home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Submitted-by: andrew@alice.att.com (Andrew Hume)
-
- While casually reading ISO 9660, I happened across the file permissions
- field for a file. This is some twisted person's idea of a joke but probably
- is the VMS permissions field. What was not specified was what happens
- if two different bits conflict (more on what i mean exactly below).
- ``Ha!!'', I said, ``1003.1 would have gotten that right!''
- Unfortunately, I couldn't find the explanation in 1003.1. Can someone help
- me out here?
- The problem, phrased in 1003.1's terms, is what happens if i am both
- the owner and group of a file with mode 040; can I read it?
- There are actually two problems. One is that 1003.1 defines
- bits and mentions words like read permission and masks but never actually says
- what the meaning of S_IRUSR (for example) is when it is set (or not).
- But let us pass over that and assume the wording should have been something
- like:
- If S_IRUSR is set, then the user whose ID == st_uid may read the file.
- If S_IRUSR is not set, then the user whose ID == st_uid may not read
- the file.
- The second problem then arises; in this scenario, one clause says I may read
- and the other says I may not read. How do I break this conflict? Of course, in
- Unix (which after all is only distantly related to 1003.1), the access bits are
- interpreted or enforced as
- 1) if i am the owner, then the owner permissions apply.
- 2) otherwise, if i match the group, then the group permissions apply.
- 3) Otherwise, the other permissions apply.
- But I couldn't find words to that effect in 1003.1.
-
- Where should I be looking?
-
- andrew hume
- andrew@research.att.com
-
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 23, Number 81
-
-