home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Internet Info 1997 December
/
Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso
/
drafts
/
draft_ietf_a_c
/
draft-ietf-cidrd-classless-inaddr-02.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-11-26
|
16KB
|
503 lines
Network Working Group Havard Eidnes
INTERNET-DRAFT SINTEF RUNIT
draft-ietf-cidrd-classless-inaddr-02.txt Geert Jan de Groot
RIPE NCC
Paul Vixie
Internet Software Consortium
November 1996
Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation
1. Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas,
and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as ``work in progress.''
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
``1id-abstracts.txt'' listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East Coast), or
ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
2. Introduction
This document describes a way to do IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation on non-
octet boundaries. The proposed method should thus remove one of the
objections to subnet on non-octet boundaries but perhaps more
significantly, make it possible to assign IP address space in smaller
chunks than 24-bit prefixes, without losing the ability to delegate
authority for the corresponding IN-ADDR.ARPA mappings. The proposed
method is fully compatible with the original DNS lookup mechanisms
specified in [1], i.e. there is no need to modify the lookup
algorithm used, and there should be no need to modify any software
which does DNS lookups either.
The document also discusses some operational considerations to
provide some guidance in implementing this method.
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
3. Motivation
With the proliferation of classless routing technology, it has become
feasible to assign address space on non-octet boundaries. In case of
a Very Small Organization with only a few hosts, assigning a full
24-bit prefix (what has traditionally been referred to as a ``class C
network number'') often leads to inefficient address space
utilization.
One of the problems encountered when assigning a longer prefix (less
address space) is that it seems impossible for such an organization
to maintain its own reverse (``IN-ADDR.ARPA'') zone autonomously. By
use of the reverse delegation method described below, the most
important objection to assignment of longer prefixes to unrelated
organizations can be removed.
Let us assume we have assigned the address spaces to three different
parties as follows:
192.0.2.0/25 to organization A
192.0.2.128/26 to organization B
192.0.2.192/26 to organization C
In the classical approach, this would lead to a single zone like
this:
$ORIGIN 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
;
1 PTR host1.A.domain.
2 PTR host2.A.domain.
3 PTR host3.A.domain.
;
129 PTR host1.B.domain.
130 PTR host2.B.domain.
131 PTR host3.B.domain.
;
193 PTR host1.C.domain.
194 PTR host2.C.domain.
195 PTR host3.C.domain.
The administration of this zone is problematic. Authority for this
zone can only be delegated once, and this usually translates into
``this zone can only be administered by one organization.'' The
other organizations with address space that corresponds to entries in
this zone would thus have to depend on another organization for their
address to name translation. With the proposed method, this
potential problem can be avoided.
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
4. Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation
Since a single zone can only be delegated once we need more points to
do delegation on to solve the problem above. These extra points of
delegation can be introduced by extending the IN-ADDR.ARPA tree
downwards, e.g. by using the first address or the first address and
the network mask length (as shown below) in the corresponding address
space to form the the first component in the name for the zones. For
the problem described in the motivation section, the corresponding
four zone files would look something like this (here shown also with
network masks and network names in the form specified in [2] as
well):
$ORIGIN 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA my-ns.my.domain. hostmaster.my.domain. ( ... )
;...
; <<0-127>> /25
0/25 NS ns.A.domain.
0/25 NS some.other.name.server.
;
1 CNAME 1.0/25.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
2 CNAME 2.0/25.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
3 CNAME 3.0/25.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
;
; <<128-191>> /26
128/26 NS ns.B.domain.
128/26 NS some.other.name.server.too.
;
129 CNAME 129.128/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
130 CNAME 130.128/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
131 CNAME 131.128/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
;
; <<192-255>> /26
192/26 NS ns.C.domain.
192/26 NS some.other.third.name.server.
;
193 CNAME 193.192/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
194 CNAME 194.192/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
195 CNAME 195.192/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
$ORIGIN 0/25.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA ns.A.domain. hostmaster.A.domain. ( ... )
@ NS ns.A.domain.
@ NS some.other.name.server.
@ PTR networkname.A.domain.
@ A 255.255.255.128
;
1 PTR host1.A.domain.
2 PTR host2.A.domain.
3 PTR host3.A.domain.
$ORIGIN 128/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA ns.B.domain. hostmaster.B.domain. ( ... )
@ NS ns.B.domain.
@ NS some.other.name.server.too.
@ PTR networkname.B.domain.
@ A 255.255.255.192
;
129 PTR host1.B.domain.
130 PTR host2.B.domain.
131 PTR host3.B.domain.
$ORIGIN 192/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA ns.C.domain. hostmaster.C.domain. ( ... )
@ NS ns.C.domain.
@ NS some.other.third.name.server.
@ PTR networkname.C.domain.
@ A 255.255.255.192
;
193 PTR host1.C.domain.
194 PTR host2.C.domain.
195 PTR host3.C.domain.
Note that the use of network masks and network names as specified in
[2] is optional, but is strongly recommended.
This approach to splitting up the responsibility for maintaining the
IN-ADDR.ARPA mappings makes it necessary to install approximately 256
CNAME records in the parent zone more or less permanently for each
size-256 chunk split up this way. Some people might view this as
ugly; we will not argue that particular point. It is however quite
easy to automatically generate the CNAME resource records in the
parent zone once and for all, if the way the address space is
partitioned is known.
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
The advantage of this approach over the other proposed approaches for
dealing with this problem is that there should be no need to modify
any already-deployed software. In particular, the lookup mechanism
in the DNS does not have to be modified to accommodate this splitting
of the responsibility for the IPv4 address to name translation on
``non-dot'' boundaries. Furthermore, this technique has been in use
for several years in at least one installation, apparently with no
ill effects.
As usual, a resource record like
$ORIGIN 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
129 CNAME 129.128/26.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
can be convienently abbreviated to
$ORIGIN 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
129 CNAME 129.128/26.2
Note also that it is legal to use slash ('/') in the name of the
resource record (1.0/25.2.0.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA) because these are not
host names; hence the restriction of [3] does not apply here.
5. Operational considerations
5.1 Recommended secondary name service
Some older versions of name server software will make no effort to
find and return the pointed-to name in CNAME records if the pointed-
to name is not already known locally as cached or as authoritative
data. This can cause some confusion in resolvers, as only the CNAME
record will be returned in the response. To avoid this problem it is
recommended that the authoritative name servers for the delegating
zone (the zone containing all the CNAME records) all run as slave
(secondary) name servers for the ``child'' zones delegated and
pointed into via the CNAME records.
5.2 Alternative naming conventions
As a result of this method, the location of the zone containing the
actual PTR records is no longer predefined. This gives flexibility
and some examples will be presented here.
An obvious alternative to using the first address or the first
address and the network mask length in the corresponding address
space to name the new zones is simply to use some other (non-numeric)
name. It is of course also possible to point to an entirely
different part of the DNS tree (e.g. outside of the IN-ADDR.ARPA
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
tree). It would be necessary to use one of these alternate methods
if two organizations somehow shared the same physical subnet (and
corresponding IP address space) with no "neat" alignment of the
addresses, but still wanted to administrate their own IN-ADDR.ARPA
mappings.
The following short example shows how you can point out of the IN-
ADDR.ARPA tree:
$ORIGIN 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA my-ns.my.domain. hostmaster.my.domain. ( ... )
; ...
1 CNAME 1.A.domain.
2 CNAME 2.A.domain.
; ...
129 CNAME 129.B.domain.
130 CNAME 130.B.domain.
;
$ORIGIN A.domain.
@ IN SOA my-ns.A.domain. hostmaster.A.domain. ( ... )
; ...
;
host1 A 192.0.2.1
1 PTR host1
;
host2 A 192.0.2.2
2 PTR host2
;
etc.
Done this way you can actually end up with the name->address and the
(pointed-to) address->name mapping data in the same zone file -- some
may view this as an added bonus as no separate set of secondaries for
the reverse zone is required. Do however note that the traversal via
the IN-ADDR.ARPA tree will still be done, so the CNAME records
inserted there need to point in the right direction for this to work.
An approach as sketched below is an alternative approach using the
same solution:
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
$ORIGIN 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa.
@ IN SOA my-ns.my.domain. hostmaster.my.domain. ( ... )
; ...
1 CNAME 1.2.0.192.in-addr.A.domain.
2 CNAME 2.2.0.192.in-addr.A.domain.
$ORIGIN A.domain.
@ IN SOA my-ns.A.domain. hostmaster.A.domain. ( ... )
; ...
;
host1 A 192.0.2.1
1.2.0.192.in-addr PTR host1
host2 A 192.0.2.2
2.2.0.192.in-addr PTR host2
It is clear that many possibilities exist which can be adapted to the
specific requirements of the situation at hand.
5.3 Other operational issues
Note that one cannot provide CNAME referrals twice for the same
address space, i.e. you cannot allocate a /25 prefix to one
organisation, and run IN-ADDR.ARPA this way, and then have the
organisation subnet the /25 into longer prefixes, and attempt to
employ the same technique to give each subnet control of its own
number space. This would result in a CNAME record pointing to a CNAME
record, which may be less robust overall.
Unfortunately, some old beta releases of the popular DNS name server
implementation BIND 4.9.3 had a bug which caused problems if a CNAME
record was encountered when a reverse lookup was made. The beta
releases involved have since been obsoleted, and this issue is
resolved in the released code. Some software manufacturers have
included the defective beta code in their product. In the few cases
we know of, patches from the manufacturers are available or planned
to replace the obsolete beta code involved.
6. Security Considerations
Security considerations are not discussed in this memo.
7. Conclusion
The suggested scheme gives more flexibility in delegating authority
in the IN-ADDR.ARPA domain, thus making it possible to assign address
space more efficiently without losing the ability to delegate the DNS
authority over the corresponding address to name mappings.
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
8. Acknowledgments
Glen A. Herrmannsfeldt described this trick on comp.protocols.tcp-
ip.domains some time ago. Alan Barrett and Sam Wilson provided
valuable comments on the newsgroup.
We would like to thank Rob Austein, Randy Bush, Matt Crawford, Glen
A. Herrmannsfeldt, Daniel Karrenberg, David Kessens, Tony Li, Paul
Mockapetris, Eric Wassenaar, Michael Patton, and Peter Koch for their
review and constructive comments.
9. References
[1] P. Mockapetris, ``Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities'',
RFC1034, ISI, November 1987.
[2] P. Mockapetris, ``DNS Encoding of Network Names and Other Types'',
RFC1101, ISI, April 1989.
[3] K. Harrenstien, M. Stahl, E. Feinler, ``DoD Internet Host Table
Specification'', RFC952, SRI, October 1985.
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation November 1996
10. Author's Addresses
Havard Eidnes
SINTEF RUNIT
N-7034 Trondheim
Norway
Phone: +47 73 59 44 68
Fax: +47 73 59 17 00
Email: Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no
Geert Jan de Groot
RIPE Network Coordination Centre
Kruislaan 409
1098 SJ Amsterdam
the Netherlands
Phone: +31 20 592 5065
Fax: +31 20 592 5090
Email: GeertJan.deGroot@ripe.net
Paul Vixie
Internet Software Consortium
Star Route Box 159A
Woodside, CA 94062
USA
Phone: +1 415 747 0204
Email: paul@vix.com
Eidnes, de Groot, Vixie Expires 970525 [Page 9]
