home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Info 1997 December
/
Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso
/
drafts
/
draft_ietf_i
/
draft-ietf-intserv-guaranteed-mib-02.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-11-22
|
16KB
|
813 lines
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
Integrated Services Management Information Base
Guaranteed Service Extensions
draft-ietf-intserv-guaranteed-mib-02.txt
Thu Nov 21 16:08:10 PST 1996
Fred Baker
Cisco Systems
519 Lado Drive
Santa Barbara, California 93111
fred@cisco.com
1. Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are
working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet
Drafts.
Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted
by other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use
Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other
than as a "working draft" or "work in progress."
Please check the I-D abstract listing contained in each
Internet Draft directory to learn the current status of this
or any other Internet Draft.
2. Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base
(MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-
based internets. In particular, it defines objects for
managing the the interface attributes defined in the
Guaranteed Service of the Integrated Services Model. Comments
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 1]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
should be made to the Integrated Services Working Group, int-
serv@isi.edu.
This memo does not, in its draft form, specify a standard for
the Internet community.
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 2]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
3. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework
The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework consists of four major
components. They are:
o RFC 1441 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
describing and naming objects for the purpose of
management.
o RFC 1213 defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects
for the Internet suite of protocols.
o RFC 1445 which defines the administrative and other
architectural aspects of the framework.
o RFC 1448 which defines the protocol used for network
access to managed objects.
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the
purpose of experimentation and evaluation.
3.1. Object Definitions
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store,
termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the
MIB are defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation
One (ASN.1) defined in the SMI. In particular, each object
type is named by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively
assigned name. The object type together with an object
instance serves to uniquely identify a specific instantiation
of the object. For human convenience, we often use a textual
string, termed the descriptor, to refer to the object type.
4. Overview
4.1. Textual Conventions
Several new data types are introduced as a textual convention
in this MIB document. These textual conventions enhance the
readability of the specification and can ease comparison with
other specifications if appropriate. It should be noted that
the introduction of the these textual conventions has no
effect on either the syntax nor the semantics of any managed
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 3]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
objects. The use of these is merely an artifact of the
explanatory method used. Objects defined in terms of one of
these methods are always encoded by means of the rules that
define the primitive type. Hence, no changes to the SMI or
the SNMP are necessary to accommodate these textual
conventions which are adopted merely for the convenience of
readers and writers in pursuit of the elusive goal of clear,
concise, and unambiguous MIB documents.
5. Definitions
INTEGRATED-SERVICES-GUARANTEED-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE FROM SNMPv2-SMI
RowStatus FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF
intSrv FROM INTEGRATED-SERVICES-MIB
ifIndex FROM IF-MIB;
-- This MIB module uses the extended OBJECT-TYPE macro as
-- defined in [9].
intSrvGuaranteed MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "9611211608Z" -- Thu Nov 21 16:08:10 PST 1996
ORGANIZATION "IETF Integrated Services Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
" Fred Baker
Postal: Cisco Systems
519 Lado Drive
Santa Barbara, California 93111
Tel: +1 805 681 0115
E-Mail: fred@cisco.com"
DESCRIPTION
"The MIB module to describe the Guaranteed Service of
the Integrated Services Protocol"
::= { intSrv 4 }
intSrvGuaranteedObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { intSrvGuaranteed 1 }
intSrvGuaranteedNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { intSrvGuaranteed 2 }
intSrvGuaranteedConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { intSrvGuaranteed 3 }
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 4]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
-- The Integrated Services Interface Attributes Database
-- contains information that is shared with other reservation
-- procedures such as ST-II.
intSrvGuaranteedIfTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IntSrvGuaranteedIfEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The attributes of the system's interfaces ex-
ported by the Guaranteed Service."
::= { intSrvGuaranteedObjects 1 }
intSrvGuaranteedIfEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IntSrvGuaranteedIfEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The reservable attributes of a given inter-
face."
INDEX { ifIndex }
::= { intSrvGuaranteedIfTable 1 }
IntSrvGuaranteedIfEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
intSrvGuaranteedIfBacklog INTEGER,
intSrvGuaranteedIfDelay INTEGER,
intSrvGuaranteedIfSlack INTEGER,
intSrvGuaranteedIfStatus RowStatus
}
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 5]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
intSrvGuaranteedIfBacklog OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (0..'0FFFFFFF'h)
UNITS "bytes"
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Backlog parameter is the data backlog
resulting from the vagaries of how a specific
implementation deviates from a strict bit-by-
bit service. So, for instance, for packetized
weighted fair queueing, Backlog is set to the
Maximum Packet Size.
The Backlog term is measured in units of bytes.
An individual element can advertise a Backlog
value between 1 and 2**28 (a little over 250
megabytes) and the total added over all ele-
ments can range as high as (2**32)-1. Should
the sum of the different elements delay exceed
(2**32)-1, the end-to-end error term should be
(2**32)-1."
::= { intSrvGuaranteedIfEntry 1 }
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 6]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
intSrvGuaranteedIfDelay OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (0..'0FFFFFFF'h)
UNITS "microseconds"
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Delay parameter at each service element
should be set to the maximum packet transfer
delay (independent of bucket size) through the
service element. For instance, in a simple
router, one might compute the worst case amount
of time it make take for a datagram to get
through the input interface to the processor,
and how long it would take to get from the pro-
cessor to the outbound interface (assuming the
queueing schemes work correctly). For an Eth-
ernet, it might represent the worst case delay
if the maximum number of collisions is experi-
enced.
The Delay term is measured in units of one mi-
crosecond. An individual element can advertise
a delay value between 1 and 2**28 (somewhat
over two minutes) and the total delay added all
elements can range as high as (2**32)-1.
Should the sum of the different elements delay
exceed (2**32)-1, the end-to-end delay should
be (2**32)-1."
::= { intSrvGuaranteedIfEntry 2 }
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 7]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
intSrvGuaranteedIfSlack OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (0..'0FFFFFFF'h)
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"If a network element uses a certain amount of
slack, Si, to reduce the amount of resources
that it has reserved for a particular flow, i,
the value Si should be stored at the network
element. Subsequently, if reservation re-
freshes are received for flow i, the network
element must use the same slack Si without any
further computation. This guarantees consisten-
cy in the reservation process.
As an example for the use of the slack term,
consider the case where the required end-to-end
delay, Dreq, is larger than the maximum delay
of the fluid flow system. In this, Ctot is the
sum of the Backlog terms end to end, and Dtot
is the sum of the delay terms end to end. Dreq
is obtained by setting R=r in the fluid delay
formula, and is given by
b/r + Ctot/r + Dtot.
In this case the slack term is
S = Dreq - (b/r + Ctot/r + Dtot).
The slack term may be used by the network ele-
ments to adjust their local reservations, so
that they can admit flows that would otherwise
have been rejected. A service element at an in-
termediate network element that can internally
differentiate between delay and rate guarantees
can now take advantage of this information to
lower the amount of resources allocated to this
flow. For example, by taking an amount of slack
s <= S, an RCSD scheduler [5] can increase the
local delay bound, d, assigned to the flow, to
d+s. Given an RSpec, (Rin, Sin), it would do so
by setting Rout = Rin and Sout = Sin - s.
Similarly, a network element using a WFQ
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 8]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
scheduler can decrease its local reservation
from Rin to Rout by using some of the slack in
the RSpec. This can be accomplished by using
the transformation rules given in the previous
section, that ensure that the reduced reserva-
tion level will not increase the overall end-
to-end delay."
::= { intSrvGuaranteedIfEntry 3 }
intSrvGuaranteedIfStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"'valid' on interfaces that are configured for
the Guaranteed Service."
::= { intSrvGuaranteedIfEntry 4 }
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 9]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
-- No notifications are currently defined
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 10]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
-- conformance information
intSrvGuaranteedGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { intSrvGuaranteedConformance 1 }
intSrvGuaranteedCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { intSrvGuaranteedConformance 2 }
-- compliance statements
intSrvGuaranteedCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement "
MODULE -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
intSrvGuaranteedIfAttribGroup
}
::= { intSrvGuaranteedCompliances 1 }
intSrvGuaranteedIfAttribGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
intSrvGuaranteedIfBacklog,
intSrvGuaranteedIfDelay,
intSrvGuaranteedIfSlack,
intSrvGuaranteedIfStatus
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"These objects are required for Systems sup-
porting the Guaranteed Service of the Integrat-
ed Services Architecture."
::= { intSrvGuaranteedGroups 2 }
END
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 11]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
6. Acknowledgements
This document was produced by the Integrated Services Working
Group.
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 12]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
7. References
[1] M.T. Rose (editor), Management Information Base for
Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets, Internet
Working Group Request for Comments 1213. Network
Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park,
California, (May, 1990).
[2] Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Specification of Abstract Syntax
Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for
Standardization. International Standard 8824, (December,
1987).
[3] Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Specification of Basic Encoding Rules
for Abstract Notation One (ASN.1), International
Organization for Standardization. International Standard
8825, (December, 1987).
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 13]
Internet Draft IS Guaranteed Service MIB November 1996
Table of Contents
1 Status of this Memo ................................... 1
2 Abstract .............................................. 1
3 The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework ............... 3
3.1 Object Definitions .................................. 3
4 Overview .............................................. 3
4.1 Textual Conventions ................................. 3
5 Definitions ........................................... 4
5.1 Interface Attributes Database ....................... 4
5.2 Notifications ....................................... 9
6 Acknowledgements ...................................... 12
7 References ............................................ 13
Baker Expires May 1997 [Page 14]