home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Info 1997 December
/
Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso
/
drafts
/
draft_n_r
/
draft-rfced-info-chatel-00.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-03-29
|
2KB
|
57 lines
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 1919:
Title: Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies
Author: M. Chatel
Date: March 1996
Mailbox: mchatel@pax.eunet.ch
Pages: 35
Characters: 87,374
Updates/Obsoletes: none
URL: ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1919.txt
Many modern IP security systems (also called "firewalls" in the trade)
make use of proxy technology to achieve access control. This document
explains "classical" and "transparent" proxy techniques and attempts
to provide rules to help determine when each proxy system may be used
without causing problems.
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@CNRI.RESTON.VA.US. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@ISI.EDU.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@ISI.EDU with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info@ISI.EDU
Subject: getting rfcs
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to admin@DS.INTERNIC.NET. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@ISI.EDU. Please consult RFC 1543, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
Joyce K. Reynolds
USC/Information Sciences Institute