home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- .Part 4 - VHF and UHF Antennas:
-
- The spectrum above 50 MHz has special significance to the development
- of antennas and antenna arrays. This is the frequency range where you can
- build a really high gain antenna without owning a large piece of real estate.
- It is also the region where antennas can be tested easily in preparation for
- scaling them to the HF region. At the upper end of our frequency spectrum the
- antennas are more aking to optics. I'll divide this segment of the spectrum
- into two parts, the VHF and UHF regions.
-
- The two major types of antennas used in the VHF spectrum (50 to 225
- MHz) are the collinear array and the Yagi structure. The collinear array
- usually consists of a group of 1/2 wavelength dipoles in front of a screen or
- set of half wave reflectors. In the later case, it technically could be
- called an array of two element Yagis. The unique thing about the collinear is
- the simplicity of the feed system which usually is an open wire line. The
- collinear is usually quite broadband, unlike most high gain antennas, and
- efficiency and gain can be quite high. The extended expanded collinear is a
- stretched out version that has less elements and was described in an article I
- wrote in Dec. '74 QST. Both the conventional and the extended expanded
- collinears were widely used in the days before good Yagi designs were
- available and are still in use by some 144 and 432 EME operators. This type
- of antenna has two main drawbacks: 1. It is large and hence it can be large
- enough, an expression the late Sam Harris, ex W1FZJ, used to use for antenna
- that couldn't stay up under adverse weather and 2. Its size usually prevents
- mounting other antennas on the same mast.
-
- The workhorse in the VHF spectrum is truly the Yagi antenna. The first
- high gain VHF Yagi designs were published by Carl Greenblum (QST, Aug/Sept.
- '56), J. Kmosko, W2NLY and H. Johnson, W6QKI (QST, Jan. '56) and Dr. Hermann
- Ehrenspeck and H. Poehler (IEEE, PGAP, Oct. '59, pp 379-386). Unfortunately,
- these Yagis weren't always as good as claimed and had only fair cleanliness in
- the side lobe and front-to-back ratio. In Jan. '72 (QST pg 96 and March pg 101
- corrections), Don Hilliard, W0EYE, now W0PW, published his 4.2 wavelength 15
- element Yagi based on the unpublished works of Peter Biezbicke at NBS. Don and
- I urged Pete to publish his work and he finally did so in Dec. '77 in NBS
- Technical Note #688, now out of print. This publication was the result of
- extensive studies done by the NBS in the 1950's to develop high gain arrays
- for ionospheric scatter and included models with boomlengths of 0.4 to 4.2
- wavelengths plus new information on scaling and boom corrections. In August
- 1977 "Ham Radio" I published a full length article on the NBS report including
- all the necessary details to build your own Yagis and sketched several models
- for 50 thru 432 MHz. There are some errors in the NBS publication which are
- corrected in my article. Not correct was the gain of the 2 element Yagi which
- should be approximately 5.0 dBd, not 2.6 as reported by NBS (they must have
- had some measurement errors). The NBS Yagis are not the only Yagi designs
- available but they are easily duplicated and near the maximum gain attainable
- for the appropriate boom lengths. They have excellent patterns and are easily
- stacked for additional gain.
-
- One more point in passing. The trigonal reflector system in NBS 688
- definitely is no good on the 3.2 wavelength and shorter booms. It actually
- reduces gain by up to 1.5 dB! By lengthening all three elements in this
- reflector system, I have been able to recover all the gain but no real gain
- improvement over a single reflector. I have not tested the trigonal reflector
- on the 4.2 wavelength designs.
-
- In Feb. 1978 QST, Wayne Overbeck, N6NB, published an antenna he named
- the Quagi. It is basically a Yagi using a quad driven element and reflector.
- It is low in cost using a wooden boom and fed directly with coax cable. DL9KR
- and others have done further optimization on the Quagi and have used arrays of
- 16 to do 432 MHz EME. This design could still use some optimization in gain
- and only a limited number of designs are available.
-
- Other versions of the Yagi have also been used including the log-
- periodic fed Yagi developed by the late Oliver Swan and now manufactured by
- KLM (See Ham Radio, Jan '76, pg 46). The log periodic antenna discussed
- earlier in this talk has never found much favor with amateurs since there is
- no need for the bandwidth and it has less gain than a well designed Yagi.
- Along these lines, we can now make high gain Yagis with clean patterns using
- the NBS designs. These antennas seem to stack well in larger arrays yielding
- the 20 plus dBs required for 144 and 220 MHz EME. One EMEer, Dave Olean,
- K1WHS, is using an array of 24 of the 2.2 wavelength NBS type Yagis stacked 8
- feet apart for EME and he has worked stations all over the world who are only
- using single Yagis and moderate power.
-
- Most recently, with the help of a large computer, a special program
- and a local person interested in the design of VHF antennas, we were able to
- develop a very unique Yagi, an 8 element one on a 12 foot boom for 144 MHz
- that had extremely high gain (greater than 11.5 dBd true gain) with excellent
- pattern (all lobes down 20 dB). It worked so well that I made 8 copies and
- first tested them on a 144 MHz EME DXpedition to Rhose Island where 25
- stations were worked off the Moon in two nights of operation. Computers will
- undoubtedly be useful in the future as this work continues.
-
- UHF:
-
- The 420 MHz and up area is in a transisition region. Long Yagi
- antennas can be made with high gain such as the NBS and Guenter Hoch, DL6WU,
- types. The later designs are an extension of the Greenblum designs mentioned
- earlier and can be designed up to 20 wavelengths (see VHF Communications, #3
- and #4, 1977, and #3, 1982). These designs show an increasing gain of
- approximately 2.2 dB for every doubling of the boom length which is about the
- maximum so far reported. Indeed I built a 9.25 wavelength (21 foot) 432 MHz
- Yagi using this design material and achieved a verified gain of almost 17 dBd
- at the 1981 Central States VHF Conference in Sioux Falls, SD.
-
- Long backfire ("A New Method For Obtaining Maximum Gain from Yagi
- Antennas", IEEE, PGAP, Vol 7, Oct. '59) antennas have been tried by the EMEers
- but gains have failed to live up to claims. The short backfire ("The Short-
- Backfire Antenna", H. W. Ehrenspeck, Proc IEEE, Vol 53, Aug '65) has been
- duplicated by myself and others and gains of approximately 15 dBi have been
- achieved. Perhaps more work should be done in this area as an array of short
- backfire antennas has the potential of higher gain without the problems of the
- surface tolerances on the parabolic reflector.
-
- Loop Yagi: Another popular UHF antenna is the loop Yagi developed in
- 1974 by Mike Walters, G3JVL (Radio Communications, RSGB, Jan '75 and Sept '78).
- Although it looks like a quad, it is distinctly different in that it uses
- wide but thin metal scraps for elements. Mike started out with wires but could
- never achieve high gains (like discussed earlier on quads). He recons that the
- wide but thin strap improves bandwidth and hence gain. The loops are bolted
- directly to a metallic boom thus solving the mechanical problems of mounting
- elements at UHF. It is a very practical antenna for 902 MHz and above and has
- worked well for me on 902, 1296 and 2304 MHz. G3JVL has even designed and
- tested to specifications a 10 GHz model. The principle designs use 26, 38 and
- 45 elements. The gain on the 45 element model (which is 16 wavelengths long)
- is 21 dBi! G3JVL has also published correction factors so that the loop width
- thickness and boom size can be scaled.
-
- Dishes: There is something esoteric about the parabolic dish antenna.
- It just has to work but the typical dish only has a 55% efficiency at best.
- Furthermore, it has a large wind surface. Therefore, it is not too popular
- except at frequencies where loop Yagis are no longer economical and for EME
- where it can often be mounted close to the ground. More on this subject later.
-
-
- High Performance Arrays: I'd now like to turn to the subject of high
- performance arrays and more specifically EME (Earth-Moon-Earth) antennas. EME
- affords a unique property, viz. that due to the approximately 2-1/2 seconds it
- takes a radio wave to traverse the 450,000 mile path to the Moon and back, the
- EMEer can make improvements to his antenna system and actually hear the
- difference by listening for his own echos. Furthermore, EME antennas have such
- high gain (typically greater that 20 dBi) that you can listen to the noise
- generated by the sun to measure beamwidth, patterns and hence determine actual
- antenna gain (see "Requirements and Recommendations for 70-cm EME", J.
- Reisert, W1JR, Ham Radio, June '82) as well as system noise figure.
-
- Large Yagi arrays are becoming increasingly popular especially for
- EME. WB0TEM has 24 5.75 wavelength 19 element Yagis on 432 while K1WHS has 24
- 14 element 2.2 wavelength Yagis on 144 MHz. Both stations have big signals and
- are able to work small (1 or 2 Yagi) stations off the Moon.
-
- However, the really big EME stations use parabolic dishes up to 40
- feet in diameter! The advantages of a dish for EME operation are numberous
- despite the low (55%) efficiency (some commercial antenna manufacturers have
- claimed up to 80% efficiency but use cassegranian feed systems that are quite
- complex). First off, the feed system can be changed to permit multiband EME.
- Circular polarization is also possible by using dual dipole feeds or the W2IMU
- multimode horn. Dish type antennas are usually much quieter on reception
- because of low side lobes and hence are very desireable with the low sky
- temperatures experienced on 432 MHz and above. On 432 MHz where linear
- polarization is still predominant, the most efficient dishes are using the EIA
- symmetrical "E" and "H" plans and works well with a dish with a 0.45 to 0.5 F/
- D ratio. VE7BBG has such a feed with a W2IMU horn built into the center and
- has made cross band (23 to 70 cm) EME QSO's. A single dipole in front of a
- splasher plate is definitely not recommended due to its unequal "E" and "H"
- beamwidths! We still have a long way to go to improve efficiency and the
- offset parabola recently introduced to EMEers by W2IMU from Bell Labs has
- considerable advantages if the construction can become feasible for amateurs.
-
- Summary: The VHF/UHF frequency region is a good test bed for
- developing and improving antennas. Recent developments in the Yagi and loop
- Yagi have greatly advanced the state of the art in VHF/UHF communications.
- Antenna patterns have improved and hence the noise temperature of the antennas
- used is now more compatible with the state of the art preamplifiers. The NBS
- Yagi data now gives everyone interested a recipe for a suitable antenna
- without guesswork. EME antennas have taken a big leap forward in performance
- and made EME operation almost commonplace. We still need to do more work in
- the area of low loss feed systems especially for Yagi arrays.
-
- (End of Part 4)
-