home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
-
- >From: khb@Eng.Sun.COM (Keith Bierman - SPD Advanced Languages)
- > ...The key reason is that there have actually been cases
- > where someone gets it, modifies it slightly for their own benefit, and
- > then prints it claiming it's the standard. ...
- >
- >Sounds like an excuse, not a reason. It would not be hard to publish
- >checksums.
-
- But how do you convince people to run checksums on the documents and compare?
- Remember, the customers *will not* read the documentation even when it is
- clearly in their interests to do so -- and you want them to run checksums?
- (Setting aside the problem that there is no standard checksum program...)
- The only way this will work is if it is sufficiently automatic that whenever
- they display the document on their screens, a big red flashing label saying
- "FRAUDULENTLY ALTERED" appears underneath. Unfortunately, short of advanced
- cryptographic techniques, there's no way to make this work.
-
- This is not to deny that financial motives play a part. But prevention of
- fraud is a real and legitimate concern with no trivial solution.
-
- Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
- henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 59
-
-