Groovy Bytes: Behind the Moon/groovybytes.iso/GROOVY/MISC/DIGITALU/DIG_AL06.ZIP/UFO.TXT

Text File | 1995-04-11 | 31.8 KB | 780 lines

A-albionic Research Weekly Up-date of 4-9-95
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The following copyrighted article is re-printed with permission from the
Winter, 1980-81 _Conspiracy Digest_, PO Box 766 Dearborn, Michigan 48121.

The article may be forwarded without limit in cyberspace as long as it is
not altered in any way.  References to A-albionic Research, _Conspiracy
Digest_, Peter Kor, and _Kor's Kosmos_ must not be removed when it is
forwarded.  The closing signature from James Daugherty, the Internet
Postmaster of A-albionic Research, must not be removed.  Nothing but the
name and address (snail, e-mail, and www) of an additional forwarder can
be added.  Discussion and analysis may not be added.  Discuss this article
in separate posts and documents only!  This article may not be published
other than as specified herein without the expressed permission of Peter
Kor c/o 1207 Cordova Road, Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124
==========================================================================
  IS THERE A PLOT TO PROMOTE THE SAUCERS?

                 Peter Kor
         Copyright C Peter Kor 1977

(This is an edited version of an article that
was originally published in the Winter 1977
SEARCH.)

A PRINCIPAL article of faith of most
saucer researchers is that the government
has been engaged in a massive coverup.
Opinions vary about what is being covered
up. Some believe that certain agents of
the government have known for a long time
that the saucers come from outer space.
Others think that government authorities do
not have the complete answer and are
frantically trying to solve the mystery
before the Russians do.
     Whatever version is espoused, all of the
conspiracy theories have one element in
common. All assume that some real alien
power is at work in the world and that the
purpose of government efforts is to prevent
that truth from becoming known.
     There is another, much more profound
possibility, however. The government may
be covering up the fact that there is nothing
to cover up! Rather than trying to hide a
profound truth, certain quasi-government
groups may be trying to convince people
that there is a profound truth to hide. In
short, researchers must consider the pos-
sibility that much of the saucer mystery and
movement has been created and controlled
by the very people who have been accused
of suppressing them.
     To fully appreciate this new possibility,
researchers must be willing to rethink the
basics of their present view about saucer
conspiracy. The evidence usually cited to
support that view includes the following:
     1. The air force and other government
agencies reacted suspiciously from the
beginning, publically down-playing saucer
sightings, while carrying on a serious
investigation in secret.
     2. Factions within the air force probe
that took the saucers seriously and tended
to believe in the extraterrestrial hypothesis
where suppressed. Only negative findings
and conventional explanations were given
out for public consumption.
     3. Many saucer reports were classified,
indicating that there were facts that the air
force wanted hidden.
     4. Many so-called solutions to key
saucer cases were patently absurd.
     5. Certain photos and other materials
allegedly related to saucer encounters were
"confiscated" and never returned to their
owners. What other reason could there be
for this behavior except to suppress proof
that the saucers are real?
     6. Many researchers have been
threatened by mysterious "men in black",
indicating that the government is trying to
plug the leaks that develop in their security
net.
     7. Air force denials just do not hold up
against the innumerable dramatic reports of
strange objects and alien beings coming in
from all over the world.
     8. Recent disclosures show that the
CIA and, perhaps, other super-secret
government agencies have been in on the
saucer probe since the beginning. Why
would such top security people get into the
act unless they were (and are) trying to
suppress an incredible secret?
     Much of this evidence is hearsay.
Some of it can be explained on grounds
other than conspiracy. But there is a
portion of the evidence that supports a
conspiracy theory that is radically different
from the traditional view. Here is a point
by point analysis.
     EARLY SECRECY: Yes, the early air
force PR was defensive and the real
investigation did go underground. But there
were simple and obvious reasons for this
behavior. The saucers burst onto the scene
without warning. Within a few months
people all over the country were reporting
strange, elusive objects. There was a
genuine fear that the U.S. might be coming
under some kind of attack, launched either
from another country or planet. That the
government would be secretive until it
studied the possibilities is understandable.
     As the initial fears waned, others
developed. While no evidence was found
that the saucers were hostile, they still
resisted definitive analysis. Since the name
of the government game is CONTROL,
authorities were genuinely incensed that
something could be going on above and
around them that was not subject to their
power. Thus, subsequent efforts were
undoubtedly devoted to bringing the situa-
tion under control. Researchers believe
that this control involved discovering and
suppressing the truth that flying saucers
were from another planet. But it could have
involved encouraging, consolidating, and
using the movement that saucer "exper-
iences" were producing.

     OPINION SUPPRESSION: The interest-
ing aspect of the alleged fight within the air
force between skeptics and believers is not
that such a fight may actually have taken
place, out that knowledge of the claimed
dispute reached the public so easily. If
there was a bona fide move to suppress
positive views, it wasn't very effective.
Such views were leaked continually to
saucer savants via quasi-official contacts
such, as Major Donald Keyhoe. The result of
the leaks was the appearance of a cover-up
in which some of those who supposedly knew
the truth wanted the truth revealed, while
others wanted the truth suppressed.
     The question is: Why weren't the leaks
plugged? Why were people like Donald
Keyhoe, Frank Edwards, and Ed Ruppelt
given information that supposedly conflicted
with the official line and allowed to publish
it far and wide?
     REPORT CLASSIFICATION: There are
several non-conspiratorial reasons why the
air force (or other government agencies)
would have classified certain saucer reports
as secrets. Here are three. First, the most
important early cases would have been
classified merely as a precaution until the
nature of the problem was determined.
Second, some subsequent cases would have
been suppressed so that secret developments
in military hardware and intelligence
technology would not be revealed. Third,
other cases would likely have been classified
to prevent certain key contacts and infor-
mation networks from becoming known.
      Knowing the government's (and es-
pecially the military's) proclivity for
secrecy, the classification process almost
certainly was abused. Once again, however,
the incredible aspect of such secrecy is not
that there was so much of it, but that it was
breached so often. Donald Keyhoe was
constantly receiving "classified" reports as
the main exhibits for his many books. The
organization he headed for so many years,
NICAP, was permeated with military,
intelligence, and political leaders (retired
and otherwise) who managed to kick loose
enough exciting information to keep the
saucer "ball" rolling. There is even some
evidence that dramatic cases (such as UFOs
"swallowing" air force planes) were planted
for publication, only to be denied later. The
stories and the denials worked together to
create the impression that the government
was trying valiantly to cover up something
incredible.
  The question that now must be asked is:
Were Donald Keyhoe, Frank Edwards, et al;
really courageous heroes fighting to uncover
a hidden truth -- or unwitting dupes, man-
ipulated into helping to create a popular
movement for unknown purposes?
  ABSURD SOLUTIONS: Many air force
solutions to key saucer cases were absurd
because the original reports were absurd.
An analyst cannot be faulted for offering
highly speculative explanations for in-
credible or nebulous reports that had little
or nothing to back them up.
  But, beyond this consideration, there
WERE cases where the answers arrived at
simply did not satisfy the main features of
the reports being analyzed. Enthusiasts see
such instances as obvious examples of a
coverup. But such a view is self-refuting.
To wit: If the explanations were
OBVIOUSLY insufficient, why were they
offered in the first place?
  Such "explanations" could have been
outright blunders. Or, they could have been
further attempts to convince believers -- and
the public at large -- that the answer to the
saucer mystery was being hidden at all
costs.
  EVIDENCE CONFISCATION: Much has
been made of photographs (such as the
Ralph Mayher film) and other so-called
"hard" saucer evidence that was supposedly
acquired and analyzed by government
personnel and never returned. Assuming,
for the sale of argument, that such incidents
occurred as reported, what do they prove?
Certainly, the blob of light that showed up
on Ralph Mayer's film could not be
construed as proof that flying saucers
originate from another planet!
  How, then, can the reports of confis-
cation be explained? There are several
possibilities. First, such materials might
have been truly lost in the maze of bureau-
cratic red tape that characterizes all gov-
ernment agencies and departments. Second,
some of those who supposedly produced or
found the materials might have lied about
their encounter and/or about the role al-
legedly played by the government.  Then,
when government officials denied receiving
or keeping the materials, researchers
naturally sided with the accusers. In such
cases, the presumption of a coverup would
have been used to "prove" that saucer evi-
dence was being covered up! Third, certain
materials might actually have been confis-
cated -- not to hide a secret truth, but to
prevent knowledge about secret hardware,
etc., from becoming public.
     There is another, more radical
possibility. Unknown to the air force, a
clandestine organization might have been
implicated in either staging or lending false
credence to certain key saucer incidents. In
some cases, the saucer "evidence" would
have been confiscated, stolen, or secured
for "analysis" and conveniently lost to hide
the group's complicity.
     "SHUT-UP" CASES: The truth about
people who claim they were shut up is that
their reported "research" and/or "exper-
iences" hardly justified being singled out for
coercive tactics. And those researchers
who later talked despite their harrowing
shut-up encounters (ala Albert Bender) were
found not to be in possession of decisive
saucer evidence or information in the first
place. Furthermore, mere threats would
hardly be the way to "take care" of people
who were really in a position to blow the lid
off of the most incredible secretl of the
century.
     Therefore -- to the extent that the so-
called men-in-black stories represent real
happenings -- the more reasonable assump-
tion is that the purpose of the shut-ups was
to CREATE THE IMPRESSION of suppres-
sion, rather than to actually suppress vital
information.
     Some readers might take issues with
this analysis on the grounds that the truly
successful shut-up cases would be precisely
those that we haven't heard about. Thus,
they will argue, conclusions about such
cases cannot be made solely on the basis of
what is known.
     The error in logic in this argument is
subtle, but decisive. To wit: Possibilities
cannot take precedence over actualities
What is not known is not evidence. To use
the unknown as a trump card in analysis is
merely to assume what must be proved. So
an estimate of the shut-up cases must be
based upon available facts and claims, and
neither justifies the conclusion that actual
suppression of vital information was
involved.
     REPORT ACCUMULATION: At first
glance, official denials and explanations do
seem quite fragile when compared to the
many thousands of saucer reports that have
been recorded over the years. Buy what is
always conveniently overlooked is that
NONE of those thousands of reports has
produced decisive evidence for the exist-
ence of what is reported! So what appear at
first glance to be obvious attempts to hide
the truth about the saucers, turn out, after
analysis, to be quite in accordance with
available facts.
     Of course, researchers will claim that
proof has not been obtained because the
alleged conspirators have successfully
suppressed it. But this argument is self-
refuting. If the proof has been successfully
hidden, on what basis do researchers claim
to KNOW that it exists?
     The truth is that a saucer secret such
as researchers imagine could not be
suppressed for very long. No group of
conspirators could keep on top of the
tremendous activity implied by the saucer
reports. Thus, there is nothing to prevent
proof from being secured and revealed as
the result of any one of the many
encounters that supposedly occur every day.
Yet, such proof has never been obtained.
     CIA INVOLVEMENT: The revelation
that the CIA and, perhaps, other govern-
ment agencies have been involved In the
saucer probe is not surprising. What is
surprising is that researchers have been so
slow to recognize the possible implications
of the information. Contrary to what
researchers believe, CIA involvement does
not prove the existence of a high-level
cover-up of a saucer secret -- only a high--
level interest in flying saucers.
     The mission of quasi-official organiza-
tion such as the ICA is two-fold. First, to
secure and analyze pertinent information
for intelligence purposes. And, second, to
plan, and execute covert intelligence opera-
tion.  The reasoning of researchers has
been preoccupied with the first of these
missions. They believe that the threat
posed by the saucers was grave enough to
get the highest levels of government into
the act. The challenge supposedly given to
the CIA was to find the truth. And when it
was discovered that alien powers were
involved, the agency's mission shifted to
covering-up the truth.
     This view of the situation presumes
that flying saucers exist. As it becomes
more and more clear that this presumption
is false, researchers will be faced with
having to account for the great commotion
that has been created over virtually nothing.
Then, perhaps a few thinkers among them
will consider the possibility that the purpose
of the ClA-type involvement was not to
suppress interest in flying saucers, but TO
PROMOTE AND REGIMENT IT!
     In the meantime, I will ask the relevant
questions:
     * Is the saucer mystery mostly the
result of a covert operation?
     * Was the famed government coverup
a trick to generate support for the saucer
cause on the basis of opposition to what was
thought to be official policy?
     * Were certain well-known cases
invented or staged -- using props, hypnosis,
and/or psycho-chemicals -- to add substance
to the saucer myth and to trigger further
"experiences"?
     * Have quasi-official agents infil-
trated so-called saucer research?
     * Are certain saucer personalities and
groups being financed, knowingly or other-
wise, by silent partners?
     Does the influx of credentialed
scientists and other "recognized authorities"
into saucer "research" represent an effort to
take direct control of the saucer movement
and to channel its ideas and activities into
preferred directions?
     * Is the recent media blitz about
UFOs and related "phenomena" a calculated
attempt to transfer "saucerphobia" from a
small band of programmed zealots to the
public at large?
     By single-mindedly preaching their
message of alien visitation and government
suppression, saucer researchers may be
unwittingly playing a part they hadn't
bargained for and don't -- even suspect -- a
part dictated by the very people they think
they are opposing.
     What would be the purpose of such
manipulation? Why would the powers that
be want to create an army of believers
marching on behalf of alien visitors? One
possibility is that the myth of flying saucers
is being used as a form of psychological
warfare. The question is: WHO is the
enemy?


Part 2 - Understanding the New Theory
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THE PUBLICATION of the preceding article
created quite a stir. Most researchers were
defensive, but a significant few set out to
seriously consider the possibility of a PRO-
saucer conspiracy. The driving force behind
such consideration is the realization that
the root facts of the saucer situation and
the cover-up explanation are more consis-
tent with the plot to promote the saucers.
From now on, serious researchers will have
to consider the possibility that their efforts
are being subtly prompted and directed by
people who are trying to keep the saucer
mystery alive for their own secret purposes.
     In response to those researchers and
other interested parties who have asked for
more coverage of this subject, I offer the
following observations about the how, who,
and why of such a conspiracy. When reading
this material bear in mind that my present
purpose is NOT to make a case for a pro-
saucer conspiracy, but to produce a
conspiracy THEORY that is in accordance
with the basic saucer facts and can be
evaluated in the light of future events.
     HOW? I have not said, nor do I mean to
imply, that the entire saucer saga has been
created from scratch. Far from it. The
initial reports posed a genuine mystery to
government officials and intelligence
experts. The earliest air force investigation
was a genuine attempt to find the answer
while, at the same time, keeping the lid on
key incidents. But early in the game, events
and analysis showed that the elusive discs
were not weapons directed by a foreign
power or space ships sent by beings from
another planet. At some point, the "flying
saucers" -- and the popular movement
"they" had generated -- were reconsidered
in a new light. this "new light" concerned
promoting and manipulating the saucer
mystery, rather than opposing it.
     Since the group doing the reconsidering
was not the group doing the investigating,
the two programs proceeded concurrently.
And although the latter, official group did
not know about the former, covert group,
the covert group knew about, infiltrated,
and used the official group.
     Means used by the covert group to
sustain the saucer mystery and movement
could have included: 1. Encouraging interest
in the subject through &rect agent
participation and the indirect financing
(through intermediaries) of certain saucer
organization, publications, and researchers.
2. Fostering the idea of a coverup through
intentional leaks concerning "secret"
reports, investigations, and conclusions. 3.
Creating saucer hysteria by inventing
incidents, playing-up reports from the
public, and even staging dramatic saucer
encounters.
     This scenario does not call for
thousands of conspirators running around the
country creating thousands of saucer
incidents and otherwise masterminding the
situation at every turn. To the contrary,
very little direct intervention would be
necessary. All that would be required would
be the problem and/or staging of key saucer
claims and encounters. The ubiquitous
network of saucer enthusiasts would do the
rest: Investigations would be conducted,
reports published, rumors circulated, and
calls for official candor made.
     A few invented or staged encounters
would not only trigger a new round of
interest but would produce new "incidents"
as well This "contagion effect" would
increase the impact of the few interventions
far beyond the significance of the
interventions, themselves. Thus, the total
saucer situation might be composed of, say,
2% intervention and 98% contagious
commotion in the form of concretized
fantasies and other types of "psychic"
experiences, imaginative misinterpretations,
and outright hoaxes.
     The induced hysteria envisioned is not
hypothetical. The general population of any
society contains a significant proportion of
disturbed and suggestible individuals who
will respond to certain ideological stimuli in
a predictable way. The triggering of such
individuals can be accomplished remotely.
     If researchers dig deep enough, they
will find indications of covert intervention.
Rather than identify specific incidents, I
will point to certain general subject areas
that deserve further scrutiny. These include
the "leaking' of alleged top-secret reports
in the early-to-late 1950s; the formation
and organization (NICAP) in the mid-1950s;
the early contact reports in the early-to-
mid 1950s; the "abduction contagion" of the
1970s and the resurrection of the crashed-
saucer stories in the late 1970s.
     When inquiring into these matters,
researchers should try to get answers to the
following questions
     * Who were the first or most impor-
tant sources for the claims involved?
     * What are the backgrounds and
connections of these people?
     *   Who aids them in publicizing their
claims?
     More specifically, researchers should
look for ufologists who have secret
informants or have backgrounds that include
work experience in intelligence agendas or
the military. Especially significant is the
"mentor phenomenon" in which researchers
and, sometimes, contactees receive ideas,
guidance, and encouragement from in-
dividuals who operate on the periphery of,
or behind, the saucer scene. There are at
least a few cases in which such mentors
have "turned on" certain enthusiasts who
went on to have a great impact on the
saucer field. Also important is the fin-
ancing of specific individuals, groups, and
projects. Who is receiving financing from
outside the field? Who supplies such money
and why?
     Ufologists are especially susceptible to
covert manipulation. For although they
continually denounce what they think is
official secrecy, they will jump at the
chance to establish secret communication
links with apparently-official sources. Their
zeal in this regard prohibits them from
asking the crucial questions. To wit: Why
has the secret "contact" picked the par-
ticular researcher for leaking information
What motive other than getting the truth
out might the "contact" have? And who
other than the government or intelligence
agency might the "contact" be working for?
     WHO? If a pro-saucer conspiracy IS
perpetuating the saucer mystery, it does not
originate in the government or intelligence
agencies per se. The saucer saga spans too
many different administrations and the
nature of the effort is too subtle and far-
reaching to support such a theory. It must
be the project of a powerful private group
that has an on-going liaison with -- or even
agents in -- various government departments
and services. Thus, the role and purpose
the group would be filtered through and
distorted by intermediaries.
    The independence of intelligence agents
is well known. They do not restrict them-
selves to carrying out the official project
of their superiors, but do "free-lance" work
as well. The presence of such agents in the
government and in the "field" would be
vital aspect of a conspiracy network. They
would act as links between the prime
movers of the plot and "fellow travelers"
within saucer research who are open to
contact or collaboration. In most cases,
these agents would not know the real
purposes behind the "services" they have
contracted to perform.
     The prime movers of such a conspiracy
would not be directly interested in flying
saucers or similar subjects. Their efforts
would be purely pragmatic. The achieve-
ment of their objectives would require that
they deal with various fringe groups.
     WHY?  To fully appreciate the purpose
of such a conspiracy, researchers must think
beyond the unproven assumption that flying
saucers and the saucer movement are
important IN-THEMSELVES. They must
consider the possibility that their cherished
subject is merely a means to a greater end
that has nothing to do with extraterrestrial
or inter-dimensional visitors -- that they are
unknowingly participating in a psycho-social
experiment, not engaging in original
frontiers research.
    I know this suggestion will repel most
ufologists. They have spent so much time
and effort chasing the saucers that they
almost HAVE TO BELIEVE that their pursuit
is vital to human knowledge and
understanding. The idea that their entire
quest has been predicated on a deliberately
fostered illusion will seem impossible to
most of them.
    The previously-best estimate of what
might be going on as Leon Davidson's
suggestion in the 1950s that the CIA was
using saucer reports and investigations as a
psychological warfare weapon against the
Russians. Material released under the
freedom-of-information act documents the
ClA's concern about how saucer reports
would affect the population of the U.S.,
especially during a crisis such as a Russian
attack. There are indications that the CIA
might have eventually tried to turn the
saucer reports to its own advantage by
making the Russians consider the possibility
that the U.S. had a new technology or was
about to gain such a technology from
contact with extraterrestrials.
    But if such a plan existed, it was short-
lived because the Russians had the means to
establish the facts about the situation
independent of CIA machinations. Most
likely, there was no such plan. The alleged
concern over and plan for using the saucers
in psychological warfare were probably
misdirection ploys designed to account for a
CIA interest that might otherwise be traced
to sinister sources beyond the CIA.
    What might such sinister sources be up
to? The saucer mystery and movement bear
all the earmarks of an exercise in social
control -- directed at Americans, not
Russians! Such an exercise would be merely
one part of a larger on-going program
designed to shape social attitudes and
responses for the purpose of mobilizing and
channeling public opinion.
    The basic modus operandi of the
program would be ideological. By creating
and/or encouraging certain beliefs and
expectations, specific public responses could
be triggered remotely under certain condi-
tions.
     The overall program would deal directly
with public attitudes and ideas concerning
social, economic, and foreign policy issues.
The portion of the program dealing with
fringe movements in general, and flying
saucer "research" in particular, would be
predicated on the "need" of covert authori-
ties to contain the ideas and actions of "its"
citizens.
     A certain percentage of people in any
society will not be satisfied with conven-
tional ideas and pursuits and will, inevitably,
seek out and develop off-beat ideas and
movements. Left to themselves, such
people might become a potent anti-social or
anti-establishment force. The way to
handle such an on-going possibility is NOT
to stifle such movements. That would only
intensify the concern of its participants.
Instead, such movements would be
encouraged and controlled by containing and
shaping the basic ideas containing and
shaping the basic ideas and beliefs involved.
They would also serve as testing grounds for
developing, testing, and using new belief
systems,
     The short-term objectives of such an
effort would vary, depending on the
character of the movement and the desires
of the covert authorities at the time. To
illustrate how such short-term changes
might be made and why, consider this
partly-hypothetical synopsis of the saucer
saga. For most of the 33-year saga, the
reigning belief was that the saucers were
Visitors from other planets. Because
enthusiasts were preoccupied with the
means and purposes of the "visitors", they
overlooked the ideological aspects of the
belief -- aspects which reinforced the
prevailing ideas about reality, society, and
authority. To wit: The "visitors" were 3-D
humanoids traveling through space in
advanced vehicles; they had their own
government-like confederation; and, most
important, proof of the nature and purpose
of the aliens was possessed only by
CERTIFIED authorities.
     The 1970s saw a drastic change in
saucer beliefs. Researchers began to
explore the possibilities of what seemed to
be increasingly bizarre saucer encounters.
Travelers from other dimensions, archetypes
from the collective unconscious, and trans-
formations of consciousness became the
orders of the day.
     The ideas spawned by this stage of the
saucer saga were decidedly anti-establish-
ment and anti-authoritarian in orientation.
Eventually, the conspirators feared that
they were losing control of the beliefs and
events that defined and directed the saucer
movement. An ideological pullback was
necessary. That pullback came In the form
of a resurrection of the crashed-saucer
stories. By creating the appearance that
"officials" were finally going to release
details about crashed saucers and their
occupants, the focus of attention and the
thinking of researchers were shifted back to
the conventional ideology implicit in the
extraterrestrial explanation.
     The re-introduction of the crashed-
saucer stories was predictable, and lends
support to the pro-conspiracy theory. Now,
the crucial questions to be answered are:
Which ufologists are promoting the crashed-
saucer stories? Who is feeding them infor-
mation? And what dramatic conclusion Is
the crashed-saucer caper building toward?
     When researchers accepted the exis-
tence of flying saucers WITHOUT PROOF,
they set themselves up for possible
ideological control. To counteract this
possibility, a new dimension of saucer
inquiry is necessary. That dimension should
include a study of the ideological context
and implications of the saucer belief
system, as well as of the social context and
implications of the saucer movement.

Copyright C 1980 by Peter Kor Reprinted
from Kor's Kosmos c/o 1207 Cordova Rd
Mayfield Hts, Ohio 44124. Subscriptions
restricted to advanced borderlands
intellectuals.

posted for discussion by:

\\\\\<http://msen.com/~jhdaugh/>\\\\*////////<[e-mail]>//////////
James Daugherty, volunteer Postmaster for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum.  Quarterly journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\*///////////////////////////////////////
**E-Mail Update/Discussion/Archive**|*******World Wide Web/Gopher/FTP*******
 e-mail: [e-mail]    |        <http://a-albionic.com/>
message: info prj                   |      <gopher.a-albionic.com 9006>
         get prj gopher/keytogopher |           <ftp.a-albionic.com>
////////////////////////////////////*\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\