...The power triple for the jth output of a device is computed from
the input triples and the coupling terms as follows:
P1min(out)j | = |
|
(2) | ||
P0max(out)j | = |
|
(3) | ||
Pmax(out)j | = |
|
(4) |
The loss and cross talk terms Lij are the edge weights mentioned above. Note that circuit heuristics are ignored because the extremes are taken over all device states. That is, the power triple is guaranteed to be a bound on the worst case; but in a circuit, the worst case may not be as poor as the triple owing to the exclusion of some combinations of states and inputs. Equation () shows the most important reason for tracking Pmax: the greatest power produces the largest possible cross talk term in this model. Thus Pmax is essential for calculating subsequent P0max terms.
As example system components, consider lithium niobate directional couplers and passive 3-dB couplers as logic devices and optical fiber and 3-dB splitters for interconnection. Figure 3 shows a lithium niobate directional coupler configured as a five-terminal optical device.[#!6!#] Of the three device inputs, a, b, and c, only the first two are transmitting inputs; inputs that couple power directly to the outputs. Input c, a detection point in our terminology, functions as a device control. As the logic equation shows, when sufficient power is applied to c, the switch is placed in the bar state; otherwise it is in the cross state. The graph model on the right of the figure makes c into a detection point that is independent of the two-state coupling between the other inputs and outputs. Figure 4 illustrates at a more functional level how the transmission coupling occurs.
3-dB couplers and splitters are modeled as devices with two inputs and two outputs, with 3-dB of loss from each input to each output, no cross talk, a single device state, and no detection points. Lossy interconnections, such as optical fibers, are modeled as devices with one input, one output, a single loss term, no cross talk, a single device state, and no detection points. There is no need to model loss-free interconnections, since they add nothing to the analysis. However, if it is desired to model them for clarity, or if a graphical system model already exists that contains them, they may be modeled exactly like lossy interconnections, but with zero loss and cross talk.