home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.ee.pdx.edu
/
2014.02.ftp.ee.pdx.edu.tar
/
ftp.ee.pdx.edu
/
pub
/
mst3k
/
misties
/
Death_of_Usenet
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-05-04
|
7KB
|
233 lines
The following is my first attempt at MiSTing a usenet posting.
It's relatively short and not nearly as hideous as many that
have been MiSTed here, but I submit it for your consideration.
Since it is so short, I didn't attach opening and closing
skits. Besides, I only have one invention exchange in mind,
and I don't want to blow it so quickly.
All comments, whether good or bad, public or private,
floating or not floating, etc, are welcome.
Enjoy.
--------------
Subject: Death of Usenet?
References: <berlinerD1uMnK.7Ko@netcom.com>
In article <berlinerD1uMnK.7Ko@netcom.com>, berliner@netcom.com (Guy
Berliner) wrote:
TOM: Ich bin ein Berliner.
> This is an addendum to a longer essay I wrote
CROW: That The Mad's couldn't find! Wooohoo.
> entitled "Myths About
> Usenet."
MIKE: That's "Mizz about usenet", thank you.
> Both are right now at Netcom's ultra slow, ultra crowded
> ftp server (ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/be/berliner/Myths_About_Usenet.html)
TOM: The holidays are over, people. Go back to the mall!
> Will We Witness the Death Of Usenet?
MIKE: I think that would send us over-budget.
TOM: Yeah, can't you just do a voice-over of some stock footage
or something?
> Usenet is nearly a modern miracle.
MIKE: jeeez, it's not even as good as mayonnaise?
> Millions of people have access
> to it in one form or another,
CROW: Until I have to itemize, I'll use the Usenet-EZ
> and hundreds of thousands actively
> read and contribute.
TOM: [shaking] Do your part. Read something!
> They can carry on discussion and debate
> with people across the world in a printed forum with worldwide
> distribution.
CROW: But instead they just lurk in the binaries groups.
MIKE: Hey, just try to debate with people across the world
with only local distribution.
> Yet most pay little or nothing to do so, aside from
> a flat monthly access fee to a service provider.
MIKE: It's not flat, it's pectorally challenged!
> It started as a
> completely voluntary effort started by pioneers in computer
> networking, mainly as a way to serve the needs of computer
> specialists to share up-to-date technical information.
TOM: So this was when it started, I'm guessing.
CROW: And it worked so much better than the You-Must-Use-Net,
which was mandatory.
TOM: I heard some people used it to share really out-of-date
technical information and got flamed out of existance.
> It has grown
> to include people with a wide range of interests, and newsgroups
> covering an astounding galaxy of subjects.
MIKE: Milk, it does a Usenet good.
> But lately some have
> predicted its demise in the foreseeable future.
TOM: Others can't imagine that.
> How could this come about? Usenet is currently a system under great
> pressures.
CROW: [Lloyd Bridges] By now my disks were aching...
MIKE: Too easy, Crow.
> What will happen if the volume of posts rises far faster
> than the number of users
TOM: The current users will all get Carpal-Tunnel Syndrome.
> or the system's ability to assimilate them?
MIKE: [chanting] RENEW! RENEW! RENEW!
TOM: Oh, I see what he meant.
CROW: Tom, you dickweed. Can't you assimilate anything?
> What will happen if the number of people trying to improperly "cash in"
> on Usenet for free advertising, even in places not designated for
> advertising, grows by leaps and bounds, such as some unscrupulous
> individuals have promoted?
TOM: I didn't know Don King had an account.
MIKE: Talk about improperly. Shouldn't that be "Cash, Erin"?
CROW: Oh sure, pander to your audience.
> Here are the possibilities:
>
> 1.) More and more newsgroups will seek moderation and more active
> editorial control to cope with undisciplined users.
CROW: Newsgroups pass the Volstead Act and Elliot Ness and
his band of "Unpostables" are called in to keep order!
>
> 2.) With surging volume,
TOM: Wow, a Metallica concert.
> growing much faster than the user base,
> Usenet sites, commercial or otherwise, will require stiffer barriers
> to entry.
MIKE: Not a word, Crow.
> More of them will charge fees by the line, by number of
> posts, or both, to contribute.
CROW: Oh, they'll be AT&T
TOM: Does that mean we'll have a Friends & Family Usenet next?
> 3.) Governmental and educational sites may have to further restrict
> their propagation of news, as formerly noncommercial newsgroups
> become swamped with "get-rick-quick" artists placing ads where they
> don't belong.
MIKE: Did you know there's an entire "Rick" wing in the Louvre?
> 4.) Usenet may evolve into a lookalike of the highpriced online
> services like Compu$erve and Prodigy.
TOM: Wonder which one of those this Guy guy subscribes to.
> Some people might welcome such an outcome.
MIKE: But I think I've clearly shown that such people are Satan.
> But trends like this
> would be a tragedy for those who value the Usenet system now,
> which allows the humblest of us, without censorship, to express
> his thoughts on most newsgroups and practically any subject.
CROW: Off-Topic, my ass!
MIKE: I can't tell. Is he saying that only men are humble or
that only men should be allowed to express their views?
TOM: Or that women don't value the Usenet.
MIKE: Oh yeah, I missed that one.
> The
> dream of "broadcast journalism" for the masses that Usenet
> represents will be crushed.
TOM: If my computer starts picking up Dan Rather it's going
to Goodwill!
CROW: But if it starts picking up that chick from the Aerosmith
videos...
MIKE: Crow!
> Some might say that the death of
> Usenet is inevitable, that greed and folly will deal such a good
> thing an early death.
MIKE: Wow, don't play poker with Greed and Folly.
> But, despite the considerable user
> population, Usenet has seemed to get along pretty well for many
> years now. I believe there is reason to hope that our darkest
> fears may be averted.
TOM: No Dr. Ruth Wad file for Doom 2?
MIKE: No, but he forgot to say "<Pollyanna mode on>"
> If the great majority of users who enjoy
> Usenet and earnestly want to see it continue and even improve and
> evolve into something better are willing to take a stand, and
> recognize the threats that Usenet faces, we will stop the
> degeneration or disintegration of this resource.
CROW: [announcer] Next week, watch Guy try to make a sentence
longer than a paragraph.
> Guy Berliner
> --
> Finger berliner@netcom18.netcom.com for pgp key.
CROW: You finger him, I'm bitter.
> Please send me encrypted mail! Everyone else will see gibberish,
> but I'll only see plaintext, cause I just push the "Decrypt"
> button in my copy of Windows Z-mail! (Ask me for more info.)
MIKE: I think that's more than we really needed to know about
Mr. Berliner.
----------------------
tgilbert@salsa.abq.bdm.com The owls are not what they seem
<I speak for the only person I can speak for>
o/~ "Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand"
Memory, prophecy and fantasy-
the past, the future and the dreaming moment between-
are all one country, living one immortal day.
To know that is wisdom.
To use it is the Art. Clive Barker