home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Submitted-by: domo@tsa.co.uk (Dominic Dunlop)
-
- In article <107020@uunet.UU.NET> donn@hpfcrn.fc.hp.com (Donn Terry) writes
- cogently about file system and other name spaces. I'm not going to add
- significantly to what he said, merely embroider a little:
-
- > One of the class of objects named in the namespace is ordinary files.
- > The set of ordinary files is a collection of flat namespaces, where
- > the names are (binary) numbers. (Each mounted volume is an element
- > of the collection, and each i-number is a filename. The "real names"
- > of files are the volume and i-number pair; that's how you tell if two
- > files are identical, not by their names in the namespace, of which
- > they may have zero or more.) (The fact that the other object types
- > also usually have i-numbers is an accident of implementation.)
-
- I'd just like to add that the existing POSIX.1 standard does incorporate
- the concept of ``a per-file system unique identifier for a file'',
- although its ethnic origins have been disguised by calling it a ``file
- serial number'' rather than an i-number. The corresponding field in the
- stat structure is, by no coincidence at all, st_ino.
-
- Donn's point about the need to be able to determine whether two
- ``handles'' (whatever they may be) refer to the same object is a good
- one. It follows that, if new types of object are made accessible
- through filename space, the information returned by stat() (or fstat())
- should be sufficient uniquely to identify each distinct object. Of
- course, where the object is not a conventional file, life becomes more
- complex than simply saying that each unique serial number/device id
- combination refers to a unique object. Although POSIX.1 is
- reticent on the topic because it is studiously avoiding the UNIX-ism of
- major and minor device numbers, we all know that, faced with a device
- file on a UN*X system, we should ignore the serial number, and use only
- the device id in determining uniqueness.
-
- I dare say that, as more types of object appear in filename space (and
- I, for one, should like to see them do so), the question of determining
- uniqueness will become knottier. Suppose, for example, that one used
- filenames as handles for virtual circuits across a wide-area network.
- Conceivably, the number of such circuits could be sufficiently large
- that it will become difficult o shoe-horn a unique identifier into the
- existing stat structure fields. A problem for the future?
-
- --
- Dominic Dunlop
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 172
-
-