| From: | Robin Hueskes |
| Date: | 9 Jan 2000 at 15:38:02 |
| Subject: | Re: MUI, having nothing to do with OS3.5 |
From: Robin Hueskes <robinh@knuut.de>
Hello Uffe
> Personally I find MUI to be one of the most important items on our
> platform.
Yep ... its number three in installation ...
first cgx, second KingCON, third MUI !!!
After that a proper CDFS (CacheCDFS from IDEFix97)
MCP , ReqAttack , PowerWB and when still with OS3.1
there should be CGWBPattern which dont work with 3.5
(BTW why is there still no Tool replacing the CGWBPattern ?)
> And a side note: I have absolutely no problems with instability and MUI.
> The only regular crashes that I experience is in my opinion contributed to
> Voyager and not in any way to MUI.
As long as you leave behind the 68000 and 68020 and have more than 8 MB Fast
there should be no problem with crashing MUI ... This is a hardware requirement
most common to the majority of the new programs (I know MUI is some years old)
I wish the GUI for AOS would have been MUI ... But thats history :(
Regards
The Community makes it happen ...
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Hey Freelancers: Find your next project through JobSwarm!
You can even make money in your sleep by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm1 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------