home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: hplabs!hao!vianet!devine@pyramid.UUCP (Bob Devine)
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 86 23:13:44 mdt
-
- [ This is really not directly related to IEEE 1003.1, since
- it solely discusses the details of an *implementation* and
- says nothing about the *interface*. However, it does
- address something which has been previously discussed
- in this newsgroup, and I can't think of a better place for it.
- However, please do detailed line-by-line discussions of this
- through mail among interested parties.
-
- Could we find a new topic?
- -mod]
-
- Arthur Olson's recent posting to mod.sources included the updated
- settz data tables. This reply in mod.std.unix is to correct some
- of the entries in the table and re-raise my points about what is the
- best implementation. I believe everyone has agreed on Robert Elz's
- direction for the POSIX document wording.
-
- The lines beginning with "> " are from Arthur Olson.
-
- > Bob Devine has written that ". . .your table is wrong for MostNA in 1974.
- > The correct ending date is 10/27 not 11/24." Yet on a 4.1bsd VAX/11-750
- > system, compiling and executing the program
- > [[[ program omitted ]]]
- > results in the output
- > Fri Nov 1 22:40:00 1974
- > isdst: 1
- > For now we'll stay with 4.1bsd's version.
-
- The date I gave is correct. Any version of Unix that uses 11/24 is
- simply wrong. The dates for 1974 and 1975 DST rules are:
- 1974 1/6 to 10/27
- 1975 2/28 to 10/26
- Even the source for Xenix V that I just checked has it wrong. Believe
- me folks, this comes directly from Dept of Transportation. (If you are
- wondering why DOT has responsibility for such info, drop me a line. BD)
-
- > Note also this from munnari!kre:
- > "I recall also being told by someone once that Canada didn't have
- > the DST variations in 74/75 that the US did, but I am not nearly
- > sure enough of this to add anything."
- > If Canada or Mexico decide not to follow the US change in DST that takes
- > effect in 1987, additions had best be made below.
-
- Canada did not follow the fuel follies for '4 and '5.
- Please split the rules *by country*, not by continent, to avoid such problems.
- The "MostNA" rules listed are incorrect for Canada and Mexico!
-
- > Before the Uniform Time Act of 1966 took effect in 1967, observance of
- > Daylight Saving Time in the US was by local option, except during wartime.
-
- This is the acid-test of all proposals for handling DST rules. When I
- submitted my suggestion to mod.std-unix last February (that now seems like
- the distant past), I used the most common way of representing the changes.
- The reason was I had examined all the world-wide rules and after silently
- tearing my hair out trying to come up with a small table, decided to
- go with the only way that I had any hope of getting right. To represent
- all of the worldwide rules for just +/- 5 years requires several hundred
- lines. No speed would ever be possible for a full table. My way was to
- just represent the current year. At best, that simple formula would work
- for many years; at worst, changes can't be handled (which is why folks
- did fall in love with it).
-
- The US tried to standardize DST rules in that '66 Act. But, of course,
- there are still many exceptions. Plus, checking dates prior to it is
- painful. Now imagine how the US was before 1967 and apply that to the
- world. You get the feeling of near chaos?
-
- I have since come to the conclusion that the best way to represent
- DST and timezone information is a single rule plus an "exceptions database".
- Only if the simple rule doesn't work (e.g., past or future years, other
- timezones) is the database used. This way, rules can be added as needed.
- Or the entire database can be empty with the single rule used for all
- conversions.
-
- DST is almost like the (jeez, I forgot who said it) quote about the
- universe "being more complicated that can be possibly imagined".
- This is not an exact analogy, but, at least physical laws are controlled
- by Congress!
-
-
- ># Rule NAME FROM TO TYPE IN ON AT SAVE LETTER/S
- >Rule MostNA 1967 1973 - Apr lastSun 2:00 1:00 D
- >Rule MostNA 1967 1973 - Oct lastSun 2:00 0 S
-
- Note: the rules for 1967 - 1973 depend on what state/territory you are in.
- For example, Michigan is an exception to the rule for 1969-72 but not for
- 1967-68. Eastern Indiana is another tricky one for this period. Again,
- note that this is *after* the '66 Act that tried to standardize DST.
-
- >Rule MostNA 1974 only - Jan 6 2:00 1:00 D
- >Rule MostNA 1974 only - Nov 24 2:00 0 S
-
- Should be ====> Oct 27
-
- ># New names
- >Zone Newfoundland -3:30 - NST # Is DST now observed here?
- ># If so, when did it start?
-
- Newfoundland observes DST by the same rules as the rest of Canada -- the
- last Sunday in April to the last Sunday in October. It has followed this
- pattern since 1951. Changeover time is 2am.
-
- Saskatchewan is another matter...part in EST; part in CST which doesn't use DST.
-
- ># Nonstandard mainland areas:
-
- These rules are impossible to formulate. The amazing variety of
- different DST rules makes such a tabularizing absurd. The rules vary
- by state, by regions within states, by areas that have not yet even
- been admitted to the union, by county, by city, and seemingly by whim.
-
- >Rule SomeUS 1918 1919 - Mar lastSun 2:00 1:00 D
- >Rule SomeUS 1918 1919 - Oct lastSun 2:00 0 S
- >Rule SomeUS 1942 only - Feb 9 2:00 1:00 W # War
- >Rule SomeUS 1945 only - Sep 30 2:00 0 S
- >
- >Zone East-Indiana -5:00 SomeUS E%sT # Usually standard near South Bend
- >Zone Arizona -7:00 SomeUS M%sT # Usually standard in Arizona
- >
- ># And then there's Hawaii.
- >Rule Hawaii 1947 only - Jun 8 2:00 0 S
-
- The information I have does not show any DST changes in 1947. DST was
- not observed in the period 1946-present.
-
- Bob Devine
-
- Volume-Number: Volume 6, Number 37
-
-