home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- Here are some results of a few samples taken before and after
- installing HPFS.
-
- I used the criteria search function in OSRM2 to pull the records that
- show medium activity and the suffering I was going through with IO
- response time.
-
- I also included low activity to show that even as the system activity
- starts to increase under HPFS there is still better response time next
- to the inactive FAT system.
-
- This installation has saved me a IO upgrade as response time is back
- at the acceptable level. Further tuning of data set placement will
- provide even better service.
-
- Please post these anywhere you like. The before and after comments
- are mine and OSRM2 will not produce them. Yet.
-
- Line key:
- Line 1 = Minimum ( as well as record information )
- Line 2 = Average
- Line 3 = Maximum
-
- D1 - D5 are the allowable partitions to test in OSRM2
- Before HPFS D1=E D2=G
- After HPFS D1=E D2=F D3=C D4=D
- D2 are the same but designators changed because of deleted
- partitions.
-
- OSRM2 Report And Analysis Utility
- Criteria Search Results
- (c) Copyright 1989, C.O.L. Consulting LTD.
-
- Test : Hour GEQ 14 & Hour LEQ 23
-
- Month = 10
-
- Day Time Count Type CPU D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 MEMORY
-
- Before HPFS
- 17 19:36 15 2 0 33 82 0 0 0 0
- 446 161 133 0 0 0 101
- 2225 243 487 0 0 0 112
-
- After HPFS
- 21 16:45 15 2 0 29 45 24 22 0 0
- 481 52 58 40 64 0 95
- 1394 57 82 42 64 0 96
-
- Before HPFS
- 20 23:33 15 2 0 41 45 0 0 0 0
- 8 83 91 0 0 0 89
- 53 84 91 0 0 0 96
-
- After HPFS and improvements even at busier times!!!
- 21 14:25 15 2 0 31 31 20 21 0 0
- 13 54 48 39 34 0 0
- 2204 58 52 46 34 0 96
-
- 21 14:40 15 2 0 53 31 26 22 0 0
- 44 71 47 51 59 0 95
- 614 120 53 56 66 0 96
-
- 21 14:56 15 2 0 31 25 46 40 0 0
- 95 63 82 69 76 0 95
- 729 64 83 102 89 0 96
-
-
- Frank V. Castellucci
- C.O.L. Consulting LTD.
- (914) 277-4312