home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Submitted-by: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
-
- >Submitted-by: jason@cnd.hp.com (Jason Zions)
- >>Do you truly believe that a hundred people who've never tested their
- >>``informed opinions'' on the market can get together, sit around a
- >>table, and ballot their way to the Holy Grail?
- >
- >I'm getting really tired of this baseless accusation. Come to a meeting; ask
- >the people there, who are employed by vendors, if they implement the stuff
- >they're standardizing. The numbers will surprise *you*; they'll surprise
- >almost no one else.
-
- They may not surprise him if he asks the right questions. Like, for
- example, "how many people here have implemented 1003.2 regular expressions
- from scratch straight from the spec?". Based on the number of problems I
- found in the spec when I did the syntactic part of this a couple of months
- ago, I am quite certain that none of the people involved had ever tried it.
- I found, and reported, half a dozen serious problems in a spec that was
- supposed to be very near its final state. And this, mind you, was in
- a fairly well-understood area with a lot of existing practice to draw on.
-
- This accusation, I'm afraid, is *not* baseless. Those people are not
- implementing the stuff they are standardizing; they are implementing their
- own interpretation of the important parts of what they think it says.
- They are in for a very nasty shock when their customers start reading
- the fine print and demanding that they comply with it. Hell, *I* thought
- the 1003.2 regexp stuff was fine -- I wrote some of it! -- until I tried
- implementing it solely from the draft standard.
- --
- SVR4: the first system so open that | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- everyone dumps their garbage there. | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 26, Number 14
-
-