home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: harvard!encore!vaxine!nw (Neil Webber)
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 86 09:52:37 est
-
- > From: gwyn@brl.arpa (VLD/VMB)
- > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 86 9:44:19 EDT
- >
- > If it doesn't support 32-character extern name uniqueness, it isn't POSIX.
- > 1003.1 imposes requirements on a C implementation beyond those of X3J11.
- >
- While I'm 100% behind this idea, I have to ask the question "how did this
- come to be?" As I recall, the major argument against providing longer
- extern names in X3J11 was that it would preclude X3J11 conforming C
- implementations on systems with restricted object file formats. Is it
- now impossible to provide a POSIX conforming implementation on those
- systems?
-
- This is only a problem for implementations layered on top of an existing
- OS. Being somewhat of a "young one", I haven't worked on any systems
- with a 6-character extern limit. (Life is tough, isn't it?) However, I'd
- be interested in knowing what systems suffer from this restriction, and
- why it doesn't matter that a POSIX environment can't be provided under
- those systems.
-
- Neil Webber Automatix Inc. Billerica MA
- {decvax,ihnp4,allegra}!encore!vaxine!nw
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 8, Number 3
-
-