, note that "I'm sorry you took it that
way" is inadequate as an apology -- better is "I'm sorry I offended
you." The first implicitly shifts the blame to the offended person,
while the second does not.
* Use the subject line. If you can describe your topics in the subject
line of your posting, please do so. Posting with Subject: Various is
pretty pointless, isn't it? :-) If you are replying to a previous
posting, and you have shifted the topic, please correct the subject
line. Some people will make note of the previous subject like this:
Subject: Two-sword technique (Was Re: Pennsic)
---------- End of Rialto FAQ ----------
========================================================================
Thanks to all who have contributed to this article.
This article is a work in progress. If you have other topics you'd like to
see included, send me email with the question(s) and your suggested
answer(s). If you have comment on the items included, please send me
(polite) email.
PLEASE DO NOT COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE ON THE RIALTO! ! !
The whole point of this effort is to reduce traffic. I will summarize
comments sent to me, if it seems necessary.
--
Robyyan Torr d'Elandris Kapellenberg, Windmaster's Hill Atlantia
Dennis R. Sherman Triangle Research Libraries Network
dennis_sherman@unc.edu Univ. of North Carolina - Chapel Hill