home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: hadron!jsdy@seismo.UUCP (Joseph S. D. Yao)
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 86 04:14:29 edt
- Organization: Hadron, Inc., Fairfax, VA
-
- In article <5638@ut-sally.UUCP> you write:
- >From: elsie!ado@seismo.UUCP
- >While it's true that no UNIX files date back to before January 1, 1970,
- >there *are* uses for times before that epoch: in personnel data bases where
- >birth dates are recorded; in data bases recording astronomical events;
- >in stock market price data bases (as used by chartist fanatics); and elsewhere.
-
- These should be recorded in the DATE format of your DBMS, not as a
- longint! If your DBMS has no DATE format (tsk!), it should be recorded
- as three [or six] ints. Yes, I know you'll have to compare via a
- procedure instead of an op; see the (tsk!) above.
-
- >(And what of all those old 7094 executables that are being used on IBM machines
- >running UNIX or a cousin? :-))
-
- What of them?
-
- >I see more use in the short run for being able to record times between
- >1901 and 1970 that I see for being able to record times after 2038.
-
- Possibly. But I plan to be living (and making plans) well into the
- 2000's. I don't want to run up against a wall. (I already have, in
- that versions of Unix today don't allow such dates, and I have -- I
- don't remember why! -- tried to use them.)
-
- In addition, you would not be "retaining" any capability -- the systems
- I know tend to turn negative dates into something on the order of:
- Sat Feb 5 01:28:16 2^A06
- (This is -(60*60*24): the '^A' is, yes, a control-A.)
- Any date after 31 Dec 1999 up to some value >> 2^31 loses everything
- after the '2' in the year: I think the second char of the year is
- being converted to a control-@, or NUL character.
-
- (Results from 4BSD and Ultrix on VAX and 680x0 processors. I haven't
- tried this on the s5/VAX.)
- --
-
- Joe Yao hadron!jsdy@seismo.{CSS.GOV,ARPA,UUCP}
- jsdy@hadron.COM (not yet domainised)
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 6, Number 43
-
-