home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Info 1997 December
/
Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso
/
drafts
/
draft_ietf_i
/
draft-ietf-ion-scsp-nhrp-00.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1997-04-16
|
12KB
|
336 lines
Internetworking Over NBMA James V. Luciani
INTERNET-DRAFT (Bay Networks)
<draft-ietf-ion-scsp-nhrp-00.txt> Expires September 1997
A Distributed NHRP Service Using SCSP
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ds.internic.net (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net
(Europe), ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific
Rim).
Abstract
This document describes a method for distributing an NHRP service
within a LIS[1]. This method uses the Server Cache Synchronization
Protocol (SCSP)[2] to synchronize the client information databases
held by NHRP Servers (NHSs) within a LIS.
1. Introduction
NHRP Clients (NHCs) register their existence and reachability
information with NHRP Servers (NHSs). There may be multiple NHSs in
a given Logical IP Subnet (LIS). NHCs do not necessarily register
with all NHSs in a LIS; however, all NHCs need to be able to query at
least one NHS about any NHC within the LIS. Thus, the contents of
the NHS databases in a LIS need to be synchronized across the LIS.
The Server Cache Synchronization Protocol (SCSP) solves the
generalized server synchronization/cache-replication problem for
distributed databases and thus SCSP may be applied to the NHS
Luciani, et al. [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT SCSP Expires September 1997
database synchronization problem within the LIS.
SCSP is defined in two parts: the protocol independent part and the
client/server protocol specific part. The protocol independent part
is defined in [2] whereas this document will specify the
client/server protocol specific part where NHRP is the client/server
protocol.
This document is separate from [2] because it was felt that it was
desirable to allow the client/server protocol specific part
specification for NHRP to progress independently from the protocol
independent specification.
2. Overview
All NHSs belonging to a Logical IP Subnet (LIS)[1] are said to belong
to a Server Group (SG). An SG is identified by, not surprisingly,
its SGID which is contained in a field in all SCSP packets. All SCSP
packets contain a Protocol ID (PID) field as well. This PID field is
set to 0x0002 to signify that SCSP synchronizing NHS databases as
opposed to synchronizing some other protocol's databases (see Section
B.2.0.1 of [2] for more details). In general, PIDs for SCSP will be
assigned by IANA upon request given that a client/server protocol
specific specification has been written. In the case of NHRP, the
client/server protocol specific specification was initially written
at the same time as SCSP, and thus a PID=0x0002 was assigned by the
author.
SCSP places no topological requirements upon an NHRP SG. Obviously,
however, the resultant graph of NHSs must span the set of NHSs to be
synchronized. For more information about the client/server protocol
independent part of SCSP, the reader is encouraged to see [2].
When a SG is using SCSP to synchronization, an NHC will register with
only one NHS, but the NHC MAY use any NHS in the SG. When an NHC
wishes to leave a SG, the NHC MUST do one of the following: 1) the
NHC MUST send an NHRP Purge Request for itself requesting a reply and
it MUST wait for an NHRP Purge Reply, 2) the NHC MUST keep the
Request ID it used when registering itself in non-volatile RAM and
use a Request ID larger than the one saved when re-registering, or 3)
the NHC MUST not re-register for a time equal to the Holding Time
specified in the previous registration. It is necessary to do one of
the previous in order to prevent the unlikely case of race conditions
from occurring during updated. In the case where method 2 is used,
the NHS uses its ID as the OID and the Request ID as the CSA Sequence
Number.
Luciani, et al. [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT SCSP Expires September 1997
3. Format of the CSA Record NHRP Specific Part
CSA Records in SCSP contain a "Client/Server Protocol Specific Part"
which contains the non-protocol independent information for a given
server's cache entry.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Address Family Number | NHRP Protocol Type |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Snap |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Snap | NHRP Vers Num | Flags |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Request ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| State | Prefix Length | unused |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Maximum Transmission Unit | Holding Time |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cli Addr T/L | Cli SAddr T/L | Cli Proto Len | Preference |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Client Subnetwork Address (variable length) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Client Subnetwork Subaddress (variable length) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Client Protocol Address (variable length) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The following six fields contain values specified in the common
header of the mandatory part of an NHRP Registration Request or NHRP
Purge Request packet which caused the
creation/deletion/modification/update/etc. of an NHS's cache entry.
Address Family Number
Defines the type of "link layer" addresses being carried. This
number is taken from the 'address family number' list specified in
[3]. This field is the same field which would be supplied in an
NHRP packet in the ar$afn field.
NHRP Protocol Type
This field is the same field which would be supplied in an NHRP
packet in the ar$pro.type field.
Snap
This field is the same field which would be supplied in an NHRP
packet in the ar$pro.snap field.
Luciani, et al. [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT SCSP Expires September 1997
NHRP Vers Num
This field indicates what version of generic address mapping and
management protocol that is represented by this message. This
field contains 0x01 for the NHRP protocol version 1. This field is
the same field which would be supplied in an NHRP packet in the
ar$op.version field.
Flags
Defined flags are as follows:
0 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|U| unused |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
U
This is the Uniqueness bit.
This field is the same field which was supplied in the NHRP
Registration Request which created the cache entry being
synchronized.
Request ID
This field contains the Request ID value placed in the cache entry
of the NHS as a result of an NHRP Registration Request. This NHS
is the NHS causing a synchronization event.
State
This field contains a value which represents the new state of the
client.
0 - Client is registered and available.
1 - Client reregistered.
2 - Client has been purged.
3 - No such client data in server cache
Note that a time-out of a cache entry does not cause a CSA Record
to be sent because, if everything is working properly then all NHSs
have the cache entry timing out at the same time. Thus, the
individual NHSs would take the appropriate actions necessary.
The following ten fields contain values specified in or derived from
the CIE of an NHRP Registration Request or NHRP Purge Request packet
which caused the creation/deletion/modification/update/etc. of an
NHS's cache entry.
Prefix Length
Luciani, et al. [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT SCSP Expires September 1997
This field contains the internetwork layer address prefix length
value covered by the cache entry being synchronized.
Maximum Transmission Unit
This field contains a value supplied by or derived from information
in the CIE of the NHRP Registration Request packet.
Holding Time
The Holding Time field specifies the number of seconds remaining
for which the Next Hop NBMA information specified in the CIE of the
NHRP Registration Request is considered to be valid by the NHS
initiating the synchronization event.
Cli Addr T/L
Type & length of next hop NBMA address (see [1]).
Cli SAddr T/L
Type & length of next hop NBMA subaddress (see [1]).
Cli Proto Len
This field holds the length in octets of the Client Protocol
Address.
Preference
This field specifies the preference value for use of the next hop
NBMA information specified.
Client NBMA Address
This is the client's NBMA address.
Client NBMA SubAddress
This is the client's NBMA subaddress.
Client Protocol Address
This is the client's internetworking layer address.
4. Values for SCSP Protocol Independent Part
The following sections give values for fields of the SCSP Protocol
Independent Part of the various SCSP messages.
4.1 Values for the SCSP "Mandatory Common Part"
Protocol ID = 0x0002
Sender ID Len = 0x04
Recvr ID Len = 0x04
Luciani, et al. [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT SCSP Expires September 1997
See Section B.2.0.1 of [2] for a detailed description of these
fields.
4.2 Values for the SCSP "CSAS Record"
Cache Key Len = 0x04
Orig ID Len = 0x04
See Section B.2.0.2 of [2] for a detailed description of these
fields.
References
[1] "NBMA Next Hop Resolution Protocol (NHRP)", Luciani, Katz, Piscitello,
Cole, draft-ietf-rolc-nhrp-11.txt.
[2] "Server Cache Synchronization Protocol", Luciani, Armitage, Halpern,
draft-ietf-ion-scsp-01.txt.
[3] Assigned Numbers, J. Reynolds and J. Postel, RFC 1700.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank (in no particular order) Maxine Burns of ISR.
I would also like to thank the members of the ION working group of
the IETF, whose review and discussion of this document has been
invaluable.
Author's Address
James V. Luciani
Bay Networks, Inc.
3 Federal Street, BL3-04
Billerica, MA 01821
phone: +1-508-916-4734
email: luciani@baynetworks.com
Luciani, et al. [Page 6]