home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Info 1997 December
/
Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso
/
ietf
/
frnetmib
/
frnetmib-minutes-93jul.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-09-21
|
4KB
|
111 lines
CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
Reported by James W. Watt/Newbridge Networks Corporation
Minutes of the Frame Relay Service MIB Working Group (FRNETMIB)
Documents Discussed
o Service Management Architecture for Virtual Connection Services
(1 July)
o Definitions of Managed Objects for Frame Relay Services (2 July)
Issues Discussed
o Frame Relay Forum (FRF)
Andy Malis, Chair of the FRF, presented the work plan for the FRF
effort. The start and end dates of the FRF effort match those of
the FRNETMIB Working Group and there are some intermediate
meetings.
The goal shared by both groups is to have a standard MIB by
December of 1993.
o Service Management Architecture
Ken Rodemann gave a presentation based on the 2 July draft of his
document. The general reaction was positive, and in particular the
``(virtual-)circuit table'' was identified as a work item to be
discussed with the ATOMMIB and IFMIB Working Groups.
Discussion of the rest of the Service Management Architecture
document will continue in the FRNETMIB Working Group.
o Draft MIB
Based on discussions of the 2 July draft, consensus was reached on
the following:
- The PVC table was split into a ``flow'' (or connection) table
and an end-point table.
- The per-PVC InUnits and OutUnits counters were renamed to
InOctets and OutOctets for consistency with other MIBs and
frPVCUnitSize was renamed to (something like) OctetResolution
(see action item #2).
- The LPortNetAddress object was dropped as a duplicate of
ifPhysAddr.
- A reference to ifPhysAddress was placed in the description of
LPortNumPlan.
1
- The frPVCConnectStatus trap needs to have words to prevent
flooding a manager with traps when a whole link fails. There
is an added complexity with respect to the modeling of NNI
links (see action item #3).
- The next draft of the MIB will be in SNMPv2.
- The focus of the MIB is primarily Customer Network Management
(CNM) of PVCs for Frame Relay; however, it may be useful for
other purposes.
Action Items
1. Tracy Brown to issue a revised MIB draft (in SNMP V2 format) prior
to the August FRF meeting.
2. Tracy Brown to find consensus on where ``unit size'' should be in
the MIB (end-point table or logical port table).
3. Tracy Brown, Ken Rodemann and James Watt to clarify wording on trap
suppression in MIB draft.
Attendees
Masuma Ahmed mxa@sabre.bellcore.com
David Arneson arneson@ctron.com
Fred Baker fbaker@acc.com
Caralyn Brown cbrown@wellfleet.com
Tracy Brown tacox@mail.bellcore.com
Theodore Brunner tob@thumper.bellcore.com
Steve Buchko stevebu@newbridge.com
Chris Chiotasso chris@andr.ub.com
David Fresquez fresquez@vnet.ibm.com
Andrew Malis malis@maelstrom.timeplex.com
Keith McCloghrie kzm@hls.com
George Mouradian gvm@arch3.att.com
Daniel Myers dan@nsd.3com.com
Zbigniew Opalka zopalka@agile.com
David Perkins dperkins@synoptics.com
Aiko Pras pras@cs.utwente.nl
Dan Romascanu dan@lannet.com
Marshall Rose mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us
Jean-Bernard Schmitt jbs@vnet.ibm.com
Tibor Schonfeld tibor@qsun.att.com
Kaj Tesink kaj@cc.bellcore.com
Dono van-Mierop dono_van_mierop@3mail.3com.com
James Watt james@newbridge.com
Peter Wilson peter_wilson@3mail.3com.com
2