home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
- Reported by Vladimir Sukonnik/Process Software Corporation
-
- Minutes of the TP/IX Working Group (TPIX)
-
-
- First Session Agenda
-
- o AD assignment plan
- o Transit network policy
-
-
- Status of the TP/IX Proposal
-
- The session started with Vladimir Sukonnik's short presentation on the
- status of TP/IX and RAP projects. RAP version 1 has been released as a
- commercial product by Process Software Corporation. The work has begun
- on implementing TP/IX in future releases of the product. Two
- Experimental RFCs have been published describing RAP and TP/IX, thus
- setting the stage for vendor prototype implementation. Vladimir has
- also outlined the main features of TP/IX and how they compare to other
- IPng proposals.
-
-
- Transit Network Selection
-
- Robert Ullmann described the Transit Network Selection Internet-Draft.
- The document outlines an approach to allow network users to select the
- carrier the same way the telephone customers in the US can select a
- long-distance provider. The idea is that the border router managed by
- the customer must be able to acquire knowledge in real time of
- the availability and costs of the transit networks, and be able to
- select one for each datagram forwarded to the external router.
-
-
- Administrative Domain Assignment Plan
-
- Robert presented an idea on how to assign Administrative Domain
- numbers for the version 7 Internet. The objective is to use a very
- small amount of space in the numbering system, while providing the
- necessary distribution of authority. AD numbers are assigned out of the
- same numbering plan as version 4 network numbers. This helps prevent
- confusion when the first part of an IPv7 8-byte address is erroneously
- used as an IPv4 address. It also may be useful in routing ADs with
- existing routing protocols. The AD 192.0.0 is assigned to the present
- version 4 numbering plan. This AD has a specific plan for assignment
- within it:
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
- o The first 24 bits are the AD (192.0.0).
- o The next 8 to 24 bits are a network number, each assigned to a
- specific organization.
- o The remaining 16 to 40 bits are assigned to subnets and hosts by
- authority reserved to a specific organization.
-
-
- Transition
-
- Tim Dixon asked Robert and Vladimir to elaborate on the transition
- plan for TP/IX. As noted in RFC 1475, it is possible to provide a
- mostly-transparent bridge between IPv7 and IPv4. Most of the
- translation should consist of copying various fields, verifying fixed
- values in the datagram being translated, and setting fixed values in
- the datagram being produced. The objective of the conversion is to be
- able to upgrade systems, both hosts and routers, in whatever order
- desired by the owners. Organizations must be able to upgrade any
- given system without reconfiguration or modification of any other
- system; IPv4 hosts must also be able to interoperate essentially forever.
-
-
- Future Plans
-
- Robert was asked to elaborate on the future plans for TP/IX:
-
-
- o RAP version 1 is done and shipping.
- o Prototype TP/IX is planned to be shipped in the next release of the
- software.
- o Design is ready for vendor prototype.
-
-
- Second Session Agenda
-
- o TCP large window/performance options
- o Record Marking option
-
-
- In the second day of the working group meeting, Robert described
- the TCP version 7 options Internet-Draft. By enlarging the TCP window
- and sequence number fields to 64 bits, we can avoid the problem that
- TCP v4 is having now. Mainly, the wrap-around time with the current TCP
- version is relatively short for fast networks.
-
-
- Selective Acknowledgement Option
-
- There is a new option to allow the receiver to indicate that some block
- of data, not ``connected'' to the left (start) edge of the TCP window,
- has been received. This option will allow unnecessary retransmissions
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
- to be avaided. Only lost segments will be retransmitted, not the whole
- window. This option is useful on connections with large RTTs and large
- bandwidths.
-
-
- Timestamp Option
-
- There is a new option to accurately measure the round-trip delay of the
- network path being used for a TCP connection. It contains a timestamp
- value selected by the sending TCP, and a copy of the most
- recently-received timestamp from the other TCP.
-
-
- Record Mark Option
-
- This option indicates the boundary of an application record. The record
- mark is constructed by the TCP service interface at the sender, and
- passed to the receiver's service interface. It is not used directly by
- the TCP, except that the TCP may use record marks as hints for where
- segments might be divided for maximum performance.
-
-
- Large Port Number Field
-
- Another proposal is to increase the TCP/UDP port number fields to
- 32 bits. The current version is suffering from ``port burn-out.'' The
- current field size of 16 bits will max out at 16K connections in four
- minutes. Port numbers are divided into several ranges:
-
-
- 0 Reserved
- 1-32767 Internet registered (well-known) protocols
- 32768-98303 Reserved to allow TCPv7-TCPv4 conversion
- 98304 up Dynamic assignment
-
-
- Attendees
-
- Frederik Andersen fha@dde.dk
- Anders Baardsgaad anders@cc.uit.no
- Fred Baker fbaker@acc.com
- Jim Bound bound@zk3.dec.com
- Thomas Cordetti tomc@digibd.com
- Al Costanzo al@akc.com
- Geert Jan de Groot geertj@ica.philips.nl
- Tim Dixon dixon@rare.nl
-
- 3
-
-
-
-
-
- Kurt Dobbins dobbins@ctron.com
- Kjeld Borch Egevang kbe@craycom.dk
- Eric Fleischman ericf@act.boeing.com
- Phil Irey pirey@relay.nswc.navy.mil
- William Simpson Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
- Vladimir Sukonnik sukonnik@process.com
- Robert Ullmann ariel@world.std.com
-
-
-
- 4
-