Usenet 1994 January/usenetsourcesnewsgroupsinfomagicjanuary1994.iso/sources/std_unix/mod.std.unix.v7/text0053.txt

Internet Message Format | 1987-06-30 | 54.1 KB

From: hplabs!hpda!hpisoa1!davel (Dave Lennert)
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 86 22:33:31 -0800

As an addendum to the P1003 job control proposal text I submitted,
here's a paper describing the 4.2 job control implementation, the
System V incompatibilities, and how they were resolved.  This was
the background investigation that went into the P1003 proposal.

This is the same paper that appears in the Atlanta USENIX proceedings.
[ June 1986, pp. 459-474.  -mod ]
It uses the -ms macro package.

    Dave Lennert                ucbvax!hpda!davel               [UUCP]
    Hewlett-Packard - 47UX      ihnp4!hplabs!hpda!davel         [UUCP]
    19447 Pruneridge Ave.       hpda![e-mail]         [ARPA]
    Cupertino, CA  95014        [phone]                  [AT&T]


# This is a shell archive.  Remove anything before this line,
# then unpack it by saving it in a file and typing "sh file".
#
# Wrapped by davel on Thu Oct  9 22:29:34 PDT 1986
# Contents:  jobpaper.ms

echo x - jobpaper.ms
sed 's/^@//' > "jobpaper.ms" <<'@//E*O*F jobpaper.ms//'
@.de PB
@.sp 1
@.RS
@.nf
@..
@.de PE
@.fi
@.RE
@.sp 1
@..
@.DA
@.    \" Put page numbers at bottom center rather than top center
@.rm CH
@.ds CF - \\n(PN -
@.    \" UX - UNIX macro
@.de UX
@.ie \\n(UX \s-1UNIX\s0\\$1
@.el \{\
\s-1UNIX\s0\\$1\(dg
@.FS
\(dg \s-1UNIX\s0 is a trademark of AT&T.
@.FE
@.nr UX 1
@.\}
@..
@.TL
A System V Compatible Implementation of 4.2BSD Job Control
@.AU
David C. Lennert
@.AI
Hewlett-Packard Company
Information Technology Group
hplabs\^!\^hpda\^!\^davel
@.AB
This paper gives an overview of how process groups and controlling
terminals are handled in System V and 4.2BSD and then
discusses the effect 4.2BSD job control has on these things.
A modified 4.2BSD interface is discussed which supports 4.2BSD job control
functionality but in a way which allows AT&T System V compatibility.
This interface has been implemented in Hewlett-Packard's
@.UX
system, HP-UX.
@.AE
@.sp 1
@.NH
INTRODUCTION
@.PP
The job control functionality first introduced into
@.UX
by Jim Kulp of IIASA and later provided by 4.2BSD
@.UX
has become a \fIde facto\fP industry standard.
However, this job control facility, as implemented in 4.2BSD, is incompatible
in several respects with System V.
@.PP
Recently a proposal was submitted to the IEEE P1003 Portable Operating
System standard committee by Sun Microsystems [Harris86] which attempts
to define
4.2BSD job control functionality in a way compatible with System V.
Hewlett-Packard Company has been independently developing a similar
proposal.  HP's proposal is almost identical to Sun's but goes
beyond it to address many "corner case" areas which strongly affect
System V compatibility.
@.PP
This paper gives an overview of the relevant areas of System V
functionality which are affected.  It then overviews how job control
is implemented in 4.2BSD and how this impacts the System V interface.
Finally, the HP-UX interface is presented and a similar overview of its
implementation is given.
@.PP
The various overviews cover how job control signals are generated, passed,
and acknowledged by the tty driver and user processes.  They also explain
how process groups are established and changed.
@.sp 1
@.NH
FUNDAMENTALS
@.PP
In the following discussion the reader is assumed to have an understanding
of several fundamental concepts found in the
@.UX
operating system.  For convenience these concepts are briefly reviewed here.
@.NH 2
Process Groups and Controlling Terminals
@.PP
Every process has a unique numeric value associated with it called
its \fIprocess ID\fP.  Every process also has a non-unique numeric value
associated with it called its \fIprocess group ID\fP.
A \fIprocess group\fP is a collection of processes having identical numeric
process group ID's.  Typically, one process in the process group will
be the \fIprocess group leader\fP.  The process group leader has a process ID
which is numerically equal to the process group ID associated with all processes
in the process group.  Typically, the process group leader is the ancestor
of all other processes in the process group.
@.PP
A process can have a \fIcontrolling terminal\fP which is usually the login
terminal of the user who created the process.  A process can obtain access
to its controlling terminal by opening the file \fI/dev/tty\fP.
All processes in the same process group typically share the same controlling
terminal.  A terminal usually has a process group ID associated with it,
called the \fItty group ID\fP.  When a user generates a keyboard signal
(e.g., by typing the interrupt character), the tty driver sends the appropriate
signal to all processes which are members of the process group indicated by
the tty group ID.
In summary,
usually, but not necessarily, all processes in the same process group share
the same controlling terminal, and the tty group ID for that terminal is
equal to the process group ID of the process group.
@.PP
For further explanation see [Roch85] and intro(2) in your favorite
@.UX
Programmer's Manual.
@.NH 2
4.2BSD Job Control
@.PP
4.2BSD job control allows users to selectively stop (suspend) the
execution of processes and continue (resume) their execution at any
later point.  This only easily works for processes which are stopped
and continued during the same login session.
@.PP
The user almost always employs this facility via the interactive interface
jointly supplied by the system tty driver and a job control shell such as
csh(1) or ksh(1).
The tty driver recognizes a user-defined
\fIsuspend character\fP which causes all current foreground processes to
stop and the user's job control shell to resume.
The job control shell provides commands which continue stopped processes
in either the foreground or background.
The tty driver will also stop a background process when it attempts to
read from or write to the users terminal.  This allows the user to finish
or suspend their foreground task without interruption and continue the
stopped background process at a more convenient time.
@.PP
To enable the system to support this,
4.2BSD job control introduces five new signals: SIGSTOP, SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN,
SIGTTOU, and SIGCONT.  The first four signals cause a process to stop unless
the signals are being caught or ignored.  SIGCONT always causes a stopped
process to continue.  (SIGCONT has no effect on processes which are not
stopped.)  SIGSTOP cannot be caught or ignored.
@.PP
The tty driver sends some of these signals to all processes in the tty
process group under the following conditions:  The driver sends SIGTSTP when
the user types the suspend or delayed suspend character.  The driver sends
SIGTTIN (SIGTTOU) when a background process attempts to read from (write to)
its controlling terminal.
SIGCONT is usually only sent by a job control shell when
the user requests that a stopped process be continued.
Of course, any signal can be sent by a user via the kill(1) command or
by a program via the kill(2) system call.
@.PP
It should be noted that these signals can be added to a
@.UX
implementation in a manner which preserves source and object code
compatibility.  A process is not required to be aware of them.  By
default the signals do "the right thing."
@.PP
For further information see [Joy80] and [UCB83].
@.sp 1
@.NH
AT&T SYSTEM V
@.NH 2
Introduction
@.PP
System V process groups closely resemble the concept of a login session.
That is, all processes spawned during the same login session tend to
belong to the same process group, and keyboard signals are typically
sent to all processes spawned from the login session.
@.NH 2
System V Process Group Handling
@.PP
In System V, the only way to alter the process group associated
with a process (p_pgrp) is via setpgrp(2).  And this can only set the process
group to equal the process ID (pid) of the process.  When this happens
the resulting process with pid = p_pgrp is called a process group leader.
Since a process's pid can never change,
once a process issues a setpgrp(2) call it irrevocably becomes
a process group leader.
@.PP
The init(1M) process spawns all other processes on the system either
directly or indirectly.  Before directly spawning a process
(after the fork(2) but before the exec(2)),
init calls setpgrp(2).
Thus all original children (not orphans) of init are forced to (irrevocably)
be process group leaders.
@.PP
When a new process is created, it is assigned a new pid but it inherits
the process group number of its parent.  Thus child processes are, by
default, not process group leaders (although they can become a process
group leader via setpgrp(2)).
@.PP
When a process group leader which has a controlling terminal (see below)
terminates, SIGHUP is sent to all processes in the same
process group.
@.PP
Further, when a process group leader terminates, all processes that
belong to this process group are altered to belong to no process group
(their p_pgrp is set to zero).
More precisely, when any process exits, all processes whose process
group (p_pgrp) equals the pid of the terminating process will have their
p_pgrp set to zero; this check succeeds only in the case of a
terminating process group leader.
@.NH 2
System V Controlling Terminals
@.PP
A terminal that is currently open by a process may also be a "controlling
terminal" for a process group.  When certain
control characters are typed on a controlling terminal, signals are
sent by the terminal driver to all processes that belong to the process
group associated with the terminal.
@.PP
When a process becomes a process group leader (via setpgrp(2)) it
automatically loses its controlling terminal.  After this,
the first terminal (that is not already a controlling terminal)
opened by the process
is assigned to be the controlling terminal for that process.
Also, the process group associated with that terminal (t_pgrp, also known
as the tty group ID) is set
equal to the process group associated with the process group leader
(p_pgrp).
All child processes inherit the controlling terminal and
process group of their parent.
@.PP
More precisely, in System V, the process group associated with a
terminal (t_pgrp), can be changed in the following ways:
@.IP (1)
When a terminal is opened by a process group leader (pid == p_pgrp)
that does not already have a controlling terminal,
it becomes the controlling terminal for that process group
(t_pgrp is set equal to p_pgrp) if it is not already a controlling
terminal.
@.IP (2)
When a process group leader (pid == p_pgrp) dies, if it has a
controlling terminal that is associated with the same process
group (t_pgrp == p_pgrp), then that terminal is disassociated from that
process group (t_pgrp is set to zero).
@.IP (3)
When the last process to have a terminal open closes that terminal,
the terminal is disassociated from its process group (t_pgrp
is set to zero).
@.NH 2
System V Typical Scenario
@.PP
This is a typical scenario for the birth and death of a process group and
its controlling terminal.
@.PP
The init(1M) process wants to enable a terminal for login.  It calls fork(2)
to create a new process and then calls
setpgrp(2) to make the process a process
group leader which also removes the process's controlling terminal.  It
then runs the getty(1M) program as the process via exec(2).
Getty opens the terminal causing it to become getty's controlling terminal
and be associated with getty's process group (t_pgrp is set to p_pgrp).
Getty replaces itself with login(1) which replaces itself with a login
shell, e.g., sh(1).
Usually no program calls setpgrp(2) and thus all descendent processes
of the login shell are in the same process group and have the same
controlling terminal; keyboard signals are sent to all processes launched
during this session.
@.PP
When a logout occurs, the login shell (which is the process group leader)
dies and the controlling terminal is freed up (t_pgrp is set to zero) so
that it can be claimed as a controlling terminal by a subsequent getty
respawned by init.
SIGHUP is sent to all processes in the same process group.
The process group (p_pgrp) of all descendent processes is then set to zero.
@.PP
Note that there may continue to be background processes (previously
started by the
now defunct login shell) which continue to execute but
keyboard signals will no longer be sent to these processes (since
both t_pgrp and p_pgrp equal zero).
@.sp 1
@.NH
4.2BSD
@.NH 2
Introduction
@.PP
4.2BSD process groups closely resemble the concept of a task within
a login session, where a task represents a set of processes which
are affected as a group by job control operations.
Every time a job control shell (e.g., csh) spawns either a foreground
or background command, all processes in the pipeline (and their
descendents) are placed in their own unique process group with the
first command in the pipeline being the process group leader.
@.PP
A task is in the foreground when the process group associated with the
controlling terminal for the task (t_pgrp) is equal to the process
group associated with the processes in the task (p_pgrp).
Otherwise the task is in the background.
A job control shell moves a job between the foreground and background
by adjusting the terminal process group (t_pgrp) of the controlling
terminal.
@.PP
Note that 4.2BSD forms new process groups with process group leaders
much more often than System V usually does (every command versus
every login).
@.NH 2
4.2BSD Process Group Handling
@.PP
In 4.2BSD, the process group associated with a process (p_pgrp)
can be altered in two ways.  The first is via setpgrp(2).  4.2BSD's setpgrp(2)
is analogous to System V's setpgrp(2) except that the former can affect
processes other than the current process and can cause the affected
process to adopt a process group other than that process's process ID (pid).
Thus, unlike System V, a process can cease to be a process group leader.
@.PP
In addition to setpgrp(2), a process that is not a member of any
process group (p_pgrp == 0) will "inherit" or join the process
group associated with its controlling terminal at the time the
process is assigned a controlling terminal during open(2).
If the terminal being opened is not presently the controlling
terminal for any process group, then the process opening the
terminal will first be made a process group leader (p_pgrp will
be set to p_pid) and then the terminal will become the controlling
terminal for this new process group.  All this is done by the
tty open code.
@.PP
When a new process is created it inherits the process group of its parent.
@.PP
Unlike System V init(1M), 4.2BSD init(8) does not call setpgrp(2) when spawning
other processes.  All processes spawned by init inherit init's process
group which happens to be zero ("not a member of any process group").
This is actually crucial for assigning controlling terminals; see below.
@.NH 2
4.2BSD Controlling Terminals
@.PP
Unlike System V, a 4.2BSD process does not lose its controlling terminal
when altering its process group (via setpgrp(2)).
Also unlike System V, a 4.2BSD process that is a process group leader
(pid == p_pgrp) but which has no controlling terminal does not receive
a controlling terminal when opening a new terminal.
@.PP
A process can obtain a controlling terminal under 4.2BSD in only the
following ways:
@.IP (1)
A process can inherit a controlling terminal from its parent.
@.IP (2)
A process that is not a member of any process group (p_pgrp == 0)
can open any terminal and that terminal will become its controlling
terminal (whether or not it is already the controlling terminal for another
process).
However, this can happen in one of two ways:
@.IP
If the terminal is not already a controlling terminal (t_pgrp == 0)
then the opening process becomes a process group leader (its p_pgrp is set
equal to its pid) and the terminal becomes its controlling terminal
(t_pgrp is set to the new p_pgrp value).
@.IP
If the terminal is already a controlling terminal for another process
(t_pgrp is not zero) then the opening process joins the process group
already associated with the controlling terminal.  That is, p_pgrp is
set equal to the current t_pgrp.  Note that the opening process does
not become a process group leader, i.e., p_pgrp is not equal to its pid.
@.IP
Note that this procedure only happens during the first terminal open
for a process that was either originally spawned by init or whose
ancestor processes (all the way back to init) never altered their
process group (p_pgrp) either by opening a terminal or calling setpgrp(2).
@.PP
A terminal ceases to be a controlling terminal (t_pgrp is set to zero) under
4.2BSD in the following way:
@.IP (1)
When the last process to have a terminal open closes that terminal
then the terminal is disassociated from its process group (t_pgrp
is set to zero).
@.PP
There are two other facilities unique to 4.2BSD which affect access to
control terminals: the TIOCSPGRP ioctl(2) and vhangup(2).
@.PP
The TIOCSPGRP ioctl(2) function changes a terminal's process group (t_pgrp)
to any desired value.
It is typically used by csh(1) to control which set of processes (process
group) is in the foreground.
@.PP
The vhangup(2) function is invoked by init after
forking but before exec'ing getty.  This function removes read and
write permission for all processes (including the caller)
that have the controlling terminal
open (whether or not it is their controlling terminal).  It then sends
SIGHUP to the process group associated with the terminal (t_pgrp).
The latter action is similar to the System V functionality that sends
SIGHUP to a process group on death of the process group leader; 4.2BSD
does not do this on the death of a process group leader.
@.NH 2
4.2BSD Typical Scenario
@.PP
This is a typical scenario for the birth and death of a login, its
controlling terminal, and process groups associated with a job.
@.PP
The init(8) process wants to enable a terminal for login.
First it creates a new process via fork(2).
Then it opens the terminal which
(because the p_pgrp inherited from init is zero)
causes it to become the controlling
terminal for this process and either alters the process group (p_pgrp) of
the process to match the terminal process group (t_pgrp) if non-zero, or
alters both p_pgrp and t_pgrp to equal the process ID (pid) if t_pgrp is zero.
At this point the new process has a controlling terminal whose process group
(t_pgrp) is equal to the process's process group (p_pgrp).  However, the
process may not be a process group leader (i.e., p_pgrp may not equal pid).
@.PP
Now the new process calls vhangup(2) to remove
access permissions for the controlling terminal from all processes (as well
as sending SIGHUP to any processes in the process group previously
associated with the terminal).
The new process then reopens the terminal to get a file descriptor with
read and
write permissions since the vhangup(2) removed these permission from the
file descriptor returned by the previous open.
The previous file descriptor is not closed until now to prevent losing
the controlling terminal; (remember that p_pgrp for the new process is
no longer zero.)
@.PP
The new process now replaces itself with getty(8) which replaces itself
with login(1) which replaces itself with a login shell, e.g., csh(1).
Csh now begins to manipulate the process group associated with the
terminal (t_pgrp) via the TIOCSPGRP and TIOCGPGRP ioctl(2) calls and
the process group associated with its child processes (p_pgrp) via
setpgrp(2) in order to allow job control.  This happens (briefly) in the
following way:
@.PP
Csh launches a pipeline by making all programs in the pipeline be
immediate descendents of csh.  (This is different from sh which makes
all programs in the pipeline except the last be descendents of the
last program in the pipeline.)
All programs in the pipeline belong to the same process group (not the
same as csh's process group) and the first program in the pipeline is
the process group leader (its pid is equal to the process group for the
pipeline).
If the pipeline is being launched in the foreground (or moved to the
foreground) then the process group associated with the terminal (t_pgrp)
is set to the process group of the pipeline.
@.PP
When a logout occurs, the login shell dies.
Any pending SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU, and SIGTSTP signals are cleared for all
descendent processes.
All immediate child processes are inherited as orphans by init; if any are
currently stopped then they are killed (SIGKILL).
If the exiting process is the last process that has the controlling
terminal open then the terminal's process group (t_pgrp) is set to zero,
otherwise it is left alone.
Nothing special is done for process group leaders; in fact, login shells
are frequently not process group leaders.  (SIGHUP is not sent and the
controlling terminal is not necessarily cleared.)
@.PP
Note that there may continue to be processes (previously
started by the now defunct login shell) which continue to execute.
And that keyboard signals can still be sent to these processes under some
circumstances (specifically when the processes were in the foreground
(p_pgrp == t_pgrp) when the login shell died; this usually only happens
when the login shell is killed from another terminal via kill(1).)
Note also that this continues to be true even after a new session logs in
on the same terminal since the new login shell joins the process group
which is already associated with the terminal from the prior login.
@.NH 2
Job Control Signal Handling
@.PP
The following discussions concerning signals and kernel process
synchronization are similar to ones found in [Thom78], [Ritch79],
and [Bach79].
@.NH 3
Basic Overview
@.PP
Usually a process is either running or sleeping waiting for an event to
occur (e.g., I/O completion).  When a signal is sent to a process (either
by another process or an I/O driver) what actually occurs is that a flag
is set for the receiving (or target) process indicating that the signal
has been sent and the target process performs the actual signal operation
to itself the next time it runs.  Thus sending a signal amounts to
requesting the target process to itself perform a particular action.
If the target process is already running it is interrupted to process
the signal.  If it is runnable but not currently running then the
system merely waits for it to become the currently running process at
which point the signal is acknowledged.  If the target process
is sleeping then either
it is moved into a runnable state (if it is sleeping at an "interruptable"
priority) or it is left sleeping (at an "uninterruptable" priority) and
the signal is not acknowledged until the slept on event occurs.
@.PP
The kernel procedure which sends a signal is psignal() and is executed
by the sending process or driver.
Psignal() updates a list of pending signals for the receiving process.
If the receiving process is the currently running process and it is
executing in kernel mode then the pending signal is acknowledged
when the current system call completes.
(This is the case where the sending process and the receiving process
are the same.)
If the receiving process is the currently running process and it is
executing in user mode then a special event is generated
which causes the process to
enter the kernel and acknowledge the pending signal.
(This is the case where the sending "process" is really an interrupt
handler which, for example, is servicing an interrupt character
typed on a user's terminal.)
If the receiving process is
sleeping but not holding off signals then it is set running via wakeup();
the pending signal is acknowledged as soon as the receiving process executes.
If the receiving process is suspended in a sleep state that holds off
signals ("sleeping uninterruptably") then it is left sleeping;
the pending signal will be acknowledged after the waited for event occurs.
@.PP
The procedure which tests for a pending signal is issig() and is executed
by the receiving process.
Issig() is executed whenever the receiving process changes from kernel
mode to user mode execution; for example, at the completion of a system call.
It is also executed whenever the receiving process is awakened from
being suspended in a sleep state that does not hold off signals ("sleeping
interruptably").
@.PP
The procedure which performs the requested signal operation (e.g.,
invoking a signal handler or killing the process) is psig() and is
executed by the receiving process if issig() returns true.
@.PP
This basic structure is essentially the same in System V, 4.2BSD, and
HP-UX.  However, under 4.2BSD-style job control, these general principles
can work slightly differently:
@.PP
When processing stop signals,
the psignal() function, called by the sending process, actually stops
the target process sometimes.  In these cases, the target process
never realizes that it received the signal or that it stopped.
However, in other cases, psignal() performs the usual process of
setting the flag (p_sig) requesting
that the target process stop itself the next time it runs.
@.PP
The issig() function, called by the target process, can actually stop the
target process.
@.PP
The psig() function is only called in the case where a user handler
has been provided for the job control signal.
@.PP
A more complete description of job control signal handling is contained
in the pseudocode below.
@.NH 3
psignal()
@.PP
To send SIGCONT to a target process:
@.PB
sending SIGCONT clears any pending stop signals;
if the target process is STOPPED but is also SLEEPING (p_wchan != 0)
    merely continue the process's SLEEP;

else if the target process is STOPPED and is NOT SLEEPING (p_wchan == 0)
    set the process RUNNING;
@.PE
@.PP
To send a stop signal (SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU, SIGSTOP) to a target process:
@.PB
sending a stop signal clears any pending SIGCONT;

if the target process is RUNNABLE or RUNNING
    note the pending signal in p_sig;

else if the target process is SLEEPING NON-interruptably
    note the pending signal in p_sig;

else if the target process is SLEEPING interruptably
     and IS catching the signal
    note the pending signal in p_sig and
    wakeup the process from its sleep;

else if the target process is SLEEPING interruptably
     and is NOT catching the signal
    stop the process by setting its state to SSTOP
    but leave it sleeping on its p_wchan;
    send SIGCLD to parent (if it expects BSD-style)
@.PE
@.PP
General note: sending a stop signal (other than SIGSTOP) to a child
of init causes the target process to be killed.
@.NH 3
issig()
@.PP
Issig() is called in all cases except where the process was
sleeping interruptably and was not catching the signal.
@.PP
To acknowledge a pending SIGCONT or stop signal:
@.PB
if in the middle of a VFORK
    hold off all stop signals (pretend they don't exist yet)

else if catching the signal
    return a request to invoke user signal handler via psig()

else if SIGCONT
    do nothing  /* pretend it doesn't exist */

else /* stop signals */
    stop the process by setting its state to SSTOP
    send SIGCLD to parent (if it expects BSD-style)
    call swtch() to dispatch another process
@.PE
@.PP
General note: sending a stop signal (other than SIGSTOP) to a child
of init causes the target process to be killed.
@.NH 3
psig()
@.PP
Psig() is called whenever issig() returns an indication
that a user handler is defined for a job control signal.
Psig() merely invokes the user signal handler.
@.NH 3
wakeup()
@.PP
The fact that a process is sleeping (waiting for an event to occur)
is indicated by two process state values:  p_wchan is non-zero,
indicating the event being waited for, and the process state is SSLEEP.
@.PP
Wakeup() usually causes all processes waiting (sleeping) on a specified
event to be awakened.  When a process is awakened two things
happen:  The process is removed from the sleep queue (p_wchan is cleared)
and it is added to the run queue.
@.PP
If, however, wakeup() discovers a process whose p_wchan matches the
specified event but whose process state is SSTOP (stopped) then
the process is removed from the sleep queue (indicating that the
waited for even has happened) but it is not placed on the run queue.
A subsequent SIGCONT will cause it to be placed on the run queue.
@.PP
Thus it is possible to have a process which is both sleeping (p_wchan
non-zero) and stopped (process state is SSTOP rather than SSLEEP).
@.NH 3
Signal Setup via init
@.PP
When init(8) launches any process it causes the process to ignore all
the job control stop signals (SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN, & SIGTTOU).  This allows
login shells which are not job control shells to automatically ignore
the signals.  Further, all descendent processes of such a login shell
will also ignore these signals unless they explicitly enable them.
@.NH 2
Foreground/Background Processes
@.NH 3
Basic Overview
@.PP
4.2BSD job control supports the notion of a process being in the
@.I foreground
or
@.I background.
The distinction is a background process is usually forced to stop when
it attempts to perform I/O (including most control operations) on its
controlling terminal, while a foreground process is not hindered.
@.PP
Specifically, when a background process attempts to read from its controlling
terminal it is sent the SIGTTIN signal which, by default, causes it to stop.
When it attempts to write to its controlling terminal and LTOSTOP has been
enabled for the terminal, then the process is sent the SIGTTOU signal which,
by default, causes it to stop.
If, however, a background process has chosen to catch the signal, the
specified user handler is invoked.
If the process is ignoring or masking the stop signal(s), then
the terminal I/O request returns an I/O error, EIO.
@.PP
A background process is one whose process group (p_pgrp) is not equal
to the process group of its controlling terminal (t_pgrp) (and t_pgrp
is not zero).  All other processes (including ones doing I/O to terminals
that are not their controlling terminals) are considered to be in the
foreground.
@.NH 3
Tty Driver Provisions
@.PP
To distinguish between foreground and background
programs the tty driver must perform checks on attempted I/O operations to
a process's controlling terminal.
This is done in several places.
@.PP
At the beginning of a read/write system call the tty driver checks
to see if the calling process is in the background.
If it is, then all processes in the
process group of the calling process are sent the appropriate
signal (SIGTTIN or SIGTTOU) unless the signal is masked or ignored
by the calling process.  In this case the driver returns the EIO error.
After the tty driver sends the signal, the calling process is put to
sleep waiting for the \fIlightning bolt event\fP\(dg.
@.FS
\(dg The lightning bolt event is a standard
@.UX
event which occurs frequently, for example, every second.
@.FE
This allows the calling process to receive the signal (and usually stop).
When the process returns from the sleep (usually by being continued) the
tty driver repeats the foreground/background check before proceeding with
the operation.
@.PP
When the process is in the foreground, the I/O operation proceeds.
In the case of a terminal read this usually results in the process being
put to sleep to wait for input characters to arrive.
At this point the user could type their suspend character (e.g., ^Z).
This causes the interrupt portion of the tty driver to send SIGTSTP
to the controlling terminal's process group (i.e., all processes which
are in the foreground).  In our scenario this
would include the process sleeping on terminal input, and this would
typically cause it to stop.
@.PP
When a sleeping process is stopped it is also left sleeping as well.
If, in this case, tty input characters subsequently arrived then the
process would
be awakened.  However, because it is also stopped, it would not be
set running; it would merely be "unslept".
@.PP
At some later time the process would be continued (e.g., via a csh
"fg" or "bg" command which sends SIGCONT).
If the process had not been previously unslept it would merely continue
its sleeping; it would receive no indication that it had stopped and
continued.
If the process had been previously unslept it would now be set running.
@.PP
When the process is set running it resumes execution in the tty driver.
Because a (potentially substantial) amount of time has elapsed and
because the process may have been stopped and restarted,
the tty driver is no longer sure whether this process is still in
the foreground.
So before checking if input characters are available, the tty driver
rechecks whether the process is in the foreground or background.
This is necessary because, in our
scenario, the stopped process could have been continued in the background
(via csh "bg").  To check this the tty driver merely repeats the
foreground/background check it made at the beginning of the system call.
@.sp 1
@.NH
SYSTEM V INCOMPATIBILITIES AND THEIR RESOLUTIONS
@.PP
Job control as implemented in 4.2BSD is incompatible with System V
semantics in some significant respects.  This section discusses
each of these incompatibilities and the resolution implemented in HP-UX
to maintain System V compatibility.
@.PP
The system interface needed to support 4.2BSD-style job control,
tailored for System V compatibility as discussed in this section,
is presented in the form of manual page excerpts in [Len86].
@.NH 2
Setpgrp(2) Changes
@.PP
Because the needed semantics of 4.2BSD setpgrp(2) conflict with the
semantics of System V setpgrp(2), the 4.2BSD setpgrp(2) function was renamed
to be setpgrp2(2).  (The choice of new name is arbitrary; setpgrp2 was chosen
in the same spirit as 4.2BSD's wait3(2).)
@.NH 2
SIGHUP Changes
@.PP
System V semantics state that when a process group leader dies, all processes
in the same process group are sent the SIGHUP signal which, by default, kills
all the processes.
@.PP
Job control shells execute a command by making all processes in the pipeline
belong to the same (brand new) process group and by making the first program
in the pipeline be the process group leader.  Typically, the first program in a
pipeline terminates before the other programs.  Under System V semantics,
this would cause the premature death of the remaining pipeline.  Because
of this, 4.2BSD does not generate SIGHUP on process group leader death.
@.PP
In order to support System V semantics and still allow job control to
function properly, HP-UX makes a distinction between a "System V process
group leader" and a "job control process group leader".  A System V
process group leader is given System V semantics (SIGHUP is generated)
and a job control process group leader is given 4.2BSD semantics (SIGHUP
is not generated).
A process which becomes a process group leader via setpgrp(2) is considered
to be a System V process group leader.
A process which becomes a process group leader via setpgrp2(2) is considered
to be a job control process group leader.
Since the HP-UX (and System V) init(1M) program calls setpgrp(2) on behalf
of all processes it spawns, all login shells start out as System V process
group leaders.  A process must explicitly call setpgrp2(2) to deviate from
the System V semantics.
@.NH 2
SIGCLD Changes
@.PP
Under System V, SIGCLD is sent to a process whenever one of its immediate
child processes dies.
Under 4.2BSD, SIGCLD (or its variant, SIGCHLD) is also generated
when a process changes state from running to stopped.
Since a System V application would not expect to receive SIGCLD
under these new circumstances and since a job control shell would
not be able to function properly without such notification, a compatible
compromise was developed.
@.PP
The (parent) process wishing to trap SIGCLD may set a flag when calling
the HP-UX sigvector(2)\(dg
@.FS
\(dg Sigvector(2) is an HP-UX extension proposed to the IEEE P1003 [Head85]
which supports both the reliable
signal operations of 4.2BSD sigvec(2) and the conventional signal
operations of System V signal(2).  In HP-UX, signal(2) is implemented
as a library using sigvector(2).
Note that the changes proposed here to sigvector(2) can be identically
made to 4.2BSD sigvec(2).
@.FE
\|routine to establish a signal handler.  This flag
will cause SIGCLD to be sent for stopped children, in addition to terminated
children.
A System V application using signal(2) will see the System V compatible
SIGCLD semantics.
@.NH 2
Controlling Terminal Changes
@.PP
Under System V, whenever a process group leader dies, the controlling terminal
associated with that process group (if any) is deallocated (disassociated from
that process group).
4.2BSD does not deallocate controlling terminals on process group leader death
for the following reason:
Job control shells make the lead process in every pipeline a process
group leader.  If the controlling terminal for each pipeline were deallocated
whenever the lead process terminated, then the remaining processes would
effectively become background processes (assuming they were currently in
the foreground) and would stop when any of them attempted subsequent I/O to the
terminal.
@.PP
To allow both semantics, controlling terminals are only deallocated when
a "System V process group leader" dies and not when a "job control process
group leader" dies.  (See the discussion of SIGHUP changes above.)
@.PP
However, this change leads to the following problem:
In order for a terminal to be allocated as a controlling terminal for a
new login, it must be deallocated when the previous login terminates.
System V relies on process group leader death to deallocate controlling
terminals (since all login shells are forced to be process group leaders
by init(1M)).
This is no longer reliable since login shells could become "job control
process group leaders".  Further, not all logins are spawned directly
by init(1M); the 4.2BSD rlogin facility is a prime example.
4.2BSD solves this problem by allowing a new login to join the process
group of the controlling terminal which is still allocated from the
previous login.  However this violates System V compatibility.
@.PP
The solution chosen was to mark a process that causes a controlling
terminal to be allocated and to deallocate the controlling terminal
whenever that process terminates.  This reliably catches logins which
are spawned either directly or indirectly from init(1M), whether they are
"System V process group leaders" or not.  Controlling terminals continue
to be deallocated on death of System V process group leaders using the
System V semantics.
@.NH 2
Security
@.PP
Several security holes exist in the 4.2BSD process group altering
mechanisms.  To plug these holes the following changes were made.
@.PP
4.2BSD setpgrp(2) allows a process to alter the process group associated
with another process to any value.
4.2BSD restricts this operation so that the
affected process must pass the same security restrictions enforced when
sending signals, or must be a descendent of the calling process.
However, this still allows a process to join a process group
already associated with another user.
To tighten this security, setpgrp2(2) was further restricted such that if the
specified new process group value is equal to the process ID (pid) or
process group ID of any existing processes, then all such processes must
pass the above security restrictions.
@.PP
Similarly, the 4.2BSD TIOCSPGRP ioctl(2) allows a terminal's process group
to be altered to any value.  This allows a user's terminal to easily become
an additional "controlling terminal" for another user's process group;
keyboard signals can be sent to the other user's processes, thus bypassing
the security enforced by kill(2).
Because of this, the TIOCSPGRP ioctl(2) was altered to enforce similar
security restrictions as setpgrp2(2).
@.PP
In System V and 4.2BSD, a process can obtain access to its controlling
terminal by opening the file \fI/dev/tty\fP.  Under System V, processes
left executing after a user's logout are allowed further access to
\fI/dev/tty\fP until the terminal it represents is reallocated as a
controlling terminal for a new login.  More specifically, \fI/dev/tty\fP
access is allowed whenever the process group ID of the leftover process
matches the process group ID of the terminal.  These IDs continue to match
immediately after logout (since both have been zeroed) until the terminal
is re-enabled for login by getty(1M).  (Note that when the new login
terminates, \fI/dev/tty\fP access is restored again to these prior processes
because the controlling terminal's process group ID is re-zeroed.)  Further,
if a process has its controlling terminal opened directly (not
via the \fI/dev/tty\fP synonym) then access is not restricted at all after
logout.
These System V semantics can constitute security problems.  However, they
are not explicitly required by the System V Interface Definition [ATT86].
@.PP
4.2BSD does nothing to hamper \fI/dev/tty\fP access for processes remaining
after logout.  The process group ID for the controlling terminal is not
altered, and, in fact, it is preserved even into the next login (since
subsequent logins join the already existing process group associated with the
terminal, if any).  These semantics also represent security problems.
However, 4.2BSD does prohibit access to the controlling terminal if it
is opened directly; this is accomplished when init(8) issues the vhangup(2)
system call.
@.PP
Although preserving the System V semantics for controlling terminal access
after logout is not deemed necessary or even recommended, it is easy to do
in the following way.
Whenever a process that allocated a controlling terminal dies, all processes
which share this controlling terminal have their process group ID zeroed.
This is analogous to, and occurs in addition to, the System V behavior of
zeroing the process group ID for all related processes when their process
group leader dies.  \fI/dev/tty\fP checks similar to System V can then
be employed.
@.NH 2
TTY Driver Considerations
@.PP
For System V compatibility, the suspend and delayed suspend characters
are defaulted to a disabled value (0377).  This means that job control
is "inactive" by default when a user logs on.  The user must explicitly
activate job control by defining either or both of these characters via
stty(1) or some similar interface.
@.PP
There should be no problem allowing 4.2BSD-style job control, as modified
here, to co-exist with System V's shell layers job control system.
(See shl(1) and sxt(7) in the System V Release 2 reference manuals.)
@.sp 1
@.NH
HP-UX
@.NH 2
Introduction
@.PP
HP-UX process groups are used in two major ways.
@.PP
System V process groups closely resemble the concept of a login session.
That is, all processes spawned during the same login session tend to
belong to the same process group, and keyboard signals are typically
sent to all processes spawned from the login session.
@.PP
Job control process groups closely resemble the concept of a task within
a login session, where a task represents a set of processes which
are affected as a group by job control operations.
Every time a job control shell (e.g., csh) spawns either a foreground
or background command, all processes in the pipeline (and their
descendents) are placed in their own unique process group with the
first command in the pipeline being the process group leader.
@.PP
A task is in the foreground when the process group associated with the
controlling terminal for the task (t_pgrp) is equal to the process
group associated with the processes in the task (p_pgrp).
Otherwise the task is in the background.
A job control shell moves a job between the foreground and background
by adjusting the terminal process group (t_pgrp) of the controlling
terminal.
@.PP
Note that a job control shell forms new process groups with process
group leaders
much more often than a non-job control (System V) shell usually does
(every command versus every login).
@.NH 2
HP-UX Process Group Handling
@.PP
In HP-UX, the process group associated with a process (p_pgrp)
can be altered via setpgrp(2) or setpgrp2(2).
@.PP
As in System V, setpgrp(2) can only set the process
group to equal the process ID (pid) of the process.  When this happens,
the resulting process with pid = p_pgrp is called a System V process group
leader.
@.PP
Setpgrp2(2) is analogous to setpgrp(2) except that it can affect
processes other than the current process and can cause the affected
process to adopt a process group other than that process's process ID (pid).
Setpgrp2(2) also forms job control process groups rather than System V
process groups.
Using setpgrp2(2), the calling process, or certain other processes, can either
become a job control process group leader or can cease to be a process
group leader.
@.PP
Because job control process groups are handled slightly differently
by HP-UX than System V process groups, HP-UX marks processes
that are job control process group leaders (i.e., that have
called setpgrp2(2) without subsequently calling setpgrp(2)).
@.PP
The init(1M) process spawns all other processes on the system either
directly or indirectly.  Before directly spawning a process
(after the fork(2) but before the exec(2)),
init calls setpgrp(2).
Thus all original children (not orphans) of init are forced to
start out as System V process group leaders.
@.PP
When a new process is created, it is assigned a new pid but it inherits
the process group number of its parent.  Thus child processes are, by
default, not process group leaders (although they can become a process
group leader via either setpgrp(2) or setpgrp2(2)).
@.PP
When a System V process group leader that has a controlling terminal
(see below) terminates, SIGHUP is sent to all processes in the same
process group.
Further, when a System V process group leader terminates, all processes
which belong to this process group are altered to belong to no process group
(their p_pgrp is set to zero).
@.PP
Also, whenever any process that allocated a controlling terminal terminates,
all processes that share this controlling terminal are altered to belong
to no process group (their p_pgrp is set to zero).
@.PP
When any process exits, any pending SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU, and SIGTSTP signals
are cleared from all descendent processes (not just immediate children).
@.NH 2
HP-UX Controlling Terminals
@.PP
A terminal that is currently open by a process may also be a "controlling
terminal" for a process group (collection of processes).  When certain
control characters are typed on a controlling terminal, signals are
sent by the terminal driver to all processes which belong to the process
group associated with the terminal.  These include the job control suspend
and delayed suspend characters.
@.PP
Controlling terminals also play a role in determining whether a process
is in the foreground or background.  See FOREGROUND/BACKGROUND PROCESSES
above.
@.PP
When a process becomes a System V process group leader (via setpgrp(2)) it
automatically loses its controlling terminal.
(This does not happen for a job control process group leader, i.e. when
calling setpgrp2(2).)
After this,
the first terminal (that is not already a controlling terminal)
opened by a process that is a (System V or job control) process group leader
is assigned to be the controlling terminal for that process;
also the process group associated with that terminal (t_pgrp) is set
equal to the process group associated with the process group leader
process (p_pgrp).
All child processes inherit the controlling terminal and
process group of their parent.
@.PP
More precisely, in HP-UX, the process group associated with a
terminal (t_pgrp), can be changed in the following ways:
@.IP (1)
When a terminal is opened by a System V or job control
process group leader (pid == p_pgrp)
that does not already have a controlling terminal,
it becomes the controlling terminal for that process group
(t_pgrp is set equal to p_pgrp) if it is not already a controlling
terminal.
@.IP (2)
When a System V process group leader (pid == p_pgrp) dies, if it has a
controlling terminal that is associated with the same process
group (t_pgrp == p_pgrp), that terminal is disassociated from that
process group (t_pgrp is set to zero).
@.IP (3)
When any process dies which originally caused a controlling terminal
to be created (see (1) above),
if it still has a controlling terminal,
that terminal is disassociated from its
process group (t_pgrp is set to zero).
@.IP (4)
When the last process to have a terminal open closes that terminal,
the terminal is disassociated from its process group (t_pgrp
is set to zero).
@.IP (5)
The TIOCSPGRP ioctl(2) call can explicitly change a terminal's
process group (t_pgrp) to any value within certain security restrictions.
This is used by a job control shell to change which set of processes
(process group) is in the foreground.
@.NH 2
HP-UX Typical Scenario
@.PP
This is a typical scenario for the birth and death of a login, its
controlling terminal, and the process groups associated with a job.
@.PP
The init(1M) process wants to enable a terminal for login.  It creates a
new process via fork(2) and calls setpgrp(2) to make it a System V process
group leader which also removes its controlling terminal.  Init then runs
the getty(1M) program as the process via exec(2).
Getty opens the terminal causing the terminal to become getty's controlling
terminal
and be associated with getty's process group (t_pgrp is set to p_pgrp).
As a side effect, this process is now marked as having created a controlling
terminal; when it dies the controlling terminal will be freed for re-use.
Getty replaces itself with login(1) which replaces itself with a login
shell.
@.PP
At this point one of two scenarios typically takes place.  The login shell
is either a job control shell (e.g., csh(1)) or it is not (e.g., sh(1)).
@.PP
If the login shell is not a job control shell then things proceed much
as they do on System V.
Usually no program calls setpgrp(2) or setpgrp2(2) and thus all
descendent processes
of the login shell are in the same process group and have the same
controlling terminal; keyboard signals are sent to all processes launched
during this session.
@.PP
If the login shell is a job control shell, then job control operations are
performed.
Csh begins to manipulate the process group associated with the
terminal (t_pgrp) via the TIOCSPGRP and TIOCGPGRP ioctl(2) calls and
the process group associated with its child processes (p_pgrp) via
setpgrp2(2) in order to allow job control.  This happens (briefly) in the
following way:
@.PP
Csh launches a pipeline by making all programs in the pipeline be
immediate descendents of csh.  (This is different from sh which makes
all programs in the pipeline except the last be descendents of the
last program in the pipeline.)
All programs in the pipeline belong to the same process group (not the
same as csh's process group) and the first program in the pipeline is
the process group leader (its pid is equal to the process group for the
pipeline).  This process is specially marked as a job control process
group leader since it was established via setpgrp2(2); this basically
prevents SIGHUP from being sent to the pipeline when the lead process dies.
If the pipeline is being launched in the foreground (or moved to the
foreground) then the process group associated with the terminal (t_pgrp)
is set to the process group of the pipeline via the TIOCSPGRP ioctl(2).
@.PP
When a logout occurs, the login shell dies.
Any pending SIGTTIN, SIGTTOU, and SIGTSTP signals are cleared for all
descendent processes.
All immediate child processes are inherited as orphans by init; if any are
currently stopped then they are killed (SIGKILL).
Since the login shell (actually the getty before it was overlaid) created
a controlling terminal, the controlling terminal is now freed (t_pgrp
is set to zero) so that it can be claimed as a controlling terminal by
a subsequent getty respawned by init; also, all processes which share
this controlling terminal have their process group (p_pgrp) set to zero.
@.PP
When a logout occurs and
the login shell is a System V process group leader, SIGHUP is sent
to all processes in the same process group, and the process group (p_pgrp)
of all descendent processes is set to zero.
@.PP
Note that there may continue to be background processes (previously
started by the
now defunct login shell) which continue to execute but
keyboard signals will no longer be sent to these processes (since
both t_pgrp and p_pgrp equal zero).
@.sp 1
@.NH
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
@.PP
The following people from Hewlett-Packard contributed to the interface
design and implementation of job control for HP-UX:
Jim Barton,
Dave Decot,
Larry Dwyer,
Jeff Glasson,
Rita Hanson,
Stephen Hares,
Steve Head,
Bob Lenk,
John Marvin,
Dave Mears,
Peter Notess,
Arn Schaeffer,
Eviatar Shafrir.
@.PP
Guy Harris from Sun Microsystems made many substantive comments and suggestions
which contributed to the interface design and to this paper.
@.sp 3
@.NH
REFERENCES
@.IP [ATT86] 15
\fISystem V Interface Definition\fP, Issue 2, AT&T, 1986.
@.IP [Bach84]
M. J. Bach and S. J. Buroff, "Multiprocessor
@.UX
Operating Systems",
\fIAT&T Bell Lab. Tech. J.\fP, \fB63,\fP No. 8 (October 1984),
pp. 1733-1749.
@.IP [Head85]
Stephen Head and Donn Terry, "Reliable Signals Proposal",
IEEE P1003 Proposal #P.042, Hewlett-Packard Co., September 11, 1985.
@.IP [Joy80]
William Joy, "An Introduction to the C Shell",
Computer Science Division, University of California
at Berkeley, November 1980.
@.IP [Len86]
David Lennert, Guy Harris, et. al.,
"System V Compatible BSD-style Job Control Facilities",
IEEE P1003 Proposal #P.047, Hewlett-Packard Co. & Sun Microsystems,
April 9, 1986.
@.IP [Ritch79]
Dennis M. Ritchie, "The
@.UX
I/O System",
\fIUNIX Programmer's Manual\fP, Seventh Edition, Volume 2b,
Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, January 1979.
@.IP [Roch85]
Marc J. Rochkind,
\fIAdvanced
@.UX
Programming\fP,
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
@.IP [Harris86]
Guy Harris, "Notes on Signal, Terminal Interface, and User/Group ID
Handling Proposals", IEEE P1003 Proposal #P.045, Sun Microsystems,
January 11, 1986.
@.IP [Thom78]
K. Thompson, "UNIX Implementation",
\fIBell System Tech. J.\fP, \fB57,\fP No. 6 (July - August 1978),
pp. 1931-1946.
@.IP [UCB83]
\fIUNIX Programmer's Manual\fP, 4.2 Berkeley Software Distribution, Virtual
VAX-11 Version, Computer Science Division, University of California
at Berkeley, August 1983.
@.PP
@.bp
@.DS C
APPENDIX

JOB CONTROL MANUAL PAGE EXCERPTS
@.DE
@.PP
The following pages contain the
@.UX
manual pages which are effected by adding a System V compatible
implementation of 4.2BSD job control.  Note that each manual page
generally contains only that portion of text which differs from the
System V manual page of the same name.  Sometimes, unchanged text
is provided for locality reference.  Changed text lines are flagged
with change bars.
@//E*O*F jobpaper.ms//
chmod u=rw,g=rw,o=r jobpaper.ms

echo Inspecting for damage in transit...
temp=/tmp/shar$$; dtemp=/tmp/.shar$$
trap "rm -f $temp $dtemp; exit" 0 1 2 3 15
cat > $temp <<\!!!
   1200   8792  53685 jobpaper.ms
!!!
wc  jobpaper.ms | sed 's=[^ ]*/==' | diff -b $temp - >$dtemp
if [ -s $dtemp ]
then echo "Ouch [diff of wc output]:" ; cat $dtemp
else echo "No problems found."
fi
exit 0


Volume-Number: Volume 7, Number 54