home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: willcox@urbana.mcd.mot.com (David A Willcox)
-
- I'm not sure how these responses got into the newsgroup. I intended
- to send my original response directly to the guy who asked for a list
- of utilities. I didn't think I was posting it to the world. Ah, well.
-
- [ See my followup about this. -mod ]
-
- In article <11187@cs.utexas.edu> mwette@csi.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Matt Wette) writes:
-
- >I didn't see "ld" in your posting Did you forget it or is there really
- >no POSIX spec for "ld". If there is, I would be interested to know if
- >"ld -A" (loading to an executing program) will be in the spec.
-
- No, there is no "ld" in POSIX.2. You link a bunch of objects using
- "c89 [-o file] a.o b.o ...".
-
- The details of a raw "ld" were considered too implementation-specific
- for a standard.
-
- David
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 37
-
-