home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Usenet 1994 January
/
usenetsourcesnewsgroupsinfomagicjanuary1994.iso
/
sources
/
std_unix
/
v21
/
007
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1990-12-05
|
2KB
From uucp@tic.com Sat Aug 4 18:25:45 1990
Received: from cs.utexas.edu by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with SMTP
id AA10406; Sat, 4 Aug 90 18:25:45 -0400
Posted-Date: 3 Aug 90 15:01:44 GMT
Received: by cs.utexas.edu (5.64/1.68)
id AA11021; Sat, 4 Aug 90 17:25:43 -0500
Received: by longway.tic.com (4.22/tic.1.2)
id AA01793; Sat, 4 Aug 90 15:09:54 cdt
From: Ron Heiby <heiby@mcdchg.chg.mcd.mot.com>
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: is struct utimbuf in the standard sys/types.h?
Message-Id: <424@usenix.ORG>
References: <405@usenix.ORG> <415@usenix.ORG>
Sender: std-unix@usenix.ORG
Reply-To: std-unix@uunet.uu.net
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer, Schaumburg, IL
Date: 3 Aug 90 15:01:44 GMT
Apparently-To: std-unix-archive@uunet.uu.net
From: heiby@mcdchg.chg.mcd.mot.com (Ron Heiby)
I apologize for some inaccuracy in my previous article. As I've not
yet managed to get my boss to get a copy of 1003.1 for the office,
I was relying on my Release 1.1 Binary Compatibility Standard from
the 88open Consortium Ltd. That document shows the microsecond
elements included in the structure. According to another posting
in this group, it seems that adding such items, although of questionable
desirability, is allowed and not mandated by 1003.1 and is no longer
allowed in the 1990 revision. I wonder what happens to the 88open
BCS, when it is no longer compliant with 1003? BTW, I also happened
to check my SVID, Issue 2, Volume 1, page 144. It says that utimbuf
must have just the two time_t values.
--
Ron Heiby, heiby@chg.mcd.mot.com Moderator: comp.newprod
"Mandatory Drug Testing? Just Say NO!!!"
Volume-Number: Volume 21, Number 7