home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Submitted-by: peterw@spaten.sharebase.com (Peter Wisnovsky)
-
- In article <166v0lINNpj8@ftp.UU.NET> mckee@imail.compaq.com (George McKee) writes:
- >Submitted-by: mckee@claude.se.hou.compaq.com (George McKee)
- >
- >Not to mention the reports that Microsoft NT will be POSIX compliant when
- >it appears.
-
- Not really in terms of character set support. My understanding is that
- they are going to fix wchar_t at 16 bits to store Unicode data, which
- strictly speaking is non-conformant. This raises the general issue
- of how Unix standards organizations are going to react to Unicode. It seems
- pretty clear that many major companies are moving in the direction of
- Unicode. However, the absence of AT&T from the last Unicode implementors
- workshop bodes ill for inclusion of Unicode in SVR5 anytime soon.
-
- Unfortunately there seems to be no satisfactory way to imbed Unicode
- within the EUC framework used in AT&T's MNLS system, which I understand
- is their implementation of Posix international language support.
-
- I'd love to hear differently, since I envision having to support Unicode
- some day, but am loath to do it without substantial support from the OS.
-
- Peter Wisnovsky
- --
-
- UUNET: peterw@sharebase.com
- US Mail: ShareBase Corporation - 1919 Addison Ave. - Berkeley, CA 94704
- Phone: (510) 548-3211
-
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 28, Number 90
-
-