home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > From: "Timo Harmo - SocSci U of Helsinki" <HARMO@valt.helsinki.fi>
-
- >> In the end, there will be hypertext, certainly.
- > Yes, I agree (I hate hierarchical information systems). But meanwhile
- > gopher (wais I don't know about) offers working systems for many
- > platforms, doesn't it?
- >
- > Let's continue on the list.
-
- Ok, a discussion of the proliferation of protocols is a thing suitable for the
- list. Timo had been saying - why not broadcast about W3 on the WAIS and Gopher
- lists/groups? Well, every now and again I mention it, but I do not want to misuse
- the groups.
-
- Yes, gopher offers working systems for many platforms. The gopher protocol
- is VERY like the basic HTTP protocol. We feel that the W3 model is more general.
- Its very easy to write gopher and w3 servers, but more difficult to write w3
- browsers. The trouble is, it takes longer to write a hypertext browser because the
- hypertext widgets won't exist. The gopher people are doing really good work by
- getting information out there. This gives everyone experience. We run the w3 web
- with the gopher web as a subset. This gives a lot of data. It means w3-based search
- engines and indexers can include gopher data.
-
- The disappointing thing of course is that a lot of information is better presented
- as hypertext. If you like, a gopher menu page is ulrra-simple hypertext. Real
- hypertext, with the little formatting you get in HTML, is more powerful, and leads
- to better communication between the information provider and the reader. And
- communication is what we are talking about.
-
- Actually, the HTTP protocol is not te most important thing for people to use. There
- will always be many S&R protcols. The W3 addressing syntax is much more important.
-
- >> - Timo
- - Tim
-
-
-