home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- As far as I am aware, the details of the UUCP protocol are not
- considered a trade secret by AT&T, although the UNIX software
- that implements that protocol certainly is. I think it's more
- a matter of nobody taking the time to write it down.
-
- I saw a detailed description of the UUCP protocol go by on the
- comp.mail.uucp newsgroup the other day. It appeared to be
- deduced from "black box" treatment, except that the "g" protocol
- document was written by its author: Greg Chesson. (I don't know
- the release status of that document, only that it seems to be
- generally available, since it was posted to Usenet by someone who
- is not associated with AT&T.)
-
- In any case, the protocol evidently IS documented, and this documentation
- is generally available. If there is interest in standardizing UUCP,
- I doubt AT&T will object, and their representatives on the POSIX
- committee will have every opportunity to do so if I'm wrong.
-
- Personally, I feel that UUCP ought to be standardized, but not as
- part of the base system, but as an optional extension. I think that
- market demands will be sufficient to require most vendors to support
- it, but they will be unable to without an appropriate standard unless
- they use AT&T derived code. We may feel that UUCP will be dead in a
- few years, but I seem to recall that Mike Lesk described UUCP as a
- quick kludge to get us by until we all had real networks (and he said this
- in 1978.)
-
- Mark
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 9, Number 44
-
-