Usenet 1994 January/usenetsourcesnewsgroupsinfomagicjanuary1994.iso/sources/std_unix/v21/122.a.diff

Text File | 1990-12-05 | 4KB | 101 lines

336 vn/122 vn/122.a
1c1
< From [e-mail]  Thu Sep 20 20:01:54 1990
---
> From [e-mail]  Fri Sep 21 13:19:38 1990
3,4c3,4
<     id AA24776; Thu, 20 Sep 90 20:01:54 -0400
< Posted-Date: 20 Sep 90 23:09:13 GMT
---
>     id AA15461; Fri, 21 Sep 90 13:19:38 -0400
> Posted-Date: 21 Sep 90 13:47:37 GMT
6,13c6,16
< From: [e-mail] (cornelius.hill)
< Newsgroups: misc.forsale,na.forsale,ba.market.housing,su.market
< Subject: FOR SALE: PART OWNERSHIP IN CALIFORNIA RESORT
< Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
< Followup-To: poster
< Organization: Motorola CSD, Cupertino CA
< Date: 20 Sep 90 23:09:13 GMT
< Apparently-To: [e-mail]
---
> From: [e-mail] (David A Willcox)
> Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
> Subject: Re: Standards Update, IEEE 1003.2: Shell and tools
> Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
> References: <[e-mail]>
> Sender: [e-mail]
> Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Urbana, IL
> X-Submissions: [e-mail]
> Date: 21 Sep 90 13:47:37 GMT
> Reply-To: [e-mail]
> To: [e-mail]
14a18
> Submitted-by: [e-mail] (David A Willcox)
16,24c20
<    FOR SALE
<    ========
<
<    Part ownership in a Ranch Resort near the town of Redding, located
<    in northern California.
<
<    This is not a Time-Share; once you are an owner you can visit 365 days
<    a year for as long as you wish to stay. There are camper and trailer
<    hookups as well as areas for tents.
---
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jeffrey S. Haemer) writes:
26,32c22
<    What you get with this is 250 cabins, 2 swimming pools, 2 hot tubs,
<    a 42 room hotel, 100+ horses, dance hall, club house, restaurant,
<    tennis courts, volleyball courts, Gun range (pistol, Rifle and Archery),
<    2 sites for tents, 2 sites for campers, hiking trails, trails for 4WD
<    and other off road vehicles, 3 lakes for fishing, and much more. You are
<    near Lake Shasta, but not too near. There is Cross Country Skiing as
<    well as Hill Skiing each year.
---
> >A few utilities remain contentious:
34,39c24,26
<    The Ranch is a place to get away from the working world and enjoy
<    life all over again. I am leaving CA. and wish to sell my interest in
<    this Ranch I do not plan on coming back. The asking price is $140,000,
<    but I am willing to hear all who are interested. You can call me at
<    [phone] (home), [phone]/4108 (work) or you can
<    send me an e-mail.
---
> >   + nice, renice: These require underlying functionality absent from
> >     POSIX.1, although POSIX.4 has setscheduler(), which allows
> >     applications to set priority and scheduling algorithms.
41c28,32
<    Thanks...
---
> A point of clarification:  These utilities, as defined in 1003.2a,
> do NOT require any functionality that is not in 1003.1.  Both can be
> implemented on a bare-bones 1003.1 system as having no effect on
> execution priority.  The following, for example, is a valid
> shell script implementation of nice:
43c34,55
<    - Cornelius Hill
---
>     case $1 in
>         -n) shift;shift;;
>         -*  shift;;
>     esac
>     exec $*
>
> renice is a little more complicated, but not much.  (It should just have
> to check for valid arguments.)
>
> So saying that you can't implement this on a 1003.1 system is not only
> a red herring, it simply isn't true.
>
> Providing these utilities allows well-mannered applications to make use
> of the priority manipluation features that are already provided by most
> implementations.
>
> David A. Willcox        "Just say 'NO' to universal drug testing"
> Motorola MCD - Urbana        UUCP: ...!uiucuxc!udc!willcox
> 1101 E. University Ave.        INET: [e-mail]
> Urbana, IL 61801        FONE: 217-384-8534
>
> Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 122